Skip to main content

Abstract

Cutting plane methods are widely used for solving convex optimization problems and are of fundamental importance, e.g., to provide tight bounds for Mixed-Integer Programs (MIPs). This is obtained by embedding a cut-separation module within a search scheme. The importance of a sound search scheme is well known in the Constraint Programming (CP) community. Unfortunately, the “standard” search scheme typically used for MIP problems, known as the Kelley method, is often quite unsatisfactory because of saturation issues.

In this paper we address the so-called Lift-and-Project closure for 0-1 MIPs associated with all disjunctive cuts generated from a given set of elementary disjunction. We focus on the search scheme embedding the generated cuts. In particular, we analyze a general meta-scheme for cutting plane algorithms, called in-out search, that was recently proposed by Ben-Ameur and Neto [1]. Computational results on test instances from the literature are presented, showing that using a more clever meta-scheme on top of a black-box cut generator may lead to a significant improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ben-Ameur, W., Neto, J.: Acceleration of cutting-plane and column generation algorithms: Applications to network design. Networks 49(1), 3–17 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Cornuéjols, G.: Valid inequalities for mixed integer linear programs. Mathematical Programming 112(1), 3–44 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Cornuéjols, G., Lemaréchal, C.: A convex analysis perspective on disjunctive cuts. Mathematical Programming 106(3), 567–586 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Naoum-Sawaya, J., Elhedhli, S.: An interior-point branch-and-cut algorithm for mixed integer programs. Technical report, Department of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kelley, J.E.: The cutting plane method for solving convex programs. Journal of the SIAM 8, 703–712 (1960)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Elzinga, J., Moore, T.J.: A central cutting plane algorithm for the convex programming problem. Mathematical Programming 8, 134–145 (1975)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Ye, Y.: Interior Point Algorithms: Theory and Analysis. John Wiley, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Tarasov, S., Khachiyan, L., Erlikh, I.: The method of inscribed ellipsoids. Soviet Mathematics Doklady 37, 226–230 (1988)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bland, R.G., Goldfarb, D., Todd, M.J.: The ellipsoid method: a survey. Operations Research 29(6), 1039–1091 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Atkinson, D.S., Vaidya, P.M.: A cutting plane algorithm for convex programming that uses analytic centers. Mathematical Programming 69, 1–43 (1995)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Nesterov, Y.: Cutting plane algorithms from analytic centers: efficiency estimates. Mathematical Programming 69(1), 149–176 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Goffin, J.L., Vial, J.P.: On the computation of weighted analytic centers and dual ellipsoids with the projective algorithm. Mathematical Programming 60, 81–92 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: Localization and cutting-plane methods (2007), http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee364b/notes/localization_methods_notes.pdf

  14. Balas, E.: Disjunctive programming. Annals of Discrete Mathematics 5, 3–51 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Bixby, R.E., Ceria, S., McZeal, C.M., Savelsbergh, M.W.P.: An updated mixed integer programming library: MIPLIB 3.0. Optima 58, 12–15 (1998), http://www.caam.rice.edu/bixby/miplib/miplib.html

    Google Scholar 

  16. Achterberg, T., Koch, T., Martin, A.: MIPLIB 2003. Operations Research Letters 34(4), 1–12 (2006), http://miplib.zib.de

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Beasley, J.: OR-Library: distributing test problems by electronic mail. Journal of the Operational Research Society 41(11), 1069–1072 (1990), http://people.brunel.ac.uk/~mastjjb/jeb/info.html

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fischetti, M., Salvagnin, D. (2010). An In-Out Approach to Disjunctive Optimization. In: Lodi, A., Milano, M., Toth, P. (eds) Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems. CPAIOR 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6140. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13520-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13520-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13519-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13520-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics