Advertisement

A UML 2.0 Profile to Model Block Cipher Algorithms

  • Tomás Balderas-Contreras
  • Gustavo Rodriguez-Gomez
  • René Cumplido
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6138)

Abstract

Current mobile digital communication systems must implement rigorous operations to guarantee high levels of confidentiality and integrity during transmission of critical information. To achieve higher performance, the security algorithms are usually implemented as dedicated hardware functional units attached to the main processing units of the embedded communication system. To save hardware resources, the designer usually performs a number of manipulations in the cipher algorithm lying at the core of the confidentiality and integrity operations to implement a simplified version of it that is suitable to be efficiently used in an embedded environment. This paper describes an extension to UML 2.0 to model the structure of contemporary block cipher algorithms, with the ultimate goal of synthesizing representations in a hardware description language from these models according to a model-driven development principle. This automated process should alleviate design complexity and increase the productivity of the developer during experimentation with different design alternatives.

Keywords

Block cipher algorithm UML 2.0 profile 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    3rd Generation Partnership Program: Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), Specification of the 3GPP confidentiality and integrity algorithms, Document 2: Kasumi specification (3GPP TS 35.202 version 7.0.0 Release 7) (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bailey, B., Martin, G., Piziali, A.: ESL Design and Verification. In: A Prescription for Electronic System-Level Methodology, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Björklund, D., Lilius, J.: From UML Behavioral Descriptions to Efficient Synthesizable VHDL. In: 20th IEEE Norchip Conference. IEEE, Copenhagen (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balderas-Contreras, T., Cumplido, R.: An Efficient FPGA Architecture for Block Ciphering in Third Generation Cellular Network. In: Technical Conference of The International Embedded Solutions Event, Santa Clara, California (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Balderas-Contreras, T., Cumplido, R.: High Performance Encryption Cores for 3G Networks. In: 42nd Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference, pp. 240–243. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flynn, M.J., Hung, P.: Microprocessor Design Issues: Thoughts on the Road Ahead. IEEE Micro 25(3), 16–31 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kent, S.: Model Driven Engineering. In: Butler, M., Petre, L., Sere, K. (eds.) IFM 2002. LNCS, vol. 2335, pp. 286–298. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Object Management Group: OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML) Superstructure V2.1.2. OMG Document Number: formal/2007-11-02 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Picek, R., Strahonja, V.: Model Driven Development - Future or Failure of Software Development? In: Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems, Croatia (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Riccobene, E., Scandura, P., Rosti, A., Bocchio, S.: A UML 2.0 Profile for SystemC. Technical report, ST Microelectronics (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Semiconductor Industry Association: International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors. Design Chapter (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomás Balderas-Contreras
    • 1
  • Gustavo Rodriguez-Gomez
    • 1
  • René Cumplido
    • 1
  1. 1.Optics and Electronics, Computer Science DepartmentNational Institute of AstrophysicsSanta María TonantzintlaMexico

Personalised recommendations