Advertisement

Wireless Handoff Optimization: A Comparison of IEEE 802.11r and HOKEY

  • Kashif Nizam Khan
  • Jinat Rehana
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6164)

Abstract

IEEE 802.11 or Wi-Fi has long been the most widely deployed technology for wireless broadband Internet access, yet it is increasingly facing competition from other technologies such as packet-switched cellular data. End user expectations and demands have grown towards a more mobile and agile network. At one end, users demand more and more mobility and on the other end, they expect a good QoS which is sufficient to meet the needs of VoIP and streaming video. However, as the 4G technologies start knocking at doors, 802.11 is being questioned for its mobility and QoS (Quality of Service). Unnecessary handoffs and re-authentication during handoffs result in higher latencies. Recent research shows that if the handoff latency is high, services like VoIP experience excessive jitter. Bulk of the handoff latency is caused by security mechanisms, such as the 4-way handshake and, in particular, EAP authentication to a remote authentication server. IEEE 802.11r and HandOver KEY (HOKEY) are protocol enhancements that have been introduced to mitigate these challenges and to manage fast and secure handoffs in a seamless manner. 802.11r extends the 802.11 base specification to support fast handoff in the MAC protocol. On the other hand, HOKEY is a suite of protocols standardized by IETF to support fast handoffs. This paper analyzes the applicability of 802.11r and HOKEY solutions to enable fast authentication and fast handoffs. It also presents an overview of the fast handoff solutions proposed in some recent research.

Keywords

Mobile Node Medium Access Control Access Point Medium Access Control Protocol Medium Access Control Layer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    I. S. 802.11r TM. IEEE Standard for Information Technology - Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems - Local and Metropolitan Area Networks - Specific Requirement. Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specification. Amendment 3: Specifications for Operation in Additional Regulatory Domains (July 2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aura, T., Roe, M.: Reducing Reauthentication Delay in Wireless Networks. In: SECURECOMM 2005: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Security and Privacy for Emerging Areas in Communications Networks, pp. 139–148. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bangolae, S., Bell, C., Qi, E.: Performance Study of Fast BSS Transition using IEEE 802.11r. In: IWCMC 2006: Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Wireless communications and mobile computing, pp. 737–742. ACM, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bargh, M.S., Hulsebosch, R.J., Eertink, E.H., Prasad, A., Wang, H., Schoo, P.: Fast Authentication Methods for Handovers between IEEE 802.11 Wireless Lans. In: WMASH 2004: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international workshop on Wireless mobile applications and services on WLAN hotspots, pp. 51–60. ACM, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bianchi, G.: Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802.11 Distributed Coordination Function. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 18(3), 535–547 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clancy, T.: Secure Handover in Enterprise WLANs: CAPWAP, HOKEY, and IEEE 802.11r. IEEE Wireless Communications 15(5), 80–85 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goransson, P., Greenlaw, R.: Secure Roaming in 802.11 Networks. Newnes (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Salowey, V.J., Nakhjiri, M., Dondeti, L.: Specification for the Derivation of Root Keys from an Extended Master Session Key(EMSK). RFC 5295, The Internet Engineering Task Force (August 2008), http://ietf.org/rfc/rfc5295.txt
  9. 9.
    Pack, S., Choi, Y.: Fast Handoff Scheme Based on Mobility Prediction in Public Wireless LAN Systems. IEE Proceedings Communications 151(5), 489–495 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raghavendra, R., Belding, E.M., Papagiannaki, K., Almeroth, K.C.: Understanding Handoffs in Large IEEE 802.11 Wireless Networks. In: IMC 2007: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pp. 333–338. ACM, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shin, M., Mishra, A., Arbaugh, W.A.: Improving the Latency of 802.11 Hand-offs using Neighbor Graphs. In: MobiSys 2004: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services, pp. 70–83. ACM, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shin, S., Forte, A.G., Rawat, A.S., Schulzrinne, H.: Reducing Mac Layer Handoff Latency in IEEE 802.11 Wireless LANs. In: MobiWac 2004: Proceedings of the second international workshop on Mobility management & wireless access protocols, pp. 19–26. ACM, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clancy, T., Nakhjiri, M., Narayanan, V., Dondeti, L.: Handover Key Management and Re-Authentication Problem Statement. RFC 5169, The Internet Engineering Task Force (March 2008), http://ietf.org/rfc/rfc5169.txt
  14. 14.
    Velayos, H., Karlsson, G.: Techniques to Reduce the IEEE 802.11b Handoff Time, vol. 7, pp. 3844–3848 (June 2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Narayanan, V., Dondeti, L.: EAP Extensions for EAP Re-authentication Protocol (ERP). RFC 5296, The Internet Engineering Task Force (August 2008), http://ietf.org/rfc/rfc5296.txt
  16. 16.
    Aura, T.: Lecture Notes on Network Security: WLAN Security. Helsinki University of Technology (TKK) & University College London (UCL) (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kashif Nizam Khan
    • 1
  • Jinat Rehana
    • 1
  1. 1.Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Helsinki University of Technology, TKK 

Personalised recommendations