Concept Extraction Applied to the Task of Expert Finding

  • Georgeta Bordea
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6089)


The Semantic Web uses formal ontologies as a key instrument in order to add structure to the data, but building domain specific ontologies is still a difficult, time consuming and error-prone process since most information is currently available as free-text. Therefore the development of fast and cheap solutions for ontology learning from text is a key factor for the success and large scale adoption of the Semantic Web. Ontology development is primarily concerned with the definition of concepts and relations between them, so one of the fundamental research problems related to ontology learning is the extraction of concepts from text. To investigate this research problem we focus on the expert finding problem, i.e, the extraction of expertise topics and their assignment to individuals. The ontological concepts we extract are a person’s skills, knowledge, behaviours, and capabilities.

For increased efficiency, competitiveness and innovation, every company has to facilitate the identification of experts among its workforce. Even though this can be achieved by using the information gathered during the employment process and through self-assessment, a person’s competencies are likely to change over time. Information about people’s expertise is contained in documents available inside an organisation such as technical reports but also in publicly available resources, e.g., research articles, wiki pages, blogs, other user-generated content. The human effort required for competency management can be reduced by automatically identifying the experts and expertise topics from text. Our goal is to explore how existing technologies for concept extraction can be advanced and specialised for extracting expertise topics from text in order to build expertise profiles.


  1. 1.
    Draganidis, F., Metzas, G.: Competency based management: A review of systems and approaches. Information Management and Computer Security 14(1), 51–64 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Macdonald, C., Ounis, I.: Voting for candidates: adapting data fusion techniques for an expert search task. In: CIKM 2006: Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 387–396. ACM, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Serdyukov, P., Rode, H., Hiemstra, D.: Exploiting sequential dependencies for expert finding. In: SIGIR 2008: Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 795–796. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Craswell, N., Hawking, D., Vercoustre, A.M., Wilkins, P.: P@noptic expert: Searching for experts not just for documents. In: Ausweb, pp. 21–25 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sure, Y., Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Leveraging corporate skill knowledge – from proper to ontoproper. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management, pp. 30–31 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kunzmann, C., Schmidt, A.: Ontology-based competence management for healthcare training planning: A case study. In: 6th International Conference on Knowledge Management, IKNOW 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Colucci, S., Noia, T.D., Sciascio, E.D., Donini, F.M., Piscitelli, G., Coppi, S.: Knowledge based approach to semantic composition of teams in an organization. In: SAC 2005: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1314–1319. ACM, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Posea, V., Harzallah, M.: Building a competence ontology. In: Proceedings of the Workshop Enterprise Modelling and Ontology of the International Conference on Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management, PAKM 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhu, J., Goncalves, A.L., Uren, V.S., Motta, E., Pacheco, R.: Mining web data for competency management. In: Proceedings of Web Intelligence WI 2005, pp. 94–100. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buitelaar, P., Eigner, T.: Topic extraction from scientific literature for competency management. In: Proceedings of the Workshop Personal Identification and Collaborations: Knowledge Mediation and Extraction of the International Semantic Web Conference (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cimiano, P., Pivk, A., Schmidt-Thieme, L., Staab, S.: Learning taxonomic relations from heterogeneous sources of evidence. In: Ontology Learning from Text: Methods, Evaluation and Applications (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hearst, M.: Automatic Acquisition of Hyponyms from Large Text Corpora. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 539–545 (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Becerra-Fernandez, I.: Facilitating the online search of experts at nasa using expert seeker people-finder. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paquette, G.: An ontology and a software framework for competency modeling and management competency. Educational Technology & Society 10, 1–21 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georgeta Bordea
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit for Natural Language Processing, Digital Enterprise Research InstituteNational University of IrelandGalway

Personalised recommendations