Skip to main content

Automated Assessment of Area of Dense Tissue in the Breast: A Comparison with Human Estimation

  • Conference paper
Book cover Digital Mammography (IWDM 2010)

Abstract

Both interactive thresholding tools and human visual assessment have been related to the risk of developing breast cancer. In this paper we explore the relationship between human assessment of area of dense tissue and the actual thickness of tissue in the breast by using a volumetric density technique to compute areas of dense tissue, varying the threshold below which areas of low density are discounted and observing the correlation with visual assessment of density at different thresholds. Based on analysis of thresholds used in the automated method, radiologists’ definition of a dense pixel is one in which the percentage of glandular tissue is between 10% and 20% of the total thickness of the compressed breast at that point.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wolfe, J.N.: Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer 37(5), 2486–2492 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd, N.F., Lockwood, G.A., Byng, J.W., Tritchler, D.L., Yaffe, M.J.: Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol.Biomarkers Prev. 7(12), 1133–1144 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, H., Giger, M.L., Olopade, O.I., Margolis, A., Lan, L., Chinander, M.: Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms. Acad. Radiol. 12(7), 863–873 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. van Engeland, S., Snoeren, P.R., Huisman, H., Boetes, C., Karssemeijer, N.: Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25(3), 273–282 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Highnam, R., Pan, X., Warren, R., Jeffreys, M., Davey Smith, G., Brady, M.: Breast composition using retrospective standard mammogram form. Physics in Medicine and Biology 51, 2695–2713 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyd, N.F., Byng, J.W., Jong, R.A., Fishell, E.K., Little, L.E., Miller, A.B., et al.: Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J.Natl.Cancer Inst. 87(9), 670–675 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Diffey, J.L., Hufton, A.P., Astley, S.M.: A New Stepwedge for the Volumetric Measurement of Breast Density. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds.) IWDM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4046, pp. 1–9. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bland, J.M., Altman, D.: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476), 307–310 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kinoshita, S.K., Azevedo-Marques, P.M., Pereira Jr., R.R., Rodrigues, J.A.H.,, Rangayyan, R.M.: Radon-Domain Detection of the Nipple and the Pectoral Muscle in Mammograms. Journal of Digital Imaging 21(1), 37–49 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Petroudi, S., Brady, J.M.: Automatic Nipple Detection on Mammograms. In: Ellis, R.E., Peters, T.M. (eds.) MICCAI 2003. LNCS, vol. 2879, pp. 971–972. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sukha, A., Berks, M., Morris, J., Boggis, C., Wilson, M., Barr, N., Astley, S.: Visual Assessment of Density in Digital Mammograms. In: Marti, J., et al. (eds.) Digital Mammography (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duffy, S., et al.: Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and the importance of the craniocaudal view. Br. Can. Research. 10(4) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boyd, N.F., Byng, J.W., Jong, R.A., Fishell, E.K., Little, L.E., Miller, A.B., et al.: Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 87(9), 670–675 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel, H.G., Astley, S.M., Hufton, A.P., Harvie, M., Hagan, K., Marchant, T.E., Hillier, V., Howell, A., Warren, R., Boggis, C.R.M.: Automated breast tissue measurement of women at increased risk of breast cancer. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds.) IWDM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4046, pp. 131–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jeffries-Chung, C. et al. (2010). Automated Assessment of Area of Dense Tissue in the Breast: A Comparison with Human Estimation. In: MartĂ­, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., MartĂ­, R. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6136. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13665-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13666-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics