Skip to main content

Benefits of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and Rhizobia in Agriculture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Plant Growth and Health Promoting Bacteria

Abstract

The rhizosphere is the volume of soil under the influence of plants roots, where very important and intensive microbe–plant interactions take place. These interactions can both significantly influence plant growth and crop yields and have biotechnological applications. The rhizosphere harbors a diverse community of microorganisms that interact and compete with each other and with the plant root. The activity of some of the members of this community affects the growth and the physiology of the others, as well as the physical and chemical properties of the soil. Among all these interactions, those resulting in symbiotic and non-symbiotic nitrogen fixation are considerably important. In recent years, the use of bacteria (rhizobacteria) to promote plant growth has increased in several regions of the world and has acquired relevant importance in developing countries that are the producers of raw materials for food. Rhizobacteria can affect plant growth by producing and releasing secondary metabolites, which either decrease or prevent the deleterious effects of phytopathogenic organisms in the rhizosphere, and/or by facilitating the availability and uptake of certain nutrients from the root environment. Significant increases in the growth and yield of agriculturally important crops in response to inoculation with rhizobacteria have been reported. This practical application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria is the main focus of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adesemoye AO, Torbert HA, Kloepper JW (2008) Enhanced plant nutrient use efficiency with PGPR and AMF in an integrated nutrient management system. Can J Microbiol 54:876–886

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adesemoye AO, Torbert HA, Kloepper JW (2009) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microb Ecol 58(4):921–929

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amir HG, Shamsuddin ZH, Halimi MS, Marziah M, Ramlan MF (2005) Enhancement in nutrient accumulation and growth of oil palm seedlings caused by PGPR under field nursery conditions. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 36:2059–2066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aseri GK, Jain N, Panwar J, Rao AV, Meghwal PR (2008) Biofertilizers improve plant growth, fruit yield, nutrition, metabolism and rhizosphere enzyme activities of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) in Indian Thar Desert. Sci Hortic 117:130–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson D, Watson CA (2000) The beneficial rhizosphere: a dynamic entity. Appl Soil Ecol 15:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ, van Loon LC (2007) Induced systemic resistance by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology 97:239–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barassi CA, Ayrault G, Creus CM, Sueldo RJ, Sobrero MT (2006) Seed inoculation with Azospirillum mitigates NaCl effects on lettuce. Sci Hortic 109:8–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barea JM, Andrade G, Bianciotto V, Dowling D, Lohrke S, Bonfante P, O'Gara F, Azcon-Anguilar C (1998) Impact on arbuscular mycorrhiza formation of Pseudomonas strains used as inoculants for biocontrol of soil-borne fungal plant pathogens. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:2304–2307

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bashan Y, Holguin G, de Bashan LE (2004) Azospirillum–plant relationships: physiological, molecular, agricultural, and environmental advances (1997–2003). Can J Microbiol 50:521–577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berg G (2009) Plant–microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84:11–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beringer JE (1986) Plant–microbe interactions. In: Silver S (ed) Biotechnology: potentials and limitations. Springer, Berlin, pp 259–273

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bodelier PLE, Wijlhuizen AG, Blom CWPM, Laanbroek HJ (1997) Effects of photoperiod on growth of and denitrification by Pseudomonas chlororaphis in the root zone of Glyceria maxima, studied in a gnotobiotic microcosm. Plant Soil 190:91–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton GW, Nester EW, Gordon MP (1986) Plant phenolic compounds induce expression of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens loci needed for virulence. Science 232:983–985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonfante P (2003) Plants, mycorrhizal fungi, and endobacteria: a dialog among cells and genomes. Biol Bull 204:215–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruehl GW (1987) Soil-borne plant pathogens. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero-Mellado J, Onofre-Lemus J, Estrada-de los Santos P, Martinez-Aguilar L (2007) The tomato rhizosphere, an environment rich in nitrogen-fixing Burkholderia species with capabilities of interest for agriculture and bioremediation. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5308–5319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carletti SM, Llorente BE, Rodríguez Cáceres EA, Tandecarz JS (1998) Jojoba inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense stimulates in vitro root formation. Plant Tiss Cult Biotech 4:165–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Carletti SM, Murray A, Llorente BE, Rodríguez Cáceres EA, Puglia ML (2006) Propagación de dos gramíneas ornamentales: Muhlenbergia dumosa y Eustachys distychophylla inoculadas con Azospirillum brasilense. In: UN La Plata, MAA, INTA San Pedro (eds) 3 Congress Argentine of floriculture and 8 National J of flowers. Buenos Aires, pp 380−383

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassán F, Perrig D, Sgroy V, Masciarelli O, Penna C, Luna V (2009) Azospirillum brasilense Az39 and Bradyrhizobium japonicum E109, inoculated singly or in combination, promote seed germination and early seedling growth in corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.). Eur J Soil Biol 45:28–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coenye T, Vandamme P (2003) Diversity and significance of Burkholderia species occupying diverse ecological niches. Environ Microbiol 5:719–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clément C, Barka EA (2005) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4951–4959

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Correa OS, Montecchia MS, Berti MF, Fernández Ferrari MC, Pucheu NL, Kerber NL, García AF (2009) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BNM122, a potential microbial biocontrol agent applied on soybean seeds, causes a minor impact on rhizosphere and soil microbial communities. Appl Soil Ecol 41:185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dardanelli MS, Angelini J, Fabra A (2003) A calcium dependent rhizobia surface protein is involved in the peanut crack entry infection process. Can J Microbiol 49:399–405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dardanelli MS, Fernández FJ, Espuny MR, Rodríguez MA, Soria ME, Gil Serrano AM, Okon Y, Megías M (2008a) Effect of Azospirillum brasilense coinoculated with Rhizobium on Phaseolus vulgaris flavonoids and Nod factor production under salt stress. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2713–2721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dardanelli MS, Rodríguez Navarro DN, Megías M, Okon Y (2008b) Influence of co-inoculation Azospirillum-rhizobia to growth and nitrogen fixation of agronomic legume. In: Cassán FD, García de Salamone I (eds) Azospirillum sp.: cell physiology, plant interactions and agronomic research in Argentine. Argentine Microbiology Society, Buenos Aires, pp 141–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Dardanelli MS, Manyani H, González-Barroso S, Rodríguez-Carvajal MA, Gil-Serrano AM, Espuny MR, López-Baena FJ, Bellogín RA, Megías M, Ollero FJ (2009) Effect of the presence of the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) Chryseobacterium balustinum Aur9 and salt stress in the pattern of flavonoids exuded by soybean roots. Plant Soil 328:483–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Ciocco C, Rodríguez Cáceres E (1994) Field inoculation of Setaria italica with Azospirillum spp in Argentine Humid Pampas. Field Crops Res 37:253–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Zorita M, Baliña RM, Fernández-Canigia M, Perticari A (2004) Field inoculation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and corn (Zea mays L.) with Azospirillum brasilense in the Pampas region, Argentina. In: 22nd Latin-American conference on Rhizobiology and 1st Brazilian conference on biological nitrogen fixation (RELAR). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, p 125

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbelaere S, Croonenborghs A, Thys A, Ptacek D, Vanderleyden J, Dutto P, Labandera-Gonzalez C, Caballero-Mellado J, Aguirre JF, Kapulnik Y, Brener S, Burdman S, Kadouri D, Sarig S, Okon Y (2001) Response of agronomically important crops to inoculation with Azospirillum. Aust J Plant Physiol 28:871–879

    Google Scholar 

  • Dommergues YR, Subba Rao NS (2000) Introduction of N2-fixing trees in non-N2-fixing tropical plantations. In: Subba Rao NS, Dommergues YR (eds) Microbial interactions in agriculture and forestry. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 131–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran JW, Sarrantonio M, Liebig MA (1996) Soil health and sustainability. Adv Agron 56:2–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo VB, Buritya HA, Martínez CR, Chanway CP (2008) Alleviation of drought stress in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by co-inoculation with Paenibacillus polymyxa and Rhizobium tropici. Appl Soil Ecol 40:182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RF, Long SR (1992) Rhizobium-plant signal exchange. Nature 357:655–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flessa H, Ruser R, Dörsch P, Kamp T, Jimenez MA, Munch JC, Beese F (2002) Integrated evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, CH4, N2O) from two farming systems in southern Germany. Agric Ecosyst Environ 91:175–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fravel DR (2005) Commercialization and implementation of biocontrol. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:337–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frink CR, Waggoner PE, Ausubel JH (1999) Nitrogen fertilizer: retrospect and prospect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:1175–1180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardson B (2002) Biological substitutes for pesticides. Trends Biotechnol 20:338–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glick BR (1995) The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria. Can J Microbiol 41:109–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham PH, Vance CP (2000) Nitrogen fixation in perspective: on overview of research and extension needs. Field Crops Res 65:93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groppa MD, Zawoznik MS, Tomaro ML (1998) Effect of co-inoculation with Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Azospirillum brasilense on soybean plants. Eur J Soil Biol 34:75–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruhn P, Goletti F, Yudelman M (2000) Integrated nutrient management, soil fertility, and sustainable agriculture: current issues and future challenges. Food, agriculture, and the environment. Discussion paper 32. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, pp 15–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyaneshwar P, Kumar GN, Parekh LJ, Poole PS (2002) Role of soil microorganisms in improving P nutrition of plants. Plant Soil 245:83–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Han HS, Lee KD (2005) Phosphate and potassium solubilizing bacteria effect on mineral uptake, soil availability, and growth of egg plant. Res J Agric Biol Sci 1:176–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltner L (1904) Über neuere Erfahrungen und Probleme auf dem Gebiete der Bodenbakteriologie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Gründüngung und Brache. Arbeiten der Deutschen Landwirtschaftlichen Gesellschaft 98:59–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A, Campbell CD, Fitter AH (2001) An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus accelerates decomposition and acquires nitrogen directly from organic material. Nature 413:297–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hungria M, Vargas MAT (2000) Environmental factors affecting N2 fixation in grain legumes in the tropics, with an emphasis on Brazil. Field Crops Res 65:151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarecki MK, Parkin TB, Chan ASK, Hatfield JL, Jones R (2008) Greenhouse gas emissions from two soils receiving nitrogen fertilizer and swine manure slurry. J Environ Qual 37:1432–1438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jetiyanon K, Fowler WD, Kloepper JW (2003) Broad-spectrum protection against several pathogens by PGPR mixtures under field conditions. Plant Dis 87:1390–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DL, Hinsinger P (2008) The rhizosphere: complex by design. Plant Soil 312:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy AC (1998) The rhizosphere and spermosphere. In: Sylvia DM, Fuhrmann JJ, Hartel PG, Zuberer DA (eds) Principles and applications of soil microbiology. Prentice Hall, Inc., New Jersey, pp 389–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW, Schroth MN (1978) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on radishes. In: Station de pathologie vegetale et phyto-bacteriologie (ed) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, vol II. Gilbert-Clarey, Tours, pp 879−882

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW, Rodriguez-Kábana R, Zehnder GW, Murphy JF, Sikora E, Fernández C (1999) Plant root–bacterial interactions in biological control of soilborne diseases and potential extension to systemic and foliar diseases. Australas Plant Pathol 28:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW, Ryu CM, Zhang S (2004) Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 94:1259–1266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal S, Tabacchioni S (2009) Ecology and biotechnological potential of Paenibacillus polymyxa: a minireview. Indian J Microbiol 49:2–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lam ST, Gaffney TD (1993) Biological activities of bacteria in plant pathogen control. In: Chet I (ed) Biotechnology in plant disease control. New York, Wiley-Liss Press, pp 291–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Larraburu EE, Carletti SM, Rodríguez Cáceres EA, Llorente BE (2007) Micropropagation of Photinia employing rhizobacteria to promote root development. Plant Cell Rep 26:711–717

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis JA, Papavizas GC (1991) Biocontrol of plant diseases: the approach for tomorrow. Crop Prot 10:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugtenberg BJJ, Dekkers LC (1999) What makes Pseudomonas bacteria rhizosphere competent? Environ Microbiol 1:9–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch JM, Whipps JM (1990) Substrate flow in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 129:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Li XL, Xu H, Han Y, Cai ZC, Yagi K (2007) Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and wheat straw application on CH4 and N2O emissions from a paddy rice field. Australas J Soil Res 45:359–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahaffee WF, Kloepper JW (1994) Applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in sustainable agriculture. In: Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR, Grace PR (eds) Soil biota: management in sustainable farming systems. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahenthiralingam E, Urban TA, Goldberg JB (2005) The multifarious multireplicon Burkholderia cepacia complex. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:144–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mannion AM (1998) Future trends in agriculture: the role of agriculture. Outlook Agric 27:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantelin S, Touraine B (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria and nitrate availability: impacts on root development and nitrate uptake. J Exp Bot 55:27–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin A, Mineau P (1995) The impact of agricultural practices on biodiversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 55:201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell CC, Tu S (2006) Nutrient accumulation and movement from poultry litter. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:2146–2153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mittler R (2006) Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends Plant Sci 11:15–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morris PF, Bone E, Tyler BM (1998) Chemotropic and contact responses of Phytophthora sojae hyphae to soybean isoflavonoids and artificial substrates. Plant Physiol 117:1171–1178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey JP, Dow M, Mark GL, O'Gara F (2004) Are microbes at the root of a solution to world food production? Rational exploitation of interactions between microbes and plants can help to transform agriculture. EMBO Rep 5:922–926

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oerke EC (2005) Crop losses to pests. J Agric Sci 144:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oerke EC, Dehne HW (2004) Safeguarding production: losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop Prot 23:275–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okon Y (1994) Azospirillum/plant associations. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Ongena M, Jacques P (2007) Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol 16:115–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perin L, Martinez-Aguilar L, Castro-Gonzalez R, Estrada-de los Santos P, Cabellos-Avelar T, Guedes HV, Reis VM, Caballero-Mellado J (2006) Diazotrophic Burkholderia species associated with field-grown maize and sugarcane. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:3103–3110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perret X, Staehelin C, Broughton WJ (2000) Molecular basis of symbiotic promiscuity. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:180–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perrott KW, Sarathchandra SU, Dow BW (1992) Seasonal and fertilizer effects on the organic cycle and microbial biomass in a hill country soil under pasture. Australas J Soil Res 30:383–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peters NK, Frost J, Long SR (1986) A plant flavone, luteolin, induces expression of Rhizobium meliloti nodulation genes. Science 233:977–980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raaijmakers JM, Weller DM, Thomashow LS (1997) Frequency of antibiotic-producing Pseudomonas spp. in natural environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:881–887

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raaijmakers JM, Paulitz TC, Steinberg C, Alabouvette C, Moënne-Loccoz Y (2009) The rhizosphere: a playground and battle field for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. Plant Soil 321:341–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rivas R, Gutiérrez C, Abril A, Mateos PF, Martínez-Molina E, Ventosa A, Velázquez E (2005) Paenibacillus rhizosphaerae sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere of Cicer arietinum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1305–1309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Cáceres EA (1982) Improved medium for isolation of Azospirillum spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:990–991

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Cáceres EA, González Anta G, López JR, Di Ciocco C, Pacheco Basurco J, Parada J (1996) Response of field-grown wheat to inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense and Bacillus polymyxa in semiarid region of Argentina. Arid Soil Res Rehab 10:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Cáceres EA, Di Ciocco C, Carletti S (2008) 25 years of research of Azospirillum brasilense Az39 in Argentina. In: Cassán FD, García de Salamone I (eds) Azospirillum sp.: cell physiology, plant interactions and agronomic research in Argentine. Argentine Microbiology Society, Buenos Aires, pp 179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Navarro DN, Dardanelli MS, Ruiz-Sainz JE (2007) Attachment of bacteria to the roots of higher plants. FEMS Microbiol Lett 272:127–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romero D, de Vicente A, Rakotoaly RV, Dufour SE, Veening JW, Arrebola E, Cazorla FM, Kuipers OP, Paquot M, Pérez-García A (2007) The iturin and fengycin families of lipopeptides are key factors in antagonism of Bacillus subtilis toward Podosphaera fusca. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20:430–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosas SB, Andrés JA, Rovera M, Correa NS (2006) Phosphate-solubilizing Pseudomonas putida can influence the rhizobia–legume symbiosis. Soil Biol Biochem 38:3502–3505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan AD, Kinkel LL (1997) Inoculum density and population dynamic of suppressive and pathogenic Streptomyces strains and their relationships to biological control of potato scab. Biol Control 10:180–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchis V, Bourguet D (2008) Bacillus thuringiensis: Applications in agriculture and insect resistance management: A review. Agron Sustain Dev 28:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer K, Camper AK (2001) Characterization of phenotypic changes in Pseudomonas putida in response to surface associated growth. J Bacteriol 183:6579–6589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena A, Shende R, Grover M (2006) Interactions among beneficial microorganisms. In: Mukerji KG, Manoharachary C, Singh J (eds) Microbial activity in the rhizosphere, vol 7, Soil Biology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 121–132

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schippers B, Bakker AW, Bakker PAHM (1987) Interactions of deleterious and beneficial microorganisms and the effect of cropping practices. Annu Rev Phytopathol 25:339–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shennan C (2008) Biotic interactions, ecological knowledge and agriculture. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 363:717–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommers E, Vanderleyden J, Srinivasan M (2004) Rhizosphere bacterial signalling: a love parade beneath our feet. Crit Rev Microbiol 30:205–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J, Okon Y (2009) Plant growth-promoting actions of rhizobacteria. In: van Loon LC (ed) Advances in botanical research, vol 51. Academic, Burlington, pp 283–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenhoudt O, Vanderleyden J (2000) Azospirillum, a free-living nitrogen fixing bacterium closely associated with grasses: genetic, biochemical and ecological aspects. FEMS Microbiol Rev 24:487–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steinshamn H, Thuen E, Bleken MA, Brenoe UT, Ekerholt G, Yri C (2004) Utilization of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in an organic dairy farming system in Norway. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:509–522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thakore Y (2006) The biopesticide market for global agricultural use. Ind Biotechnol 2:194–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1998) The greening of the green revolution. Nature 396:211–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdale SL, Nelson WL (1975) Soil fertility and fertilizers, 3rd edn. Macmillan Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Touré Y, Ongena M, Jacques P, Guiro A, Thonart P (2004) Role of lipopeptides produced by Bacillus subtilis GA1 in the reduction of grey mould disease caused by Botrytis cinerea on apple. J Appl Microbiol 96:1151–1160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Elsas JD, Trevors JY (1997) Modern soil microbiology. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • van Loon LC, Bakker PA, Pieterse CM (1998) Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36:453–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vance CP (1998) Legume symbiotic nitrogen fixation: agronomic aspects. In: Spaink HP, Kondorosi A, Hooykaas PJJ (eds) The Rhizobiaceae. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 509–530

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vessey JK (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255:571–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vidhyasekaran P, Rabindran R, Muthamilan M, Nayar K, Rajappan K, Subramanian N, Vasumathi K (1997) Development of a powder formulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens for control of rice blast. Plant Soil 46:291–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman DG (1997) Technical report: human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl 7:737–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei G, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S (1991) Induction of systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum orbiculare by selected strains of plant growth-promotig rhizobacteria. Phytopathology 81:1508–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller D (1988) Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 26:379–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller DM (2007) Pseudomonas biocontrol agents of soilborne pathogens: looking back over 30 years. Phytopathology 97:250–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whipps JM (1990) Carbon economy. In: Lynch JM (ed) The rhizosphere. Wiley, Chichester, pp 59–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipps JM (2001) Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere. J Exp Bot 52:487–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson M, Lindow SE, Hirano SS (1991) The proportion of different phyllosphere bacteria in sites on or within bean leaves protected from surface sterilization. Phytopathology 81:1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Kloepper JW, Ryu CM (2009) Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress. Trends Plant Sci 14:1–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu GY, Dobbelaere S, Vanderleyden J (2002) Use of green fluorescent protein to visualized rice root colonization by Azospirillum irakense and A. brasilense. Funct Plant Biol 29:1279–1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica de la Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto (SECyT-UNRC) and CONICET PIP 112-200801-00537. NP is fellow from CONICET. MSD is a member of the research career of CONICET, Argentina. The authors thank Dr. Yaacov Okon for suggestions on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta S. Dardanelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dardanelli, M.S. et al. (2010). Benefits of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and Rhizobia in Agriculture. In: Maheshwari, D. (eds) Plant Growth and Health Promoting Bacteria. Microbiology Monographs, vol 18. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13612-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics