Incorporating Interdependency of Trust Values in Existing Trust Models for Trust Dynamics

  • Mark Hoogendoorn
  • S. Waqar Jaffry
  • Jan Treur
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 321)


Many models of trust consider the trust an agent has in another agent (the trustee) as the result of experiences with that specific agent in combination with certain personality attributes. For the case of multiple trustees, there might however be dependencies between the trust levels in different trustees. In this paper, two alternatives are described to model such dependencies: (1) development of a new trust model which incorporates dependencies explicitly, and (2) an extension of existing trust models that is able to express these interdependencies using a translation mechanism from objective experiences to subjective ones. For the latter, placing the interdependencies in the experiences enables the reuse of existing trust models that typically are based upon certain experiences over time as input. Simulation runs are performed using the two approaches, showing that both are able to generate realistic patterns of interdependent trust values.


Trust modeling interdependence trust dynamics 


  1. 1.
    Bosse, T., Jonker, C.M., Meij, L., van der Sharpanskykh, A., Treur, J.: Specification and Verification of Dynamics in Agent Models. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems (in press, 2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Braynov, S., Sandholm, T.: Incentive compatible mechanism for trust revelation. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pp. 310–311 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Falcone, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Trust dynamics: How trust is influenced by direct experiences and by trust itself. In: 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2004), pp. 740–747 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoogendoorn, M., Jaffry, S.W., Treur, J.: Modeling Dynamics of Relative Trust of Competitive Information Agents. In: Klusch, M., Pechoucek, M., Polleres, A. (eds.) CIA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5180, pp. 55–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones, A.: On the concept of trust. Decision Support Systems 33(3), 225–232 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jonker, C.M., Schalken, J.J.P., Theeuwes, J., Treur, J.: Human Experiments in Trust Dynamics. In: Jensen, C., Poslad, S., Dimitrakos, T. (eds.) iTrust 2004. LNCS, vol. 2995, pp. 206–220. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: Formal Analysis of Models for the Dynamics of Trust based on Experiences. In: Garijo, F.J., Boman, M. (eds.) MAAMAW 1999. LNCS, vol. 1647, pp. 221–232. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: A temporal-interactivist perspective on the dynamics of mental states. Cognitive Systems Research 4, 137–155 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kluwer, J., Waaler, A.: Relative Trustworthiness. In: Dimitrakos, T., Martinelli, F., Ryan, P.Y.A., Schneider, S. (eds.) FAST 2005. LNCS, vol. 3866, pp. 158–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mokhtar, M.R., Wajid, U., Wang, W.: Collaborative Trust in Multi-agent System, Enabling Technologies. In: 16th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE 2007), pp. 30–34 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ramchurn, S.D., Huynh, D., Jennings, N.R.: Trust in Multi-Agent Systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 19, 1–25 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Review on Computational Trust and Reputation Models. Artificial Intelligence Review 24, 33–60 (2005)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Hoogendoorn
    • 1
  • S. Waqar Jaffry
    • 1
  • Jan Treur
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Artificial IntelligenceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations