Advertisement

Understanding the Haptic Experience through Bodily Engagement with Sculptural Ceramics

  • Bonnie Kemske
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6192)

Abstract

This paper presents an on-going research project undertaken by an artist-researcher who uses both investigation into haptic theory and the creation of ceramic objects to increase our understanding of the experience of touch. It asks the question, “How and in what way can an artist contribute to understanding haptics?” The artistic journey began with an interest in the textured surface of ceramics. Physiological, anthropological, and philosophical perspectives were interwoven with studio practice, resulting in the creation of ‘cast hugs’, ceramic sculptures made through the use of the artist’s body. The physical qualities of the ceramic objects positively engaged participants’ haptic abilities to distinguish shape, to discriminate texture, temperature, and weight, and to engage their sense of proprioception. It was found that when these senses were fully stimulated, emotions, memories, and associations were strongly evoked.

Keywords

haptic art tactile art touch art tactile ceramics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Frayling, C.: Research Papers: Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art 1(1) (April 1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyton, Hawthorne (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kemske, B.: Towards a Touch Aesthetic, Intersections. In: Association of Art Historians Annual Conference, April 2-4, Manchester Metropolitan University (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sinclair, D.: Mechanisms of Cutaneous Sensation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1981)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McNiff, S.: Art-based Research. In: Knowles, G., Cole, A. (eds.) Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples and Issues, p. 30. Sage Inc., Thousand Oaks (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barley, N.: Smashing Pots: Works of Clay from Africa. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Merleau-Ponty, M.: The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology. In: The Philosophy of Art, History and Politics, p. 37. Northwestern University Press, Evanston (1964)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Merleau-Ponty, M.: The Visible and the Invisible: Followed by Working Notes, p. 266. Northwestern University Press, Evanston (1968)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kemske, B.: Embracing Sculptural Ceramics: A Lived Experience of Touch in Art. Senses & Society 4(3), 342 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Merleau-Ponty, M.: The Visible and the Invisible: Followed by Working Notes, p. 123. Northwestern University Press, Evanston (1968)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bonnie Kemske
    • 1
  1. 1.Affiliated with the Museum of Archaeology and AnthropologyCambridge UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations