Advertisement

Pattern Recognition in High Speed Schlieren Visualization at the High Enthalpy Shock Tunnel Göttingen (HEG)

  • J. Wolfram
  • J. Martinez Schramm
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design book series (NNFM, volume 112)

Summary

Time resolved digital high speed image recordings of flow properties using schlieren and shadowgraph methods have become standard tools in today’s investigations of hypersonic flows. Postprocessing is often necessary to enhance image quality, followed by quantitative image analysis to measure important flow features. Therefore, a software has been developed allowing flexible design of evaluation workflows and a high degree of automation. Evaluation of shock stand-off distance and shock angle in experimental visualization series at HEG can be carried out. Even force prediction based on analysis of model displacement has been realized. The tool and design considerations based on typical problems of hypersonic flow visualization are discussed. Flow image analysis processes and results using a pattern recognition approach known as “Hough transformation” are presented.

Keywords

Mach Number Combustion Chamber Force Prediction Shock Angle Pattern Recognition Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ballard, D.H.: Generalizing the Hough Transform to Detect Arbitrary Shapes. Pattern Recognition 13, 111–122 (1981)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hannemann, K., Schnieder, M., Reimann, B., Martinez Schramm, J.: The Influence and the Delay of Driver Gas Contamination in HEG. In: 21st AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, Nr. AIAA 2000-2593, Denver, CO (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hough, P.: Method and Means for Recognizing Complex Patterns, U.S. Patent (1962)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kolleck, M.: Konzeption und Implementierung eines Werkzeuges zur Auswertung von Messdaten mit Hilfe von ”visual programming”, Thesis, University of Cooperative Education Mannheim (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martinez Schramm, J., Karl, S., Hannemann, K.: High Speed Flow Visualization at HEG, New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics IV. Notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multidisciplinary design, vol. 87, pp. 229–235. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Toepler, C.: Beobachtungen nach einer neuen optischen Methode - Ein Beitrag zur Experimentalphysik, Max Cohen und Sohn, Bonn (1864)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wolfram, J.: Bildanalyse zeitlich aufgelster Sichtbarmachungen von Hochenthalpieströmungen in einer verteilten ”Visual Programming”-Umgebung, Master Thesis, University of Göttingen (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Wolfram
    • 1
  • J. Martinez Schramm
    • 1
  1. 1.German Aerospace Center (DLR)Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology, Spacecraft SectionGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations