Skip to main content

Reader Fatigue Interpreting Mammograms

  • Conference paper
Digital Mammography (IWDM 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6136))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A number of studies have demonstrated that radiologists can become fatigued after reading cases for a number of hours. Some of these studies have demonstrated that there are associated decreases in observer performance (i.e., reduced accuracy), but mammographic reading has not been a focus of any of these studies. Based on these recent findings regarding decreases in performance as a function of time of day and/or number of hours reading, this retrospective study examined data from a variety of mammography studies in which readers participated in two sessions – once in the morning and once in the afternoon. The ROC Az data from these studies were compared for statistical differences between morning and afternoon reading. Overall there was a small yet significant (t = 2.365, p = 0.0277) between morning and afternoon diagnostic performance, with performance being degraded in the afternoon. These data suggest that reader fatigue may impact mammography interpretation performance, although more formal studies are required to verify these findings with a prospective study since this retrospective analysis did have limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Krupinski, E.A., Berbaum, K.S.: Impact of visual fatigue on observer performance. Proc. SPIE Med. Imag. 7263, 72631O-1 – 9 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ebenholtz, S.M.: Oculomotor systems and perception. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. MacKenzie, W.: On asthenopia or weak-sightedness. Edinburgh J. Med. & Surg. 60, 73–103 (1843)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heron, G., Charman, W.N., Gray, L.S.: Accommodation responses and ageing. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 40, 2872–288 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ishiyama, M., Tsunoda-Shimizu, H., Kikuchi, M., Saida, Y., Hiramatsu, S.: Comparison of reading time between screen-film mammography and soft-copied, full-field digital mammography. Breast Cancer 16, 58–61

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gale, A.G., Murray, D., Millar, K., Worthington, B.S.: Circadian variation in radiology. In: Gale, A.G., Johnson, F. (eds.) Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research, Elsevier Science Publishers, London (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krupinski, E.A., Berbaum, K.S.: Measurement of visual strain in radiologists. Acad. Radiol. 16, 947–950 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krupinski, E.A., Berbaum, K.S.: Does reader visual fatigue impact interpretation accuracy. Proc. SPIE Med. Imag., 7627 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ahsberg, E.: Dimensions of fatigue in different workplace populations. Scandinavian J. Psych. 41, 231–241 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahsberg, E., Gamberale, F., Gustafsson, K.: Perceived fatigue after mental work: an experimental evaluation of a fatigue inventory. Ergonomics 43, 252–268 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., Lilienthal, M.G.: Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Intl. J. Aviation Psych. 3, 203–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Lilienthal, M.G., Berbaum, K.S., Hettinger, L.J.: Profile analysis of simulator sickness symptoms: application to virtual environment systems. Presence 1, 295–301 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kennedy, R.S., Lilienthal, M.G., Berbaum, K.S., Baltzley, D.R., McCauley, M.E.: Simulator sickness in US Navy flight simulators. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 60, 10–16 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krupinski, E.A., Roehrig, H., Furukawa, T.: Influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search. Acad. Radiol. 6, 411–418 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krupinski, E.A., Roehrig, H.: The influence of a perceptually linearized display on observer performance and visual search. Acad. Radiol. 7, 8–13 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krupinski, E.A., Johnson, J., Roehrig, H., Nafziger, J., Lubin, J.: On-axis and off-axis viewing of images on CRT displays and LCDs: observer performance and vision model predictions. Acad. Radiol. 12, 957–964 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krupinski, E.A., Johnson, J., Roehrig, H., Engstrom, M., Fan, J., Nafziger, J., Lubin, J., Dallas, W.J.: Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of MTF compensation. Acad. Radiol. 10, 1030–1035 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Krupinski, E.A., Kallergi, M.: Choosing a radiology workstation: technical and clinical considerations. Radiology 242, 671–682 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vertinsky, T., Forster, B.: Prevalence of eye strain among radiologists: influence of viewing variables on symptoms. AJR. Am. J. Radiol. 184, 681–686 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goo, J.M., Choi, J.Y., Im, J.G., Lee, H.J., et al.: Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs. Radiology 232, 762–766 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Krupinski, E.A. (2010). Reader Fatigue Interpreting Mammograms. In: Martí, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, R. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6136. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13665-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13666-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics