Skip to main content

Abstract

Sources providing information about the value of a variable may not be totally reliable. In such a case, it is common in uncertainty theories to take account of this unreliability by a so-called discounting rule. A few discounting rules have been proposed in the framework of imprecise probability theory, but one of the drawback of those rules is that they do not preserve interesting properties (i.e. n-monotonicity) of lower probabilities. Another aspect that only a few of them consider is that source reliability is often dependent of the context, i.e. a source may be more reliable to identify some values than others. In such cases, it is useful to consider contextual discounting, where reliability information is dependent of the variable values. In this paper, we propose such a contextual discounting rule that also preserves some of the interesting mathematical properties a lower probability can have.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility theory and data fusion in poorly informed environments. Control Engineering Practice 2, 811–823 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moral, S., Sagrado, J.: Aggregation of imprecise probabilities. In: BouchonMeunier, B. (ed.) Aggregation and Fusion of Imperfect Information, pp. 162–188. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mercier, D., Quost, B., Denoeux, T.: Refined modeling of sensor reliability in the bellief function framework using contextual discounting. Information Fusion 9, 246–258 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karlsson, A., Johansson, R., Andler, S.F.: On the behavior of the robust bayesian combination operator and the significance of discounting. In: ISIPTA 2009: Proc. of the Sixth Int. Symp. on Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications, pp. 259–268 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benavoli, A., Antonucci, A.: Aggregating imprecise probabilistic knowledge. In: ISIPTA 2009: Proc. of the Sixth Int. Symp. on Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications, pp. 31–40 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miranda, E.: A survey of the theory of coherent lower previsions. Int. J. of Approximate Reasoning 48, 628–658 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Smets, P., Kennes, R.: The transferable belief model. Artificial Intelligence 66, 191–234 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Walley, P.: Statistical reasoning with imprecise Probabilities. Chapman & Hall, New York (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty. Plenum Press, New York (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Shafer, G.: A mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, New Jersey (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferson, S., Ginzburg, L., Kreinovich, V., Myers, D., Sentz, K.: Constructing probability boxes and dempster-shafer structures. Technical report, Sandia National Laboratories (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chateauneuf, A., Jaffray, J.Y.: Some characterizations of lower probabilities and other monotone capacities through the use of Mobius inversion. Mathematical Social Sciences 17(3), 263–283 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Miranda, E., Couso, I., Gil, P.: Extreme points of credal sets generated by 2-alternating capacities. I. J. of Approximate Reasoning 33, 95–115 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Bronevich, A., Augustin, T.: Approximation of coherent lower probabilities by 2-monotone measures. In: ISIPTA 2009: Proc. of the Sixth Int. Symp. on Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications, SIPTA , pp. 61–70 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Denoeux, T., Smets, P.: Classification using belief functions: the relationship between the case-based and model-based approaches. IEEE Trans. on Syst., Man and Cybern. B 36(6), 1395–1406 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de Campos, L., Huete, J., Moral, S.: Probability intervals: a tool for uncertain reasoning. I. J. of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 2, 167–196 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. de Cooman, G., Troffaes, M., Miranda, E.: n-monotone lower previsions and lower integrals. In: Cozman, F., Nau, R., Seidenfeld, T. (eds.) Proc. 4th International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Destercke, S. (2010). A New Contextual Discounting Rule for Lower Probabilities. In: Hüllermeier, E., Kruse, R., Hoffmann, F. (eds) Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. Applications. IPMU 2010. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 81. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14058-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14058-7_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14057-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14058-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics