Haptic/VR Assessment Tool for Fine Motor Control
The Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT) is routinely used in clinical environments to evaluate a patient’s fine hand control. A physician measures the total time required to insert nine pegs into nine holes and obtains information on the dexterity of the patient. Even though this method is simple and known to be reliable, using a virtual environment with haptic feedback instead of the classical device could give a more complete diagnosis which would isolate different constituting components of a pathology and objectively assess motor ability. Haptic devices enable extracting a large quantity of information by recording the position and the exerted forces at high frequency (1kHz). In addition to the creation of a realistic virtual counterpart of the NHPT, the present work also includes the implementation of real-time data analysis in order to extract meaningful and objective scores for the physician and the patient. A healthy group of volunteers performed the real and virtual tests which yielded a baseline for the scores of the different measured mobility parameters. Once calibrated, the virtual test successfully discriminates different mobility dysfunctions simulated by a healthy subject.
Keywordshaptics virtual reality clinical assessment dexterity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Amirabdollahian, F., Gomes, G.T., Johnson, G.R.: The Peg-in-Hole: A VR-Based Haptic Assessment for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance and Skills. In: IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (2005)Google Scholar
- 2.Choi, S., Tan, H.Z.: Discrimination of Virtual Haptic Textures Rendered with Different Update Rates. In: Proc. of the 1st Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symp. on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (2005)Google Scholar
- 3.Feys, P., et al.: Arm training in Multiple Sclerosis using Phantom: clinical relevance of robotic outcome measures. In: IEEE 11th Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics (2009)Google Scholar
- 4.Gomes, G.T., Amirabdollahian, F., Johnson, G.R.: Quantifying upper limb motor control: the Peg in Hole test. In: ISB XXth Congress - ASB 29th Annual Meeting (2005)Google Scholar
- 5.Hannaford, B., Wood, L., McAffee, D.A., Zak, H.: Performance Evaluation of a Six-Axis Generalized Force-Reflecting Teleoperator. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 21(3) (1991)Google Scholar
- 6.Mathiowetz, V., Weber, K., Kashman, N., Volland, G.: Adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of finger dexterity. Occup. Ther. J. of R 5(1), 24–38 (1985)Google Scholar
- 9.Unger, B.J., Nicolaidis, A., Berkelman, P.J., Thompson, A., Klatzky, R.L., Hollis, R.L.: Comparison of 3-D haptic peg-in-hole tasks in real and virtual environments. In: IEEE/RSJ, IROS, pp. 1751–1756 (2001)Google Scholar
- 10.Xydas, E.G., Louca, L.S.: Design and Development of a Haptic Peg-Board Exercise for the Rehabilitation of People with Multiple Sclerosis. In: IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (2007)Google Scholar