Advertisement

Abstract

While the Internet is tremendously scalable, it is based on simplistic design that provides only egalitarian best effort service for all traffic types. Two architectural extensions have been proposed, namely Intserv and Diffserv, to enhance the service architecture. While Integrated Services (Intserv) can provide hard Quality of Service (QoS) requirements (delay and bandwidth) to individual flows end to end, its per-flow mechanisms and signaling overhead make it too complex to be readily deployed in the Internet core. On the other hand, Differentiated Services (Diffserv) restores the scalability of the Internet by dropping per flow mechanisms and merging of flows into aggregates. The price paid is the lack of flexible and powerful services at flow granularity levels.

References

  1. 1.
    Charny, A., Le Boudec, J.-Y.: Delay bounds in a network with aggregate scheduling. In: Proceedings of Quality of Future Internet Services, pp. 1–13 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cobb, J.A.: Preserving quality of service guarantees in spite of flow aggregation. IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking 10(1), 43–53 (2002)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goyal, P., Lam, S.S., Vin, H.M.: Determining end-to-end delay bounds in heterogeneous networks. Multimedia System 5(3), 157–163 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jiang, Y.: Delay bounds for a network of guaranteed rate servers with fifo aggregation. Computer Networks 40(6), 683–694 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stoica, I.: Stateless Core: A Scalable Approach for Quality of Service in the Internet. PhD thesis, CMU, Pittsburgh, USA (December 2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Addisu Eshete
    • 1
  • Yuming Jiang
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Quantifiable Quality of Service in Communication SystemsNorwegian University of Science and Technology 

Personalised recommendations