Abstract
Both interactive thresholding tools and human visual assessment have been related to the risk of developing breast cancer. In this paper we explore the relationship between human assessment of area of dense tissue and the actual thickness of tissue in the breast by using a volumetric density technique to compute areas of dense tissue, varying the threshold below which areas of low density are discounted and observing the correlation with visual assessment of density at different thresholds. Based on analysis of thresholds used in the automated method, radiologists’ definition of a dense pixel is one in which the percentage of glandular tissue is between 10% and 20% of the total thickness of the compressed breast at that point.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Wolfe, J.N.: Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer 37(5), 2486–2492 (1976)
Boyd, N.F., Lockwood, G.A., Byng, J.W., Tritchler, D.L., Yaffe, M.J.: Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol.Biomarkers Prev. 7(12), 1133–1144 (1998)
Li, H., Giger, M.L., Olopade, O.I., Margolis, A., Lan, L., Chinander, M.: Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms. Acad. Radiol. 12(7), 863–873 (2005)
van Engeland, S., Snoeren, P.R., Huisman, H., Boetes, C., Karssemeijer, N.: Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25(3), 273–282 (2006)
Highnam, R., Pan, X., Warren, R., Jeffreys, M., Davey Smith, G., Brady, M.: Breast composition using retrospective standard mammogram form. Physics in Medicine and Biology 51, 2695–2713 (2006)
Boyd, N.F., Byng, J.W., Jong, R.A., Fishell, E.K., Little, L.E., Miller, A.B., et al.: Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J.Natl.Cancer Inst. 87(9), 670–675 (1995)
Diffey, J.L., Hufton, A.P., Astley, S.M.: A New Stepwedge for the Volumetric Measurement of Breast Density. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds.) IWDM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4046, pp. 1–9. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Bland, J.M., Altman, D.: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476), 307–310 (1986)
Kinoshita, S.K., Azevedo-Marques, P.M., Pereira Jr., R.R., Rodrigues, J.A.H.,, Rangayyan, R.M.: Radon-Domain Detection of the Nipple and the Pectoral Muscle in Mammograms. Journal of Digital Imaging 21(1), 37–49 (2008)
Petroudi, S., Brady, J.M.: Automatic Nipple Detection on Mammograms. In: Ellis, R.E., Peters, T.M. (eds.) MICCAI 2003. LNCS, vol. 2879, pp. 971–972. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Sukha, A., Berks, M., Morris, J., Boggis, C., Wilson, M., Barr, N., Astley, S.: Visual Assessment of Density in Digital Mammograms. In: Marti, J., et al. (eds.) Digital Mammography (2010)
Duffy, S., et al.: Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and the importance of the craniocaudal view. Br. Can. Research. 10(4) (2008)
Boyd, N.F., Byng, J.W., Jong, R.A., Fishell, E.K., Little, L.E., Miller, A.B., et al.: Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 87(9), 670–675 (1995)
Patel, H.G., Astley, S.M., Hufton, A.P., Harvie, M., Hagan, K., Marchant, T.E., Hillier, V., Howell, A., Warren, R., Boggis, C.R.M.: Automated breast tissue measurement of women at increased risk of breast cancer. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds.) IWDM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4046, pp. 131–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jeffries-Chung, C. et al. (2010). Automated Assessment of Area of Dense Tissue in the Breast: A Comparison with Human Estimation. In: MartĂ, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., MartĂ, R. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6136. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13665-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13666-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)