Advertisement

Influence of Vision and Haptics on Plausibility of Social Interaction in Virtual Reality Scenarios

  • Zheng Wang
  • Ji Lu
  • Angelika Peer
  • Martin Buss
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6192)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the effects of visual and haptic feedback on the experienced plausibility of social interaction in a virtual reality scenario, where participants were asked to perform handshakes with a virtual, visually and haptically rendered partner. A 3D virtual environment was created and integrated with a handshaking robot, enabling the participant to see the virtual partner while shaking hands. To assess the effect of visual and haptic rendering strategies on plausibility, an experiment with human subjects was carried out. The results indicate that adding vision and improving the quality of haptics, both improve plausibility. Similar effect sizes further suggest that vision and haptics are equally important to the perceived plausibility of a virtual handshaking task.

Keywords

plausibility social interaction virtual reality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Autodesk. 3ds Max. http://www.autodesk.com
  2. 2.
    Basdogan, C., Ho, C.H., Srinivasan, M.A., Slater, M.: An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 7(4), 443–460 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cobos, S., Ferre, M., Ortego, J., Sanchez-Uran, M.: Simplified hand configuration for object manipulation. In: Ferre, M. (ed.) EuroHaptics 2008. LNCS, vol. 5024, pp. 730–735. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Giannopoulos, E., Eslava, V., Oyarzabal, M., Hierro, T., González, L., Ferre, M., Slater, M.: The effect of haptic feedback on basic social interaction within shared virtual environments. In: Proceedings of Euro Haptics 2008, Madrid, Spain, pp. 301–307 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoffman, H.: Physically touching virtual objects using tactil augmentation enhances the realism of virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, USA, pp. 59–63 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lederman, S., Thorne, G., Jones, B.: Perception of texture by vision and touch: Multidimensionality and intersensory integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 12(2), 169–180 (1986)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peer, A., Buss, M.: A New Admittance Type Haptic Interface for Bimanual Manipulations. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 13(4), 416–428 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sallnäs, E., Rassmus-Gröhn, K., Sjöström, C.: Supporting presence in collaborative environments by haptic force feedback. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7, 461–476 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Slater, M.: Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B (in Press), http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/m.slater/Papers/rss-prepublication.pdf/
  11. 11.
    Slater, M., Marcos, D., Ehrsson, H., Sanchez-Vives, M.: Inducing illusory ownership of a virtual body. Frontiers in Neuroscience 3(2), 214–220 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Wang, Z., Peer, A., Buss, M.: An HMM approach to realistic haptic human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of World Haptics, USA, pp. 374–379 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zheng Wang
    • 1
  • Ji Lu
    • 1
  • Angelika Peer
    • 1
  • Martin Buss
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Automatic Control EngineeringTechnische Universität MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations