Skip to main content

A System for Solving Constraint Satisfaction Problems with SMT

  • Conference paper
Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2010 (SAT 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6175))

Abstract

SAT Modulo Theories (SMT) consists of deciding the satisfiability of a formula with respect to a decidable background theory, such as linear integer arithmetic, bit-vectors, etc, in first-order logic with equality. SMT has its roots in the field of verification. It is known that the SAT technology offers an interesting, efficient and scalable method for constraint solving, as many experimentations have shown. Although there already exist some results pointing out the adequacy of SMT techniques for constraint solving, there are no available tools to extensively explore such adequacy. In this paper we introduce a tool for translating FlatZinc (MiniZinc intermediate code) instances of constraint satisfaction problems to the standard SMT-LIB language. It can be used for deciding satisfiability as well as for optimization. The tool determines the required logic for solving each instance. The obtained results suggest that SMT can be effectively used to solve CSPs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bofill, M., Palahi, M., Suy, J., Villaret, M.: SIMPLY: a Compiler from a CSP Modeling Language to the SMT-LIB Format. In: Proceedings of the 8th Intl. Workshop on Constraint Modelling and Reformulation, pp. 30–44 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cadoli, M., Mancini, T., Patrizi, F.: SAT as an Effective Solving Technology for Constraint Problems. In: Esposito, F., Raś, Z.W., Malerba, D., Semeraro, G. (eds.) ISMIS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4203, pp. 540–549. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Dutertre, B., de Moura, L.: The Yices SMT solver (August 2006), Tool paper at http://yices.csl.sri.com/tool-paper.pdf

  4. Frisch, A., Harvey, W., Jefferson, C., Martínez-Hernández, B., Miguel, I.: Essence: A Constraint Language for Specifying Combinatorial Problems. Constraints 13(3), 268–306 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, J.: Universal Booleanization of Constraint Models. In: Stuckey, P.J. (ed.) CP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5202, pp. 144–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Nethercote, N., Stuckey, P., Becket, R., Brand, S., Duck, G., Tack, G.: MiniZinc: Towards a Standard CP Modelling Language. In: Bessière, C. (ed.) CP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4741, pp. 529–543. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A.: On SAT Modulo Theories and Optimization Problems. In: Biere, A., Gomes, C.P. (eds.) SAT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4121, pp. 156–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A., Rodríguez-Carbonell, E., Rubio, A.: Challenges in Satisfiability Modulo Theories. In: Baader, F. (ed.) RTA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4533, pp. 2–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A., Tinelli, C.: Solving SAT and SAT Modulo Theories: From an Abstract Davis–Putnam–Logemann–Loveland Procedure to DPLL(T). Journal of the ACM 53(6), 937–977 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ranise, S., Tinelli, C.: The SMT-LIB Standard: Version 1.2. Tech. rep., Dept. of Comp. Science, University of Iowa (2006), http://www.SMT-LIB.org

  11. Sebastiani, R.: Lazy Satisfiability Modulo Theories. Journal on Satisfiability, Boolean Modeling and Computation 3(3-4), 141–224 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Sheini, H., Sakallah, K.: From Propositional Satisfiability to Satisfiability Modulo Theories. In: Biere, A., Gomes, C.P. (eds.) SAT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4121, pp. 1–9. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Walsh, T.: SAT vs CSP. In: Dechter, R. (ed.) CP 2000. LNCS, vol. 1894, pp. 441–456. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bofill, M., Suy, J., Villaret, M. (2010). A System for Solving Constraint Satisfaction Problems with SMT. In: Strichman, O., Szeider, S. (eds) Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2010. SAT 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6175. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14186-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14186-7_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14185-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14186-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics