Woody Biomass and Purpose-Grown Trees as Feedstocks for Renewable Energy

  • Maud A. W. HincheeEmail author
  • Lauren N. Mullinax
  • William H. Rottmann
Part of the Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry book series (AGRICULTURE, volume 66)


Trees and woody biomass currently provide raw materials for pulp, paper and lumber for the traditional wood products industry. The United States produces the largest amount of wood for industrial applications in the world, and the Southeastern US is an important “wood basket” with more than 365 million green short tons (2,000 pounds or 907 kg) of hardwood and pine being harvested annually. Woody biomass can provide renewable energy by direct firing or co-firing of wood for electricity generation or through the production of liquid fuels. The utilization of woody biomass for the production of electric power is already a relatively common practice, but this application is expanding. In addition, the use of lignocellulosic feedstock, such as wood, for the production of liquid fuels, is developing rapidly due to US government mandates for increased use of biofuels in the nation’s transportation fuel supply. Ethanol is the most common biofuel produced from wood, although wood can also be used to produce gasoline and diesel fuels. Many tree species already used for fiber and sawtimber applications can also be used for biopower and biofuels production. Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) is a native tree purpose-grown widely in the Southeastern US for production of pulp, paper and lumber, but it is has also been used for biopower generation. Faster growing hardwood species such as Populus, Salix, and Eucalyptus can be grown as short rotation woody crops due to their rapid growth and ability to coppice. Specific process elements of biopower and biofuel generation processes are affected by certain tree characteristics, and the suitability of different tree species for different energy production technologies are discussed. Genetic improvement and modifications in silvicultural management can improve the economics of using woody biomass for the production of biopower and bioenergy. Short rotation, purpose-grown trees, developed for high biomass productivity and improved processing capabilities, will have a variety of inherent logistical benefits and economic advantages to other plant materials. Genetic improvement of trees, through conventional breeding and biotechnology, will enhance the quality, productivity, and sustainability of purpose-grown trees, enabling them to meet the renewable resource needs of multiple industrial applications, including bioenergy.


Energy Crop Steam Explosion Hybrid Poplar Short Rotation Short Rotation Coppicing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abt RC, Cubbage FW, Galik C, Henderson JD (2010) Effect of policy-based bioenergy demand on southern timber markets: a case study in North Carolina. Biomass Bioenergy (in press)Google Scholar
  2. Adams DM, Haynes RW, Daigneault AJ (2006) Estimated timber harvest by US region and ownership, 1950-2002. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-659, January 2006. Google Scholar
  3. ACORE (2009) Overview of Renewable Energy Provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. American Council on Renewable Energy,
  4. AFPA (2009) Alternative fuel mixture tax credit. 17 June 17 2009, American Forest and Paper Association, Cited 2 January 2010Google Scholar
  5. Andersson G, Asikainen A, Bjorheden R, Hall PW, Hudson JB, Jirjis R, Mead DJ, Nurmi J, Weetman GF (2002) Production of forest energy. In: Richardson J, Bjorheden R, Hakkila P, Lowe AT, Smith CT (eds) Bioenergy from sustainable forestry: guiding principles and practice. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 49–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anterola AM, Lewis NG (2002) Trends in lignin modification: a comprehensive analysis of the effects of genetic manipulations/mutations on lignification and vascular integrity. Phytochemistry 61:221–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arato C, Pye EK, Gjennestad G (2005) The lignol approach to biorefining of woody biomass to produce ethanol and chemicals. J Appl Biochem Biotechnol 123:871–882. doi:10.1385/ABAB:123:1-3:0871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Atsumi S, Hanai T, Liao JC (2007) Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels. Nature 451:86–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Austin A (2008) The road ahead for FFVs. Ethanol Producer Magazine. Retrieved 16 October 2009.
  10. Baker JB, Langdon OG (1990) Loblolly pine. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America, vol 1. Conifers. Agriculture Handbook. US Department of Agriculture. Forest Service, Washington DC 654:497–512Google Scholar
  11. Benedict C, Skinner JS, Meng R, Chang Y, Bhalerao R, Huner NP, Finn CE, Chen TH, Hurry V (2006) The CBF1-dependent low temperature signalling pathway, regulon and increase in freeze tolerance are conserved in Populus spp. Plant Cell Environ 29:1259–1272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bergman R, Zerbe J (2008) Primer on wood biomass for energy. USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry Technology Marketing Unit Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, Google Scholar
  13. Bevill K (2008) Lignol receives $2 million for cellulosic plant. Biomass Magazine, 28 July 2008,
  14. Biomass Energy Foundation (2009) Woodgas: fuel densitities., cited 23 November 2009Google Scholar
  15. Boerjan W, Ralph J, Baucher M (2003) Lignin biosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54:519–546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Böhlenius H, Huang T, Charbonnel-Campaa L, Brunner AM, Jansson S, Strauss SH, Nilsson O (2006) CO/FT regulatory module controls timing of flowering and seasonal growth cessation in trees. Science 312:1040–1043PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bridgwater AV (2003) Renewable fuels and chemicals by thermal processing of biomass. Chem Eng J 91:87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown MA, Atamturk N (2008) Potential impacts of energy and climate policies on the US pulp and paper industry. Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Public Policy Working Paper No. 40, June 2008, Google Scholar
  19. Burdon RD, Libby WJ (2006) Genetically modified forests: from Stone age to modern biotechnology. Forest History Society. Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  20. Busov BV, Meilan R, Pearce DW, Ma C, Rood SB, Strauss SH (2003) Activation tagging of a dominant gibberellin catabolism gene (GA-2 oxidase) from poplar that regulates tree stature. Plant Physiol 132:1283–1291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Busov BV, Brunner AM, Strauss SH (2008) Genes for control of plant stature and form. New Phytol 177:589–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Center of Innovation in Agribusiness (2009) Alternative Fuel Technology Company Locates in Georgia, 10 July 2006, Google Scholar
  23. Ceulemans R, Stettler RF, Hinckley TM, Isebrands JG, Heilman PE (1990) Crown architecture of Populus clones as determined by branch orientation and branch characteristics. Tree Physiol 7:157–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen F, Dixon RA (2007) Lignin modification improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. Nat Biotechnol 25:759–761, doi:10.1038/nbt1316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chiang VL, Funaoka M (1990) The difference between guaiacyl and guaiacyl-syringyl lignins in their responses to Kraft delignification. Holzforschung 44:309–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chichkova S, Arellano J, Vance CP, Hernandex G (2001) Transgenic tobacco plants that overexpress alfalfa NADH-glutamate synthase have higher carbon and nitrogen content. J Exp Bot 52:2079–2084PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Coleman HD, Samuels AL, Guy RD, Mansfield SD (2008) Perturbed lignification impacts tree growth in hybrid poplar—a function of sink strength, vascular integrity, and photosynthetic assimilation. Plant Physiol 148:1229–1237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cunningham MW, Hinchee MA, Mullinax LN (2010) Freeze tolerant Eucalyptus: a biotech solution for purpose grown hardwoods. In: Proceedings of the Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, 2 June 2009, Blacksburg, VA (in press)Google Scholar
  29. Davis AA, Trettin CC (2006) Sycamore and sweetgum plantation productivity on former agricultural land in South Carolina. Biomass Bioenergy 30:769–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Davis JM (2008) Genetic improvement of Poplar (Populus spp.) as a bioenergy crop. In: Vermerris W (ed) Genetic improvement of bioenergy crops. Springer, New York, pp 397–419, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70805-8_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. DeBell DS, Clendenen GW, Harrington CA, Zasada JC (1996) Tree growth and stand development in short-rotation Populus plantings: 7-year results for two clones at three spacings. Biomass Bioenergy 11:253–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. De la Torre Ugarte DG, Walsh ME, Shapouri H, Slinsky SP (2003) The economic impacts of bioenergy crop production on US agriculture. Agricultural Economics Report No. 816, Washington DC, US Department of Agriculture, Office of the Chief Economist, Office of Energy Policy and New Uses, Google Scholar
  33. Dickmann DL (2006) Silviculture and biology of short rotation woody crops in temperate regions: then and now. Biomass Bioenergy 30:696–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Doran-Peterson J, Cook DM, Brandon SK (2008) Microbial conversion of sugars from plant biomass to lactic acid or ethanol. Plant J 54:582–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Donahue RA, Davis TD, Michler CH, Riemenschneider DE, Carter DR, Marquardt PE, Sankhla N, Hassig BE, Isebrands JG (1994) Growth, photosynthesis, and herbicide tolerance of genetically modified hybrid poplar. Can J For Res 24:2377–2383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dubouzet JG, Sakuma Y, Ito Y, Kasuga M, Dubouzet EG, Miura S, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2003) OsDREB genes in rice, Oryza sativa L., encode transcription activators that function in drought-, high-salt- and cold-responsive gene expression. Plant J 33:751–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Duguay J, Sadaf J, Liua Z, Wanga T-W, Thompson JE (2007) Leaf-specific suppression of deoxyhypusine synthase inArabidopsis thaliana enhances growth without negative pleiotropic effects. J Plant Physiol 164:408–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Eggeman T (2009) Third-generation cellulosic biofuels: sustainable, efficient, cost-effective. AiCHE 2009 Annual Conference,
  39. Eldridge KG, Harwood C, van Wyk G, Davidson J (1994) Eucalypt domestication and breeding. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  40. El-Khatib R, Hamerlynck EP, Gallardo F, Kirby EG (2004) Transgenic poplar characterized by ectopic expression of a pine cytosolic glutamine synthetase gene exhibits enhanced tolerance to water stress. Tree Physiol 24:729–736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Energy Information Administration (2008) Renewable energy consumption and electricity. Preliminary 2007 statistics. United States Department of Energy, Washington, DC. Retrieved 16 November 2009 Google Scholar
  42. English BC, De La Torre Ugarte DG, Jensen K, Helwinckel C, Menard J, Wilson B, Roberts R, Walsh M (2006) 25% Renewable Energy for the United States by 2025: agricultural and economic impacts. The University of Tennessee, Institute of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, Biobased Energy Analysis Group, retrieved 26 October 2009Google Scholar
  43. European Union (2002) European Union ratifies the Kyoto Protocol. Press release, 31 May 2002, Google Scholar
  44. Ewald D, Hu J, Yang M (2006) Transgenic forest trees in China. In: Fladung M, Ewald D (eds) Tree transgenesis recent developments. Springer, Berlin, pp 25–45 doi: 10.1007/3-540-32199-3_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fan LT, Le Y-H, Gharpuray MM (1982) The nature of lignocellulosics and their pretreatments for enzymatic hydrolysis. In: Fiechter A (ed) Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, vol. 23. Microbial reactions. pp 157–187, doi: 10.1007/3-540-11698-2Google Scholar
  46. FAO (2000) Global forest resources assessment 2000—main report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forestry paper, http://
  47. Forisk Consulting (2009) Wood biomass south report.
  48. Foster CD, Mayfield C (2007) Bioenergy production in planted pine forests. In: Hubbard W, Biles L, Mayfield C, Ashton S (eds) Sustainable forestry for bioenergy and bio-based products: trainers curriculum notebook. Southern Forest Research Partnership, Athens, GA, pp 117–120Google Scholar
  49. Fox TR, Allen HL, Albaugh TJ, Rubilar R, Carlson CA (2006) Forest fertilization in southern pine plantations. Better Crops 90:12–15Google Scholar
  50. Frederick WJ Jr, Lien SJ, Courchene CE, DeMartini NA, Ragauskas AJ, Lisa K (2008) Production of ethanol from carbohydrates from loblolly pine: a technical an economic assessment. Bioresour Technol 99:5051–5057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Fu J, Sampalo R, Gallardo F, Canavos FM, Kirby EG (2003) Assembly of a cytosolic pine glutamine synthetase holoenzyme in leaves of transgenic poplar leads to enhanced vegetative growth in young plants. Plant Cell Environ 26:411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gaddy James L (2000) Biological production of ethanol from waste gases. US Patent number: 6 136-577, Filing date: 1 July 1996, Issue date: 24 October 2000Google Scholar
  53. Gallagher T, Shaffer B, Rummer B (2006) An economic analysis of hardwood fiber production on dryland irrigated sites in the US Southeast. Biomass Bioenergy 30:794–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gaur S, Reed TB (1998) Thermal data for natural and synthetic fuels. 1998. Dekker, NYGoogle Scholar
  55. Gevo (2009) Gevo wins US grant for bimass to butanol development. Press release, Google Scholar
  56. Goicoechea M, Lacombe E, Legay S, Mihaljevic S, Rech P, Jauneau A, Lapierre C, Pollet B, Verhaegen D, Chaubet-Gigot N, Grima-Pettenati J (2005) EgMYB2, a new transcriptional activator from Eucalytpus xylem, regulates secondary cell wall formation and lignin biosynthesis. Plant J 43:553–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Gomez Jimenez MD, Canas Clemente LA, Madueno Albi F, Beltran Porter JP (2006) Sequence regulating the anther-specific expression of a gene and its use in the production of androsterile plants and hybrid seeds. US Patent no. 7078593Google Scholar
  58. Good AG, Swarat AK, Muench DG (2004) Can less yield more? Is reducing nutrient input into the environment compatible with maintaining crop production? Trends Plant Sci 9:597–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Grabber JH, Ralph J, Hatfield RD, Quideau S (1997) p-Hydroxyphenyl, guaiacyl, and syringyl lignins have similar inhibitory effects on cell wall degradation. J Agric Food Chem 45:2530–2532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Grattapaglia D (2004) Integrating genomics into Eucalyptus breeding. Genet Mol Res 3:369–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Grattapaglia D, Ribeiro D, Rezende VJ, Rezende GDSP (2004) Retrospective selection of elite parent trees using paternity testing with microsatellite markers: an alternative short term breeding tactic for Eucalyptus. Theor Appl Genet 109:192–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Green Car Congress (2009) BioEthanol Japan begins production of cellulosic ethanol from wood scraps; uses Celunol Technology, 16 January 2007,, cited 1 December 2009
  63. Gresham CA (2002) Sustainability of intensive loblolly pine plantation management in Carolina coastal plain, USA. For Ecol Manag 155:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Grossnickle SC, Pait J (2008) Somatic embryogenesis tissue culture for applying varietal forestry to conifer species. USDA Forest Service Proceedings, RMRS-P-57:135–139, Google Scholar
  65. Grous WR, Converse AO, Grethlein HE (1986) Effect of steam explosion pretreatment on pore size and enzymatic hydrolysis of poplar. Enzyme Microb Technol 8:274–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hamelinck CN, van Hooijdonk G, Faaij APC (2005) Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long-term. Biomass Bioenergy 28:384–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hansen E, Netzer D, Reitveld WJ (1984) Weed control for establishing extensively managed hybrid poplar plantations, US Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, Research Note NC-317Google Scholar
  68. Heller MC, Keoleian GA, Volk TA (2003) Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system. Biomass Bioenergy 25:147–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Herve C, Ceulemans R (1996) Short-rotation coppiced vs non-coppiced poplar: a comparative study at two different field sites. Biomass Bioenergy11:139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hinchee M, Rottmann W, Mullinax L, Zhang C, Chang S, Cunningham M, Pearson L, Nehra N (2009) Short-rotation woody crops for bioenergy and biofuels applications. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 45:619–629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hinckley TM, Brooks JR, Cermak J, Ceulemans R, Kucera J, Meinzer FC, Roberts DA (1994) Water flux in a hybrid poplar stand. Tree Physiol 14:1005–1018PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hislop D, Hall DO (1996) Biomass resources for gasificiation power plant. A report for the IEA Bio-Energy Agreement, Thermal Gasfification Activity Task 33, London, IEA 28 ETSU B/M3/00388/31/REP, April 1995. Google Scholar
  73. Howard J (2005) Estimation of US timber harvest using roundwood equivalents. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Forest Inventory and Analysis Symposium, 21–24 September 2004, Denver, CO. General Technical Report WO-70. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Washington DC, Google Scholar
  74. Hsieh TH, Lee JT, Yang PT, Chiu LH, Charng YY, Wang YC, Chan MT (2002) Heterologous expression of the Arabidopsis C-repeat/dehydration response element binding factor 1 gene confers elevated tolerance to chilling and oxidative stresses in transgenic tomato. Plant Physiol 129:1086–1094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Hu JJ, Tian YC, Han YF, Li L, Zhang BE (2001) Field evaluation of insect resistant transgenic Populus nigra trees. Euphytica 121:123–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Hu WJ, Harding SA, Lung J, Popko JL, Ralph J, Stokke DD, Tsai CJ, Chiang VL (1999) Repression of lignin biosynthesis promotes cellulose accumulation and growth in transgenic trees. Nat Biotechnol 17:808–812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Huntley SK, Ellis D, Gilbert M, Chapple C, Mansfield SD (2003) Significant increases in pulping efficiency in C4H-F5H-transformed poplars: improved chemical savings and reduced environmental toxins. J Agric Food Chem 51:6178–6183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. IEA BioEnergy (2002) Sustainable production of woody biomass for energy. IEA BioEnergy Position Paper. Google Scholar
  79. ISAAA (2008) The global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2008. Retrieved 20 October 2009. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications,
  80. Ito Y, Katsura K, Maruyama K, Taji T, Kobayashi M, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2006) Functional analysis of rice DREB1/CBF-type transcription factors involved in cold-responsive gene expression in transgenic rice. Plant Cell Physiol 47:141–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Jaglo-Ottosen KR, Gilmour SJ, Zarka DG, Schabenberger O, Thomashow MF (1998) Arabidopsis CBF1 overexpression induces COR genes and enhances freezing tolerance. Science 280:104–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Jaglo-Ottosen KR, Kleff S, Amundsen KL, Zhang X, Haake V, Zhang JZ, Deits T, Thomashow MF (2001) Components of the Arabidopsis C-repeat/dehydration-responsive element binding factor cold-response pathway are conserved in Brassica napus and other plant species. Plant Physiol 127:910–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Jahromi ST (1982) Variation in cold resistance and growth in Eucalyptus viminalis. South J Appl For 6:221–225Google Scholar
  84. James RR, Meilan R, Skinner JS, Han K-H, Jouanin L, Ma C, Pilate G, DiFaxio SP, Strauss SH, Eaton JA, Hoien EA, Stanton BJ, Crockett RP, Taylor ML (2002) The CP4 transgene provides high levels of tolerance to Roundup® herbicide in field-grown hybrid poplars. Can J For Res 32:967–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Johnson JD, Tognetti R, Paris P (2002) Water relations and gas exchange in poplar and willow under water stress and elevated atmospheric CO2. Physiol Planta 115:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Joint Genome Institute (2009) Eucalyptus genomic sequencing progress. United States Department of Energy, Office of Science,, cited 22 December 2009Google Scholar
  87. Jorgensen H, Kristensen JB, Felby C (2007) Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 1:119–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Kalluri UC, Difazio SP, Brunner AM, Tuskan GA (2007) Genome-wide analysis of Aux/IAA and ARF gene families in Populus trichocarpa. BMC Plant Biol 7:59, doi:10.1186/1471-2229-7-59, PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Karp A, Shield I (2008) Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge. New Phytol 179:15–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Kasuga M, Liu Q, Miura S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1999) Improving plant drought, salt, and freezing tolerance by gene transfer of a single stress-inducible transcription factor. Nat Biotechnol 17:287–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Kasuga M, Miura S, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2004) A combination of the Arabidopsis DREB1A gene and stress-inducible rd29A promoter improved drought- and low-temperature stress tolerance in tobacco by gene transfer. Plant Cell Physiol 45:346-350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Kauter D, Lewandowski I, Claupein W (2003) Quantity and quality of harvestable biomass from Populus short rotation coppice for solid fuel use—a review of the physiological basis and management influences. Biomass Bioenergy 24:411–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Kavalov B, Peteves SD (2005) Status and perspectives of biomass to liquid fuels in the European Union. European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Center, Institute for Energy, Petten, The Netherlands. EUR21745. Google Scholar
  94. Kiplinger Washington (ed) (2007) Kiplinger’s biofuels market report vol 1,
  95. KL Process Design Group (2008) The 2nd generation cellulosic ethanol leader, becomes public and changes it’s name to KL Energy Corp., October 2008,
  96. Kral R (1993) Pinus. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds) 1993+. Flora of North America North of Mexico. 15+ vols. New York and Oxford. Vol 3, pp 356–357Google Scholar
  97. Kumar A, Flynn P, Sokhansanj S (2008) Biopower generation from mountain pine infested wood in Canada: an economical opportunity for greenhouse gas mitigation. Renew Energy 33:1354–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P (2009) Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res 48: 3713–3729Google Scholar
  99. Kuzovkina YA, Weih M, Romero MA, Charles J, Hurst S, McIvor I, Karp A, Trybush S, Labrecque M, Teodorescu TI, Singh NB, Smart LB, Volk TA (2008) Salix: botany and global horticulture. Hortic Rev 34:447–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Lane J (2009) BP, DuPont butanol JV, Butamax, heads for commercialization; BP stands for “butanol play”? How will Gevo, Cobalt counter? Biofuels Digest, 14 July 2009. Retrieved 6 November 2009
  101. Lapierre C, Pollet B, Petit-Conil M, Toval G, Romero J, Pilate G, Leplé J-C, Boerjan W, Ferret V, De Nadai V, Jouanin L (1999) Structural alterations of lignins in transgenic poplars with depressed cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase or caffeic acid O-methyltransferase activity have an opposite impact on the efficiency of industrial kraft pulping. Plant Physiol 119:153–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Leplé JC, Dauwe R, Morreel K, Storme V, Lapierre C, Pollet B, Naumann A, Kang KY, Kim H, Ruel K, Lefèbvre A, Joseleau JP, Grima-Pettenati J, De Rycke R, Andersson-Gunnerås S, Erban A, Fehrle I, Petit-Conil M, Kopka J, Polle A, Messens E, Sundberg B, Mansfield SD, Ralph J, Pilate G, Boerjan W (2007) Downregulation of cinnamoyl-coenzyme A reductase in poplar: multiple-level phenotyping reveals effects on cell wall polymer metabolism and structure. Plant Cell 19:3669–3691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Li X, Weng JK, Chapple C (2008) Improvement of biomass through lignin modification. Plant J. 54:569–581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Liang ZS, Yang HW, Shao HB, Han RL (2006) Investigation on water consumption characteristics and water use efficiency of poplar under soil water deficits on the loess plateau. Colloids Surf B 53 23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Linderson ML, Iritz Z, Lindroth A (2007) The effect of water availability on stand-level productivity, transpiration, water use efficiency and radiation use efficiency of field-grown willow clones. Biomass Bioenergy 31:460–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Liu Q, Kasuga M, Sakuma Y, Abe H, Miura S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1998) Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought- and low-temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 10:1391–1406PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Man Hui-min R, Boriel R, El-Khatib Kirby EG (2005) Characterization of transgenic poplar with ectopic expression of pine cyotsolic glutamine synthetase under conditions of varying nitrogen availability. New Phytol 167:31–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Mann L, Tolbert V (2000) Soil sustainability in renewable biomass plantations. Ambio 29:492–498Google Scholar
  109. McCown BH, McCabe DE, Russell DR, Robison DJ, Barton KA, Raffa KF (1991) Stable transformation of Populus and incorporation of pest resistance by electric discharge particle acceleration. Plant Cell Rep 9:590–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. McKendry P (2002) Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol 83:37–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. McNabb K, Enebak S (2008) Forest tree seedling production in the Southern United States: the 2005–2006 planting season. Tree Planters Notes 53:47–56 Google Scholar
  112. Mead DJ (2005) Forests for energy and the role of planted trees. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:407–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Meilan R, Ma C, Cheng S, Eaton J, Miller LK, Crockett RP, DiFazio SP, Strauss SH (2000) High levels of Roundup® and leaf-beetle resistance in genetically engineered hybrid cottonwoods. In: Blatner KA, Johnson JD, Baumgartner DM (eds) Hybrid poplars in the Pacific Northwest: culture, commerce and capability. Washington State University Cooperative Extension Bulletin MISC0272, Pullman, WA, pp 29–38Google Scholar
  114. Mercker D (2007) Short rotation woody crops for biofuels. University of Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station. Retrieved 3 November 2009. Google Scholar
  115. Meskimen G, Francis JK (1990) Rose gum Eucalyptus. In: Burns RM, BH Honkala (eds) Silvics of North America, vol 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, Google Scholar
  116. Meskimen GF, Rockwood DL, Reddy KV (1987) Development of Eucalyptus clones for a summer rainfall environment with periodic severe frosts. New For 1:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Mitsuda N, Iwase A, Yamamoto H, Yoshida M, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Ohme-Takagi M (2007) NAC transcription factors, NST1 and NST3, are key regulators of the formation of secondary walls in woody tissues of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19:270–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Mora AL, Garcia CH (2000) Eucalypt cultivation in Brazil. Brazilian Society of Silviculture (SBS), Sao Paulo, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  119. Murray B, Nicholson R, Ross M, Holloway T, Patil S (2006) Biomass energy consumption in the forest products industry. RTI Project Number 0209217.002, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, Scholar
  120. Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB, Thorsness MK (1999) Isolated DNA elements that direct pistil-specific and anther-specific gene expression and methods of using same. United States Patent No. 5,859,328Google Scholar
  121. Nathan R, Katul GG, Horn HS, Thomas SM, Oren R, Avissar R, Pacala SW, Levin SA (2002) Mechanisms of long-distance dispersal of seeds by wind. Nature 418:409–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Nehra NS, Becwar MR, Rottmann WH, Pearson L, Chowdhury K, Chang S, Wilde HD, Kodrzycki RJ, Zhang C, Gause KC, Parks DW, Hinchee MA (2005) Forest biotechnology: innovative methods, emerging opportunities. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 41:701–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. National Renewable Energy Laboraory (1999) A renewable alternative for utlities and their customers. US Department of Energy, Biomass Power, Washington DC, DOE/GO-200099-759, May 1999, Google Scholar
  124. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2009) ORNL/BFDP Poplar Drought Tolerance Research,; accessed 10 January 2009Google Scholar
  125. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B (2000) Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: Inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour Technol 74:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Pan X, Arato C, Gilkes N, Gregg, Mabee W, Pye K, Xiao Z, Zhang X, Saddler J (2005) Biorefining of softwoods using ethanol organosolv pulping: preliminary evaluation of process streams for manufacture of fuel-grade ethanol and co-products. Biotechnol Bioeng 90:473–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Patzlaff A, McInnis S, Courtenay A, Surman C, Newman LJ, Smith C, Bevan MW, Mansfield S, Whetten RW, Sederoff RR, Campbell MM (2003) Characterisation of a pine MYB that regulates lignification. Plant J 46:743–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Perlack RD, Wright LL Turhollow AF, Graham RL, Stokes BJ, Erbach DC (2005) Biomass as a feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TNCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Pew Center on Global Climate Change (2008) Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS), cited August 19, 2008Google Scholar
  130. Polle A, Altman A, Jiang X (2006) Towards genetic engineering for drought tolerance in trees. In: Fladung M, Ewald D (eds) Tree transgenesis: recent developments. Springer, Berlin, pp 275–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. PR NewsWire (2009) Cellulosic ethanol takes off! 23 January 2009,
  132. Proe MF, Griffiths JH, Craig J (2002) Effects of spacing, species and coppicing on leaf area, light interception and photosynthesis in short rotation forestry. Biomass Bioenergy 23:315–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Qin F, Sakuma Y, Li J, Liu Q, Li YQ, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2004) Cloning and functional analysis of a novel DREB1/CBF transcription factor involved in cold-responsive gene expression in Zea mays L. Plant Cell Phys 45:1042–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CJ, Frederick WJ, Hallett JP, Leak DJ, Liotta CL, Mielenz JR, Murphy R, Templer R, Tschaplinski T (2006) The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 311:484–489, doi: 10.1126/science.1114736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Raison RJ (2002) Environmental sustainability of forest energy production. In: Richardson J, Boerjhedan J, Hakkila P, Lowe AT, Smith CT (eds) Bioenergy from sustainable forestry: guiding principles and practice. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 159–262Google Scholar
  136. Reynolds KM (2005) Integrated decision support for sustainable forest management in the United States: fact or fiction? Comput Electron Agric 49:6–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Reynolds KM, Johnson KN, Gordon SN (2003) The science/policy interface in logic-based evaluation of forest ecosystem sustainability. For Policy Econ 5:433–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Robinson TL, Rousseau RJ, Zhang J (2006) Biomass productivity improvement for eastern cottonwood. Biomass Bioenergy 30:735–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Robison DJ, McCown BH, Raffa KF (1994) Responses of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) and forest tent caterpillar (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) to transgenic poplar, Populus spp., containing a Bacillus thuringiensis gene. Environ Entomol 23:1030–1041Google Scholar
  140. Rockwood DL, Naidu CV, Carter DR, Rahmani M, Spriggs TA, Lin C, Alker GR, Isebrands JG, Segrest SA (2004) Short-rotation woody crops and phytoremediation: opportunities for agroforestry? J Agrofor Syst 61–62:51–63, doi: 10.1023/B:AGFO.0000028989.72186.e6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Rockwood DL, Rudie AW, Ralph SA, Zhu JY, Winandy JE (2008) Energy product options for Eucalyptus species grown as short rotation woody crops. Int J Mol Sci 9:1361–1378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Ronnberg-Wastljung AC, Gullberg U (1999) Genetics of breeding characters with possible effects on biomass production in Salix viminalis (L.). Theor Appl Genet98:531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Rowell RM (2005) Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites. Taylor & Francis/CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  144. Rubin EM (2008) Genomics of cellulosic biofuels. Nature 454:841–845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Sang Y, Zheng S, Li W, Huang B, Wang X (2001) Regulation of plant water loss by manipulating the expression of phospholipas Dα. Plant J 23:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Satori F, Lal R, Ebinger MH, Parrish DJ (2006) Potential soil carbon sequestration and CO2 offset by dedicated energy crops in the USA. Crit Rev Plant Sci 25:441–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Schuette B (2000) Weed management strategies for hybrid poplar plantings. In: Blatner KA, Johnson JD, Baumbartner DM (eds) Hybrid poplars in the Pacific Northwest: culture, commerce, and capability. In: Symposium Proceedings, 7–9 April 1999, Pasco, WA. Washington State University Cooperative Extension Publication MISC0272, Pullman, WA, pp 83–86Google Scholar
  148. Schuster KC (2000) Applied acetone-butanol fermentation. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 2:3–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Sedjo RA (2001) Biotechnology in forestry: considering the costs and benefits. Resoures 145:10–12, Google Scholar
  150. Shani Z, Dekel M, Tsabary G, Goren R, Shoseyov O (2004) Growth enhancement of transgenic poplar plants by over expression of Arabidopsis thaliana endo-1,4-β-glucanase (cel1). Mol Breed 14:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Short Rotation Forestry Handbook (1995) University of Aberdeen. Retrieved 20 October 2009,
  152. Sims RH, Venturi P (2004) All year-round harvesting of short rotation coppice Eucalyptus compared with the delivered costs of biomass from more conventional short season, harvesting systems. Biomass Bioenergy 26:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Sims RH, Maiava TG, Bullock BT (2001) Short rotation coppice tree species selection for woody biomass production in New Zealand. Biomass Bioenergy 20:329–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Sklar T (2009) Making the case for woody biomass based biofuels and bioenergy. Biofuels Digest, 19 February 2009,
  155. Smart LB, Volk TA, Lin J, Kopp RF, Phillips IS, Cameron KD, White EH, Abrahamson LP (2005) Genetic improvement of shrub willow (Salix spp.) crops for bioenergy and environmental applications in the United States. Unasylva 56:51–55Google Scholar
  156. SAFER (2009) Southern Bioenergy Roadmap. Southern Agriculture & Forestry Resource Alliance,
  157. Southern Alliance for Clean Energy (2009) Yes we can: Southern solutions for a national renewable energy standard, posted 23 February 2009
  158. Stanton BJ (2003) Poplars. In: Burley J, Evans J, Younquist JA (eds) Encyclopedia of forest sciences. Elsvier, Oxford, pp 1441–1449Google Scholar
  159. Stanton B, Eaton J, Johnson J, Rice D, Schuette B, Moser B (2002) Hybrid poplar in the Pacific Northwest: the effects of market-driven management. J For 100:28–33Google Scholar
  160. Stanturf J, Gardiner E, Schoenholtz S (2003) Interplanting for bioenergy and riparian restoration in the southeastern USA. In: Nicholas ID (ed) Proceedings, Short Rotation Crops for Bioenergy. International Energy Agency Task 30 Conferences 1–5 December 2003, Tauranga, New Zealand, pp 241–250Google Scholar
  161. Stricker J, Rockwood DL, Segrest SA, Alker GR, Prine RM, Carter DR (2000) Short rotation woody crops for Florida. In: Proceedings of 3rd Biennial Short Rotation Woody Crops Operations Working Group Conference, Syracuse, NY, pp 15–23, Google Scholar
  162. Tharakan PJ, Volk TA, Abrahamson LP, White EH (2003) Energy feedstock characteristics of willow and hybrid poplar clones at harvest age. Biomass Bioenergy25:571–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. TimberMart (2008) South Market News Quarterly 13:1 p 28, Retrieved 3 Nov. 2009 Google Scholar
  164. Transport Studies Group, University of Westminster (1996) Supply chain options for biomass fuels. In: Transport and supply logistics of biomass fuels, vol. 1. ETSU Report B/W2/00399/Rep/2Google Scholar
  165. Turnbull J (1999) Eucalyptus plantations. New For 17:37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Tuskan GA (1998) Short-rotation woody crop supply systems in the United States: what do we know and what do we need to know? Biomass Bioenergy 14:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Tuskan GA (2007) Bioenergy, genomics, and accelerated domestication: a US example. In: FAO, Papers and Presentations from The Role of Agricultural Biotechnologies for Production of Bioenergy in Developing Countries, Google Scholar
  168. Tuskan G, DiFazio S, Hellsten U, Jansson S, Rombauts S, Putnam N, Sterck L, Bohlmann J, Schein J, Bhalerao RR, Bhalerao RP, Blaudez D, Boerjan W, Brun A, Brunner A, Busov V, Campbell M, Carlson J, Chalot M, Chapman J, Chen G, Cooper D, Coutinho PM, Couturier J, Covert S, Cunningham R, Davis J, Degroeve S, dePamphilis C, Detter J, Dirks B, Dubchak I, Duplessis S, Ehlting J, Ellis B, Gendler K, Goodstein D, Gribskov M, Grigoriev I, Groover A, Gunter L, Hamberger B, Heinze B, Helariutta Y, Henrissat B, Holligan D, Islam-Faridi N, Jones-Rhoades M, Jorgensen R, Joshi C, Kangasjärvi J, Karlsson J, Kelleher C, Kirkpatrick R, Kirst M, Kohler A, Kalluri U, Larimer F, Leebens-Mack J, Leplé JC, Déjardin A, Pilate G, Locascio P, Lucas S, Martin F, Montanini B, Napoli C, Nelson DR, Nelson CD, Nieminen KM, Nilsson O, Peter G, Philippe R, Poliakov A, Ralph S, Richardson P, Rinaldi C, Ritland K, Rouzé P, Ryaboy D, Salamov A, Schrader J, Segerman B, Sterky F, Souza C, Tsai C, Unneberg P, Wall K, Wessler S, Yang G, Yin T, Douglas C, Sandberg G, Van de Peer Y, Rokhsar D (2006) The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa. Science 313:1596–1604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. US DOE (2007a) DOE selects six cellulosic ethanol plants for up to $385 million in Federal funding. Press release 28 February 2007. Retrieved 26 Oct. 2009.
  170. US DOE (2007b) DOE Bioenergy Research Centers, Retrieved 31 October 2009
  171. US DOE Office of Science (2009) DOE BioEnergy Science Center (BESC), accessed 10 December 2009
  172. US Department of Agriculture (2002) Agricultural Research Service Global Change National Program. Google Scholar
  173. US Department of Agriculture (2008) Agricultural Research Service Global Change National Program, Research: Plantation Tree Farming, last modified 28 October 2008
  174. US EPA (2007) Renewable Fuel Standard Program, Retrieved 23 November 2009
  175. US EPA (2008) US Climate Policy and Actions. Accessed 19 August 2008
  176. Uslu A, Faaij APC, Bergman PCA (2008) Pre-treatment technologies, and their effect on international bioenergy supply chain logistics. Techno-economic evaluation of torrefaction, fast pyrolysis and pelletisation. Energy 33:1206–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Van Frankenhuyzen K, Beardmore T (2004) Current status and environmental impact of transgenic forest trees. Can J For Res 34:1163–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Vanholme R, Morreel K, Ralph J, Boerjan W (2008) Lignin engineering. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:278–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Verenium Corporation (2009) Verenium Corporation: combining world-class enzyme science with expertise in complex, large-plant infrastructure, Verenium Corporation Fact Sheet. cited 11 November 2009
  180. Vessia Ø (2005) Biofuels from lignocellulosic material—in the Norwegian context 2010—technology, potential and costs. NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Google Scholar
  181. Vogt DJ, Vogt KA, Gordon JC, Miller ML, Mukumoto C, Upadhye R, Miller MH (2009) Wood methanol as a renewable energy source in the western United States. In: Solomon B, Luzadis VA (eds) Renewable energy from forest resources in the United States. Routledge, New York, pp 299–322Google Scholar
  182. Volk TA, Verwijist T, Therakan PJ, Abrahamson LP, White EH (2004) Growing fuel: a sustainability assessment for willow biomass crops. Frontiers Ecol Environ 2:411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Wang G, Castiglione S, Chen Y, Li L, Han Y, Tian Y, Gabriel DW, Han Y, Mang K, Sala F (1996) Poplar (Populus nigra L.) plants transformed with a Bacillus thuringiensis toxin gene: insecticidal activity and genomic analysis. Transgenic Res 5:289–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Warren TJ, Poulter R, Parfitt R (1995) Converting biomass to electricity on a farm-sized scale using downdraft gasification and a spark-ignition engine. Bioresour Technol 52:95–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Weng J-K, Li X, Bonawitz N, Chapple C (2008) Emerging strategies of lignin engineering and degradation for cellulosic biofuel production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:166–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Wheals AE, Basso LC, Denise M, Alves G, Amorim H (1999) Fuel ethanol after 25 years. Trends Biotechnol 17:482–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. White RH (1987) Effect of lignin content and extractives on the higher heating value of wood. Wood Fiber Sci 19:446–452Google Scholar
  188. Williams CG (2005) Framing the issues on transgenic forests. Nat Biotechnol 23:530–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Williams CG, Davis B (2005) Rate of transgene spread via long-distance seed dispersal in Pinus taeda. For Ecol Manage 217:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1993) Characterization of the expression of a desiccation-responsive rd29 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana and analysis of its promoter in transgenic plants. Mol Gen Genet 236:331–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1994) A novel cis-acting element in an Arabidopsis gene is involved in responsiveness to drought, low temperature, or high salt-stress. Plant Cell 6:251–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  192. Yanofsky MF (2006) Methods of suppressing flowering in transgenic plants. United States Patent No. 6,987,214 B1Google Scholar
  193. Yat SC, Berger A, Shonnard DR (2008) Kinetic characterization of dilute surface acid hydrolysis of timber varieties and switchgrass. Bioresour Technol 99:3855–3863PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Yi SY, Kim JH, Joung YH, Lee S, Kim WT, Yu SH, Choi D (2004) The pepper transcription factor CaPF1 confers pathogen and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 136:2862–2874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Young M, Boland M, Hofstrand D (2007) Current issues in ethanol production. Agricultural Marketing Resource Center, Iowa State University, Retrieved 7 November 2009
  196. Zeachem (2008) Zeachem, Inc announces long-term poplar tree feedstocksupply agreement with Greenwood Resources, Inc for a biorefinery (press release 11 February 2008), Retrieved 10 November 2009
  197. Zhang TT, Song YZ, Liu YD, Guo XQ, Zhu CX, Wen FJ (2008) Overexpression of phospholipase Dα gene enhances drought and salt tolerance of Populus tomentosa. J Chin Sci Bull 53L:3658–3665, doi:10.1007/s11434-008-0476-1Google Scholar
  198. Zhang X, Fowler SG, Cheng H, Lou Y, Rhee SY, Stockinger EJ, Thomashow MF (2004) Freezing-sensitive tomato has a functional CBF cold response pathway, but a CBF regulon that differs from that of freezing-tolerant Arabidopsis. Plant J 39:905–919PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. Zhu, JY, Wang GS, Pan XJ, Gleisner (2008) The status of and key barriers in lignocellulosic ethanol production: a technological perspective. In: Wu C, Yuan Z, Ma L, Zhuang X (eds) International Conference on Biomass Energy Technologies, 3–5 December 2008, vol 1. The Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Science, Guangzhou, China. pp 1–12Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maud A. W. Hinchee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lauren N. Mullinax
    • 1
  • William H. Rottmann
    • 1
  1. 1.ArborGen, LLCSummervilleUSA

Personalised recommendations