Skip to main content

A Process with Sufficient Speed: Incentives for Progress

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Process Management

Abstract

So far, we have argued that process management is characterized by openness. The main stakeholders are invited to participate in a process and are involved in drawing up the agenda. Openness, however, is not without risk for these stakeholders. They can perceive the process as a funnel trap: once they have joined, they may feel that they are forced in a certain direction without being able to leave the process. It is therefore important that parties’ core values are protected. For the sake of these core values, parties are offered room at crucial moments. For instance, they are not required to commit to the result of the process beforehand, and they are offered an exit option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See for instance Field [5], in which the Hartford case is particularly relevant. Research Parker and Wragg [10] points in that direction. The establishment of a counternetwork that is positioned opposite the existing network strongly affects the decision making. See also Huygen [6, p. 136], Rein and Schon [11, p. 8] and Lakoff [9, p. 9].

  2. 2.

    See also Williamson [17] for comparison.

References

  1. Brandenburger BJ, Nalebuff AM (1997) Coopetition. Bantam Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Bruijn JA (2005) Roles for unilateral action in networks. Int J Pub Sect Manag 18(4):318–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dixit A, Nalebuff BJ (1991) Thinking strategically. The competitive edge in business politics and every day lifes. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eckley N (2002) Dependable dynamism: lessons for designing scientific assessment processes in consensus negotiations. Glob Environ Change 12(1):15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Field CG (1997) Building consensus for affordable housing. Hous Policy Debate 4:801–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huygen J (1995) Culturele en strategische dimensies in besluitvorming: Techno-politiek en het GBA-project. In: ’t Hart P, Metselaar M, Verbeek B. Publieke besluitvorming. Den Haag, VUGA, pp 125–148

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koffijberg J (2005) Getijden van beleid: omslagpunten in de volkshuisvesting. Over de rol van hiërarchie en netwerken bij grote veranderingen. IOS Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kotter JP (1995) Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harv Manag Rev 73(2):59–67

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lakoff RT (2000) The language war. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  10. Parker G, Wragg A (1999) Networks, agency and (de)stabilization: the issue of navigation on the River Wye, UK. J Environ Plan Manag 42(4):471–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rein M, Schon DA (1986) Frame-reflective policy discourse. Beleidsanalyse 15(4):4–18

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sebenius JK (1991) Designing negotiations toward a new regime. The case of global warming. Int Sec 15(4):110–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sparks A (1995) Tomorrow is another country: the inside story of South Africa’s negotiated revolution. Struik, Sandton

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van den Bosch FAJ, Postma S (1995) ‘Strategic stakeholder management: a description of the decision-making process of a mega-investment project at Europe’s biggest oil refinery. Shell Nederland Raffinaderij BV. Rotterdam. In: Management Reports Series 242, Erasmus Universiteit/Rotterdam School of Management, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weening HM (2001) Het vliegwiel vervlogen? Een evaluatie van het verloop en de aanpak van het proces rond de Kenniswijk, Delft, commissioned by Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management

    Google Scholar 

  17. Williamson OE (1975) Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernst F. ten Heuvelhof .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Bruijn, H., ten Heuvelhof, E.F., in ‘t Veld, R. (2010). A Process with Sufficient Speed: Incentives for Progress. In: Process Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13941-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics