Abstract
The article begins with a reminder that the need for RANS modelling in 2009 is not any lower than had been predicted in 1997, when Detached-Eddy Simulation was created against a wave of predictions that Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) would soon make RANS redundant. The CFD community, in large part, has embraced DES and other hybrid RANS-LES approaches for flows other than thin shear layers, while noting their high cost and the uncertainty in arriving at the right numerical resolution and estimating the accuracy of the results. However these approaches leave RANS in charge of the boundary layers. In addition, wall modelling below an LES has the nature of RANS modelling. In short, RANS is in great demand.
Key points are then drawn from a special RANS issue of International Journal of CFD, with the author as guest editor. The articles confirmed the static state of modelling for practical applications since the mid-1990’s, and the near-failure of efforts aimed at making RANS modelling more rigorous, using math or DNS data. They also show that in the applied community pure RANS will be tried for many flows, even those where there is little hope for success, just because of computing cost. This is especially the case for a turbulent flow region that is a small part of a larger system; say the antenna on a car. Therefore, even knowing the strong misgivings which apply to Unsteady RANS (URANS) on conceptual grounds and based on poor results with bluff-body flows, there is reason to continue exploring URANS in 2D and 3D, and there would be great value in RANS models which perform better with it. The meaning of Steady RANS solutions in flows which many observers consider “too unsteady” is discussed, using examples such as the circular cylinder and airfoils at very high angles of attack.
Attention then shifts to the treatment of laminar regions in RANS CFD, with emphasis on proper and reproducible use of the models, without hidden influences of inflow values, numerics, or domain sizes. The promise of transition prediction by local equations is examined.
Finally, the issue of acceptance of new RANS models is addressed in terms of how well the scientific publication system and the code industry are prepared to recognize and implant the next good idea in RANS modelling, especially if it comes from a less-established source without a long record and strong resources, and/or if it conflicts with “common wisdom.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Haase, W., Aupoix, B., Bunge, U., Schwamborn, D. (eds.): FLOMANIA - A European Initiative on Flow Physics Modelling. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, vol. 94. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Haase, W., Braza, M., Revell, A. (eds.): DESider - A European Effort on Hybrid RANS-LES Modelling. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, vol. 103. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Hellsten, A., Wallin, S.: Explicit Algebraic Reynolds Stress and Non-Linear Eeddy-Viscosity Models. Int. J. of Computational Fluid Dynamics 23, 349–361 (2009)
Hirsch, C., Tartinville, B.: Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Modelling for Industrial Applications and Some Challenging Issues. Int. J. of Computational Fluid Dynamics 23, 295–303 (2009)
Kok, J.C.: Resolving the Dependence on Freestream Values for the k–ωTurbulence Model. AIAA J. 38, 1292–1295 (2000)
Langtry, R.B., Menter, F.R., Likki, S.R., Suzen, Y.B., Huang, P.G., Volker, S.: A Correlation-Based Transition Model Using Local Variables Part II - Test Cases and I Industrial Applications. J. of Turbomachinery 128, 423–434 (2006)
Menter, F.R.: Influence of Freestream Values on k–ωTurbulenceModel Predictions. AIAA J. 30, 1657–1659 (1991)
Menter, F.R.: Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications. AIAA J. 32, 1598–1605 (1994); also AIAA Paper, AIAA-93-2906
Menter, F.R., Langtry, R.B., Likki, S.R., Suzen, Y.B., Huang, P.G., Volker, S.: A Correlation-Based Transition Model Using Local Variables Part I – Model Formulation. J. of Turbomachinery 128, 413–422 (2006)
Menter, F.R.: Review of the Shear-Stress Transport Turbulence Model Experience from an Industrial Perspective. Int. J. of Computational Fluid Dynamics 23, 305–316 (2009)
Morrison, J.H., Helmsch, M.J.: Statistical Analysis of CFD Solutions from the Third AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop. AIAA Paper, AIAA-2007-0254 (2007)
Rumsey, C.L., Swanson, R.C.: Turbulence Modelling for Active Flow Control Applications. Int. J. of Computational Fluid Dynamics 23, 317–326 (2009)
Shur, M., Spalart, P.R., Strelets, M., Travin, A.: Navier-Stokes Simulation of Shedding Turbulent Flow Past a Circular Cylinder and a Cylinder with Backward Splitter Plate. In: Proceedings of the Third ECCOMAS Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics 1996, pp. 676–682 (1996)
Shur, M.L., Strelets, M.K., Travin, A.K., Spalart, P.R.: Turbulence Modeling in Rotating and Curved Channels: Assessing the Spalart-Shur Correction. AIAA J. 38, 784–792 (2000)
Shur, M.L., Spalart, P.R., Squiers, K.D., Strelets, M.K., Travin, A.K.: Three Dimensionality in Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes Solutions Around Two-Dimensional Geometries. AIAA J. 43, 1230–1242 (2005)
Spalart, P.R., Allmaras, S.R.: A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows. La Recherche Aerospatiale 1, 5–21 (1994); also AIAA Paper, AIAA-92-0439
Spalart, P.R., Jou, W.-H., Strelets, M., Allmaras, S.R.: Comments on the Feasibility of LES for Wings, and on a Hybrid RANS/LES Approach. In: Liu, C., Liu, Z. (eds.) Advances in LES/DNS, First AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES. Greyden Press (1997)
Spalart, P.R., Shur, M.L.: On the Sensitization of Turbulence Models to Rotation and Curvature. Aerospace Science and Technology 1, 297–302 (1997)
Spalart, P.R., Rumsey, C.L.: Effective Inflow Conditions for Turbulence Models in Aerodynamic Calculations. AIAA J. 45, 2544–2553 (2007)
Travin, A.K., Shur, M.L., Strelets, M.K., Spalart, P.R.: Detached-eddy simulation past a circular cylinder. Int J. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 63, 293–213 (1999)
Wilcox, D.C.: A Two-Equation Turbulence Model for Wall-Bounded and Free-Shear Flows. AIAA Paper, AIAA-93-2905 (1993)
Zingg, D.W., Godin, P.: A Perspective on Turbulence Models for Aerodynamic Flows. Int. J. of Computational Fluid Dynamics 23, 327–335 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Spalart, P. (2010). Reflections on RANS Modelling. In: Peng, SH., Doerffer, P., Haase, W. (eds) Progress in Hybrid RANS-LES Modelling. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, vol 111. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14168-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14168-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14167-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14168-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)