Skip to main content

The Influence of Different Haptic Environments on Time Delay Discrimination in Force Feedback

  • Conference paper
Haptics: Generating and Perceiving Tangible Sensations (EuroHaptics 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6191))

Abstract

Time delay in haptic telepresence arising from compression or communication alters the phase characteristics of the environment impedance. This paper describes how well a human operator can discriminate these changes in haptic environments. Three different environments are rendered on a haptic interface and manually excited by a human operator using sinusoidal movements. We find that time delay in haptic feedback can be discriminated starting from 15 ms in a pure damper environment, 36 ms in a spring system, and 72 ms when moving a damped inertia. We conclude that the discrimination thresholds increase with the absolute phase between velocity and force signals resulting from the remote environment characteristics. These results may benefit the human-centered design of high-fidelity haptic communication protocols and haptic filters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chen, J.Y.C., Haas, E.C., Barnes, M.J.: Human performance issues and user interface design for teleoperated robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews 37(6), 1231–1245 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Weber, E.: Die Lehre vom Tastsinne und Gemeingefühle auf Versuche gegründet. Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn (1851)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deml, B.: Human Factors Issues on the Design of Telepresence Systems. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 16(5), 471–487 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tan, H., Srinivasan, M., Eberman, B., Cheng, B.: Human factors for the design of force-reflecting haptic interfaces. Dynamic Systems and Control 55(1), 353–359 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adelstein, B.D., Lee, T.G., Ellis, S.R.: Head tracking latency in virtual environments: psychophysics and a model. In: Proceedingsof the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th annual meeting, pp. 2083–2087 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arrighi, R., Alais, D., Burr, D.: Perceptual synchrony of audiovisual streams for natural and artificial motion sequences. Journal of Vision 6(3), 260–268 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dixon, N.F., Spitz, L.: The detection of auditory visual desynchrony. Perception 9, 719–721 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eid, M., Orozco, M., El Saddik, A.: A guided tour in haptic audio visual environments and applications. International Journal for Media and Communication 1(3), 265–297 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frank, L.H., Casali, J.G., Wierwille, W.W.: Effects of visual display and motion system delays on operator performance and uneasiness in a driving simulator. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 30(2), 201–217 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peer, A., Hirche, S., Weber, C., Krause, I., Buss, M., Miossec, S., Evrard, P., Stasse, O., Neo, E., Kheddar, A., Yokoi, K.: Intercontinental multimodal tele-cooperation using a humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 405–411 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shahabi, C., Ortega, A., Kolahdouzan, M.: A comparison of different haptic compression techniques. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), pp. 657–660 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hirche, S., Hinterseer, P., Steinbach, E., Buss, M.: Transparent data reduction in networked telepresence and teleaction systems. Part i: Communication without time delay. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 16(5), 523–531 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirche, S., Buss, M.: Transparent data reduction in networked telepresence and teleaction systems. Part ii: Time-delayed communication. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 16(5), 532–542 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jay, C., Glencross, M., Hubbold, R.: Modeling the effects of delayed haptic and visual feedback in a collaborative virtual environment. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 14(2), 8/1–31 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rank, M., Shi, Z., Müller, H.J., Hirche, S.: Perception of delay in haptic telepresence systems. In: Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments (accepted 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shi, Z., Hirche, S., Schneider, W.X., Müller, H.J.: Influence of visuomotor action on visual-haptic simultaneous perception: A psychophysical study. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, pp. 65–70. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Treutwein, B., Strasburger, H.: Fitting the psychometric function. Percept. Psychophys. 61(1), 87–106 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fraisse, P.: Perception and estimation of time. Annual Review of Psychology 35, 1–36 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, X.D., Bischof, W., Boulanger, P.: Perception of haptic force magnitude during hand movements. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2061–2066 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zadeh, M.H., Wang, D., Kubica, E.: Perception-based lossy haptic compression considerations for velocity-based interactions. Multimedia Systems 13, 275–282 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Achhammer, A., Weber, C., Peer, A., Buss, M.: Improvement of model-mediated teleoperation using a new hybrid environment estimation technique. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Park, D.J., Jun, B.E.: Selfperturbing recursive least squares algorithm with fast tracking capability. Electronics Letters 28, 558–559 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rank, M., Shi, Z., Müller, H.J., Hirche, S. (2010). The Influence of Different Haptic Environments on Time Delay Discrimination in Force Feedback. In: Kappers, A.M.L., van Erp, J.B.F., Bergmann Tiest, W.M., van der Helm, F.C.T. (eds) Haptics: Generating and Perceiving Tangible Sensations. EuroHaptics 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6191. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14064-8_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14064-8_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14063-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14064-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics