Skip to main content

Applications and Examples

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Push-Pull Tests for Site Characterization

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Earth System Sciences ((LNESS,volume 144))

  • 664 Accesses

Abstract

Leap and Kaplan (1988) and Hall et al. (1991) presented a type of push-pull test for determining regional groundwater velocity and effective porosity if the hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer and local the hydraulic gradient are known. The hydraulic conductivity could be determined by a pumping test conducted in the same well at the same time as the push-pull tracer test described here; the hydraulic gradient could be determined from water level measurements in a set of nearby wells surrounding and including the push-pull test well. The procedure involves injecting a constant-concentration test solution containing a nonreactive tracer into the aquifer using a single well, allowing the test solution to drift downgradient with the regional groundwater flow, and then extracting the tracer solution/groundwater mixture from the same well by continuous pumping to determine the temporal displacement of the tracer center of mass. The basic equations (using the notation of Hall et al. 1991) are:

$$ {\hbox{q}} = \frac{\text{Qt}}{{{{\pi b}}{{\hbox{d}}^{{2}}}{\hbox{KI}}}} $$
$$ {\hbox{n}} = \frac{{\pi {\text{b}}{{\text{K}}^{{2}}}{{\text{I}}^{{2}}}{{\text{d}}^{{2}}}}}{\hbox{Qt}} $$

where q is the apparent groundwater (Darcy) velocity, n is effective porosity, Q is the extraction pumping rate, t is the time elapsed from the start of extraction pumping until the centroid of the tracer mass has been extracted, b is the aquifer saturated thickness, d is the elapsed time from the end of tracer injection until the centroid of the tracer mass is extracted (drift time + t), K is the saturated hydraulic conductivity, and I is the local hydraulic gradient. Obviously, uncertainties in computed values of q and n will reflect uncertainties in values of K and I.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Davis BM, Istok JD, Semprini L (2002) Push-pull partitioning tracer tests using radon-222 to quantify non-aqueous phase liquid contamination. J Contam Hydrol 58:129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis BD, Istok JD, Semprini L (2005) Numerical simulations of radon as an in situ partitioning tracer for quantifying NAPL contamination using push–pull tests. J Contam Hydrol 78:87–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drever JI, McKee CR (1980) The push-pull test a method of evaluating formation adsorption parameters for predicting the environmental effects on in-situ coal gasification and uranium recovery. In Situ 4(3):181–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Field JA, Sawyer TE, Schroth MH, Humphrey MD, Istok JD (2000) Effect of cation exchange on surfactant-enhanced solubilization of trichloroethene. J Contam Hydrol 46:131–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelhar LW, Collins MA (1971) General analysis of longitudinal dispersion in nonuniform flow. Water Resour 7(6):1511–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hageman KJ, Istok JD, Field JA, Buscheck TE, Semprini L (2001) In situ anaerobic transformation of trichlorofluoroethene in trichloroethene-contaminated groundwater. Environ Sci Technol 35(9):1729–1735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hageman KJ, Field JA, Istok JD, Schroth MH (2003) “Forced mass balance” technique for estimating in situ transformation rates of sorbing solutes in groundwater. Environ Sci Technol 37:3920–3925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty R, Schroth MH, Istok JD (1998) Simplified method of “push-pull” test data analysis for determining in situ reaction rate coefficients. Ground Water 36(2):314–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall SH, Luttrell SP, Cronin WE (1991) A method for estimating effective porosity and ground-water velocity. Ground Water 29(2):171–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Istok JD, Field JA, Schroth MH, Sawyer TE, Humphrey MD (1999) Laboratory and field investigation of surfactant sorption using single-well, “push-pull” tests. Ground Water 37(4):589–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Istok JD, Field JA, Schroth MH (2001) In situ determination of subsurface microbial enzyme kinetics. Ground Water 39(3):348–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Istok JD, Senko JM, Krumholz LR, Bogle MA, Peacock A, Chang YJ, White DC (2004) In situ bioreduction of technetium and uranium in a nitrate-contaminated aquifer. Environ Sci Technol 38:468–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Istok JD, Semprini L (2004) Push-pull tests for assessing in situ aerobic cometabolism. Ground Water 42(3):329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leap DI, Kaplan PG (1988) A single-well tracing method for estimating regional advective velocity in a confined aquifer: theory and preliminary laboratory verification. Water Resour Res 24(7):993–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickens JF, Grisak GE (1981) Scale-dependent dispersion in a stratified granular aquifer. Water Resour Res 17(4):1191–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reusseur DE, Istok JD, Beller HR, Field JA (2002) In situ transformation of deuterated toluene and xylene to benzylsuccinic acid analogues in BTEX-contaminated aquifers. Environ Sci Technol 36:4127–4134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroth MH, Istok JD, Conner GT, Hyman MR, Haggerty R, O’Reilly KT (1998) Spatial variability in in situ aerobic respiration and denitrification rates in a petroleum-contaminated aquifer. Ground Water 36(6):924–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass MF, Kitanidis PK (1998) A method to infer in situ reaction rates from push-pull experiments. Ground Water 36(4):645–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urmann K, Gonzalez-Gil G, Schroth MH, Hofer M, Zeyer J (2005) New field method: gas push-pull tests for the in-situ quantification of microbial activities in the vadose zone. Environ Sci Technol 39(1):304–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercado A (1966) Recharge and mining tests at Yavne 20 well field. Underground wate4r storage study tech. report 12. Publ. 611. Tahalp Water Plann for Isr., Tel Aviv

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth MH, Istok JD (2004) Approximate Solution for Solute Transport During Spherical Flow Push-Pull Tests. Ground Water Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 280–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Jury WA, Roth K (1990) Transfer functions and solute movement through soils: Theory and applications. Birkhauser, Basel,Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth MH, Istok JD, Haggerty R (2001) In situ evaluation of solute retardation using single-well push-pull tests. Adv Water Resour 24:105–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis E, Reed R, Dolan M, Semprini L, Istok JD, Field JA (2005) Reductive dechlorination of the vinyl chloride surrogate chlorofluoroethene in TCE-contaminated groundwater. Environ Sci Technol 39:6777–6785

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan David Istok .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Istok, J.D. (2013). Applications and Examples. In: Push-Pull Tests for Site Characterization. Lecture Notes in Earth System Sciences, vol 144. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13920-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics