Skip to main content

Drei Oligopolexperimente

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Selten School of Behavioral Economics

Abstract

Reinhard Selten’s work marks the beginning of the experimental analysis of oligopoly. Indeed, his research includes both one of the first experiments on quantity competition and the first one on price competition. In the aftermath a very rich literature has emerged, dealing both with theory-based issues linked to the many oligopoly models that appeared as the result of the application of game-theory to industrial organization and with more applied questions that came out of the economic analysis of regulation and anti-trust issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The four equilibrium quantity triplets are (4, 5, 7), (5, 5, 6), (5, 6, 7) and (4, 6, 6), with the third of these only being a weak equilibrium.

  2. 2.

    The other substantial motive groups are fighting motives, attempts at influencing the price to increase profits, exploration around previous decisions, output limitation due to liquidity constraints, attempts at fixing a price equal to average price, retreat and optimization according to accounting. For details about these motives please see the original article, which also contains a discussion of how different motives are used at different points in time.

References

  • Abbink K, Brandts J (2005) Price competition under uncertainty: a laboratory analysis. Econ Inq 43:636–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbink K, Brandts J (2008) 24. Pricing in Bertrand competition with increasing marginal costs. Games Econ Behav 63:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbink K, Brandts J (2009) Collusion in growing and shrinking markets: empirical evidence from experimental duopolies. In: Hinloopen J, Normann H-T (eds) Experiments for antitrust policies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbink K, Brandts J, Herrmann B, Orzen H (2010) Inter-group conflict and intra-group punishment in an experimental contest game. Am Econ Rev 100:420–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong M, Huck S (2010) Behavioral economics as applied to firms: a primer. working paper, University College London, Jan 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosman R, Hennig-Schmidt H, Van Winden F (2006) Exploring group decision making in a power-to-take experiment. Exp Econ 9:35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandts J, Pezanis-Christou P, Schram A (2008) Competition with forward contracts: a laboratory analysis motivated by electricity market design. Econ J 118:192–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Kruse J, Rassenti S, Reynolds S, Smith V (1994) Bertrand-Edgeworth competition in experimental markets. Econometrica 62:343–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin EH (1948) An experimental imperfect market. J Polit Econ 56:95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper D, Kagel J (2005) Are two heads better than one? Team versus individual play in signaling games. Am Econ Rev 95:477–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dastidar KG (1995) On the existence of pure strategy Bertrand equilibrium. Econ Theory 5:19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis D, Holt C (1994) Market power and mergers in laboratory markets with posted prices. Rand J Econ 25:467–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufwenberg M, Gneezy U (2000) Price competition and market concentration: an experimental study. Int J Game Theory 18:7–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Feri F, Irlenbusch B, Sutter M (forthcoming) Efficiency gains from team-based coordination – Large scale experimental evidence. Am Econ Rev (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilet J, Schram A, Sonnemans J (forthcoming) Cartel formation and pricing: the effect of managerial decision making rules. Int J Indust Organ (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen RG (1988) Auctions with endogenous quantity. Rand J Econ 19:44–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoggatt AC (1959) An experimental business game. Behav Sci 4:192–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt C (1985) An experimental test of the consistent-conjectures hypothesis. Am Econ Rev 75:314–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Huck S, Normann H-T, Oechssler J (2004) Two are few and four are many: number effects in experimental oligopolies. J Econ Behav Organ 53:435–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory. Econometrica 47:263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keser C (1993) Some results of experimental duopoly markets with demand inertia. J Ind Econ 41:133–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel R, Vriend NJ (1999) An experimental study of adaptive behavior in an Oligopolistix market game. J Evol Econ 9:27–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plott C, Smith V (1978) An experimental examination of two exchange institutions. Rev Econ Stud 45:133–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi FM (1957) Top management decision simulation. The AMA Approach, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauermann H, Selten R (1959) Ein oligopolexperiment. Z Gesamte Staatswiss 115:427–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten R (1967) Ein Oligopolexperiment mit Preisvariation und Investition. In: Sauermann H (ed) Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung. J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen, pp 103–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Spulber DF (1995) Bertrand competition when rivals’ costs are unknown. J Ind Econ 43:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Abbink .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abbink, K., Brandts, J. (2010). Drei Oligopolexperimente. In: Sadrieh, A., Ockenfels, A. (eds) The Selten School of Behavioral Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13983-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13983-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13982-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13983-3

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics