Rapid Prototyping a Semantic Web Application for Cultural Heritage: The Case of MANTIC

  • Glauco Mantegari
  • Matteo Palmonari
  • Giuseppe Vizzari
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6089)


MANTIC is a Web application that integrates heterogenous and legacy data about the archeology of Milan (Italy); the application combines semantic Web and mashup technologies. Semantic Web models and technologies supports model-driven and standard-compliant data integration on the Web; the mashup approach supports a spatial and temporal aware form of information presentation. MANTIC shows that model-driven information integration applications for cultural heritage can be fast prototyped with limited deployment effort by combining semantic and mashup technologies. Instead, higher-level modeling aspects need a deep analysis and require domain expertise.


Cultural Heritage Rapid Prototype Triple Store Coreference Link Historical Period Reference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Yu, J., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Daniel, F.: Understanding Mashup Development. IEEE Internet Computing 12(5), 44–52 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goerz, G., Schiemann, B., Oischinger, M.: An Implementation of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (4.2.4) in OWL-DL. In: CIDOC Annual Conference, September 15-18 (2008),
  3. 3.
    Nussbaumer, P., Haslhofer, B.: CIDOC CRM in Action – Experiences and Challenges. In: Kovács, L., Fuhr, N., Meghini, C. (eds.) ECDL 2007. LNCS, vol. 4675, pp. 532–533. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Addis, M.J., Hafeez, S., Prideaux, D., Lowe, R., Lewis, P.H., Martinez, K., Sinclair, P.A.S.: The echase system for cross-border use of european multimedia cultural heritage content in education and publishing. In: AXMEDIS 2006: 2nd International Conference on Automated Production of Cross Media Content for Multi-channel Distribution (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hyvönen, E., Mäkelä, E., Kauppinen, T., Alm, O., Kurki, J., Ruotsalo, T., Seppälä, K., Takala, J., Puputti, K., Kuittinen, H., Viljanen, K., Tuominen, J., Palonen, T., Frosterus, M., Sinkkilä, R., Paakkarinen, P., Laitio, J., Nyberg, K.: CultureSampo: A National Publication System of Cultural Heritage on the Semantic Web 2.0. In: Aroyo, L., et al. (eds.) ESWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5554, pp. 851–856. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Gendt, M., Isaac, A., van der Meij, L., Schlobach, S.: Semantic web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections: A case study. In: Gonzalo, J., Thanos, C., Verdejo, M.F., Carrasco, R.C. (eds.) ECDL 2006. LNCS, vol. 4172, pp. 426–437. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doerr, M., Schaller, K., Theodoridou, M.: Integration of complementary archaeological sources. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Conference (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Binding, C., May, K., Tudhope, D.: Semantic Interoperability in Archaeological Datasets: Data Mapping and Extraction Via the CIDOC-CRM. In: Christensen-Dalsgaard, B., Castelli, D., Ammitzbøll Jurik, B., Lippincott, J. (eds.) ECDL 2008. LNCS, vol. 5173, pp. 280–290. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Babeu, A., Bamman, D., Crane, G., Kummer, R., Weaver, G.: Named Entity Identification and Cyberinfrastructure. In: Kovács, L., Fuhr, N., Meghini, C. (eds.) ECDL 2007. LNCS, vol. 4675, pp. 259–270. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glauco Mantegari
    • 1
  • Matteo Palmonari
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Vizzari
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science, Systems and Communication (DISCo)University of Milan - BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations