Skip to main content

Inflation Differentials in the Euro Area: A Survey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The European Central Bank at Ten

Abstract

The objective of the European Central Bank (ECB) is price stability, which the ECB has defined as an inflation rate in the euro area in the medium run that is below but close to 2%. The ECB does not focus on inflation in individual countries in the euro area. However, several years after the launch of the euro, inflation differentials among euro area countries are still subject to much debate. After converging sharply in the 1990s, national inflation rates started to diverge again in 1999; since then, the standard deviation of the annual inflation rates among euro area members has fluctuated around 1%—a substantial figure (Angeloni & Ehrmann 2007).

The views expressed in this chapter are those of the author and should not be attributed to De Nederlandsche Bank.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    However, what matters for investment and consumption decisions are ex ante measures of real interest rates, i.e., the difference between market interest rates and expectations for inflation developments over the relevant horizon. The dispersion across countries of ex ante measures of real interest rates is significantly lower than that of ex post measures (European Central Bank 2005).

  2. 2.

    The data refer to the current countries in the euro area. I am thankful to Lourdes Acedo-Montoya from the European Commission (DG ECFIN) for providing these data.

  3. 3.

    As pointed out by Rabanal (2009), the Balassa–Samuelson hypothesis could explain the higher inflation rate in the service sector (as a proxy for the non-tradable sector) than in the goods sector (as a proxy for the tradable sector).

  4. 4.

    It may be argued that the Balassa–Samaulson effect may be more relevant for the new EU member states. However, according to Égert and Podpiera (2008), for the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia the relevant literature over the past 5 years failed to quantify a sizable Balassa–Samuelson effect, with the average effect from 20 recent studies accounting at best for one-third of the actual real exchange rate appreciation of more than 30% from 1995 to 2006. However, Mihaljek and Klau (2008) conclude that the Balassa–Samuelson effects are clearly present and explain around 24% of inflation differentials vis-à-vis the euro area (about 1.2% points on average) in their sample of 11 countries in central and eastern Europe covering the period from the mid-1990s to the first quarter of 2008.

  5. 5.

    Inflation data come from the ECB, while the output gap data come from EconStats. The data for Ireland and the Netherlands run to 2006 only.

  6. 6.

    This effect also occurs in relationship to countries outside the monetary union. Since the euro’s (flexible) nominal exchange rate against the currencies of such countries is geared to economic developments of the euro area as a whole, euro-area countries with an above-average inflation rate see their competitive position vis-à-vis non-euro-area countries decline, while euro-area countries with a below-average inflation rate see their competitive position improve (Remsperger 2003).

  7. 7.

    Financial integration may provide for insurance against asymmetric shocks. If residents of the member countries of a monetary union hold monetary union-wide diversified portfolios the costs of asymmetric shocks will be born by all residents (Beck et al. 2009). However, as De Haan, Oosterloo, and Schoenmaker (2009) show, despite substantial progress in financial integration in Europe, portfolios of many European financial institutions are still characterized by a high home bias.

  8. 8.

    Asymmetric shocks and differences in the transmission of and the policy reaction to common shocks are, of course, among the driving forces of diverging business cycles.

  9. 9.

    These factors can be related. According to the European Central Bank (2005), euro area energy and unprocessed food prices seem to change most frequently, while service prices appear to be modified less frequently.

  10. 10.

    Evidence presented by Dhyne, Alvarez, Le Bihan, Veronese, Dias, Hoffmann, Jonker, Lünnemann, Rumler, and Vilmunen (2006) for the euro area suggests that prices are changed on average every 13 months.

  11. 11.

    In Sect. 2.5 we will discuss some recent research on labour market reform that aims to increase labour market flexibility.

  12. 12.

    Fendel and Frenkel (2009) examine whether inflation differentials have influenced the behaviour of the ECB since the launch of the euro. They hypothesise that the ECB may have been less restrictive than euro area wide developments would dictate thereby preventing deflation in the low inflation countries. Their Taylor rule model outcomes suggest an influence of inflation differentials on monetary policy in the euro area. With higher inflation divergence, the ECB was more reluctant to fight an overall inflation gap.

References

  • Alesina, A., Ardagna, S., & Galasso, V. (2008). The Euro and structural reforms. NBER Working Paper No. 14479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altissimo, F., Benigno, P., & Rodriguez Palenzuela, D. (2005). Long-run determinants of inflation differentials in a monetary union. NBER Working Paper No. 11473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M., Masuch, K., & Schiffbauer, M. (2009). Determinants of inflation and price level differentials across the Euro area countries. ECB Working Paper No. 1129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrés, J., Ortega, E., & Vallés, J. (2008). Competition and inflation differentials in EMU. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 32(3), 848–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeloni, I., & Ehrmann, M. (2004). Euro area inflation differentials. ECB Working Paper No. 388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angeloni, I., & Ehrmann, M. (2007). Euro area inflation differentials. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, Topics, 7(1), article 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, M., & Kouparitsas, M. (2005). Determinants of business cycle comovement: A robust analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52, 113–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, C. (1998). The interaction of aggregate-demand policies and labour market reform. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 5(2), 353–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, G.W., Hubrich, K., & Marcellino, M. (2009). Regional inflation dynamics within and across euro area countries and a comparison with the United States. Economic Policy, 141–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednarek-Sekunda, E., Jong-A-Pin, R., & de Haan, J. (2010). The European economic and monetary union and labour market reform. European Union Politics, 11, 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benigno, P. (2004). Optimal monetary policy in a currency area. Journal of International Economics, 63, 293–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertola, G., & Boeri, T. (2002). EMU labour markets two years on: Microeconomic tensions and institutional evolution. In M. Buti & A. Sapir (Eds.), EMU and economic policy in Europe (pp. 249–280). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calmfors, L. (2001). Unemployment, labour-market reform and monetary union. Journal of Labour Economics, 19(2), 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calmfors, L., & Driffill, J. (1988). Bargaining structure, corporatism, and macroeconomic performance. Economic Policy, 6, 13–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campolmi, A., & Faia, E. (2004). Inflation differentials and different labour market institutions in the EMU. Mimeo: Pompeu Fabra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti, S. C., Mark, N., & Sonora, R. (2002). Price level convergence among United States cities: lessons for the European Central Bank. International Economic Review, 43, 1081–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. E., & van Wincoop, E. (2001). Borders and business cycles. Journal of International Economics, 55, 59–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, J., Eijffinger, S. C. W., & Waller, S. (2005). The European Central Bank Credibility, transparency, and centralization. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, J., Inklaar, R., & Jong-A-Pin, R. M. (2008). Will business cycles in the euro area converge? A critical survey of empirical research. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(2), 243–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, J., Oosterloo, S., & Schoenmaker, D. (2009). European financial markets and institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dhyne, E., Alvarez, L. J., Le Bihan, H., Veronese, G., Dias, D., Hoffmann, J., et al. (2006). Price changes in the euro area and the United States: some facts from individual consumer price data. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 171–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, M., & Wolman, A. L. (2008). Fiscal policy and regional inflation in a currency union. Journal of International Economics, 74, 384–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duval, R., & Elmeskov, J. (2006). The effects of EMU on structural reforms in labour and product markets. ECB Working Paper No. 596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Égert, B., & Podpiera, J. (2008). Beyond Balassa-Samuelson in Visegrad-4 countries. VOX EU, 2 April 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Central Bank (2003). Inflation differentials in the euro area: Potential causes and policy implications, Frankfurt: European Central Bank. Available at: http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/other/inflationdifferentialreporten.pdf.

  • European Central Bank (2005). Monetary policy and inflation differentials in a heterogeneous currency area. Monthly Bulletin, 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatás, A. (1997). EMU: countries or regions? Lessons from the EMS experience. European Economic Review, 41(3–5), 743–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fendel, R., & Frenkel, M. (2009). Inflation differentials in the euro area: did the ECB care? Applied Economics, 41, 1293–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. A., & Rose, A. K. (1998). The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria. Economic Journal, 108, 1009–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honohan, P., & Lane, P. (2003). Divergent inflation rates in EMU. Economic Policy, 18(37), 358–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honohan, P., & Lane, P. (2004). Exchange rates and inflation under EMU: An update. Economic Policy Web Essay. Available at: http://www.economicpolicy.org/responses.asp.

  • Hüfner, F.P., & Schröder, M. (2002). Exchange rate pass-through to consumer prices: A European perspective. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 02-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbs, J. (2004). Trade, finance, specialization and synchronization. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 723–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbs, J. (2006). The real effects of financial integration. Journal of International Economics, 68(2), 296–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inklaar, R., Jong-A-Pin, R. M., & De Haan, J. (2008). Trade and business cycle synchronization in OECD countries: A re-examination. European Economic Review, 52(4), 646–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiner-Killinger, N., López Pérez, V., Stiegert, R., & Vitale, G. (2007). Structural reforms in EMU and the role of monetary policy A survey of the literature. ECB Occasional Paper No. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihaljek, D., & Klau, M. (2008). Catching-up and inflation in transition economies: the Balassa-Samuelson effect revisited. BIS Working Papers No. 270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsley, D., & Wei, S.-J. (1996). Convergence to the law of one price without trade barriers or currency fluctuations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 1211–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabanal, P. (2009). Inflation differentials between Spain and the EMU: A DSGE perspective. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 41(6), 1142–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remsperger, H. (2003). Inflation differentials in EMU. Causes and implications. Presentation at the CEPR/ESI Seventh Annual Conference on “The Euro Area as an Economic Entity” in Eltville on 13 September 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibert, A. (2003). The New Monetary Policy Strategy of the ECB. Briefing paper for the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs of the European Parliament, May 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakob de Haan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Haan, J. (2010). Inflation Differentials in the Euro Area: A Survey. In: Haan, J., Berger, H. (eds) The European Central Bank at Ten. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14237-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14237-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14236-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14237-6

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics