Criteria for a Sustainable Bioenergy Infrastructure and Lifecycle

  • Jürgen ScheffranEmail author
Part of the Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry book series (AGRICULTURE, volume 66)


The biofuel boom has raised great expectations regarding renewable, domestic and carbon-free bioenergy sources but at the same time has led to concerns about the adverse environmental and socio-economic implications such as land-use competition, deforestation and market distortions. In this context, bioenergy systems have to demonstrate their environmental sustainability, economic viability and societal acceptability compared with fossil fuels and alternative energy sources. To address some of these concerns, it is important to optimize the entire bioenergy infrastructure, value chain and lifecycle, including feedstock production, harvesting and transportation, processing, distribution and use. Integrated assessment approaches and lifecycle analysis are scientific tools that can be used to support decision-making on the future of bioenergy. Concrete measures include development of integrated biorefineries, minimizing transportation costs and cascading use of residues and waste material. Improving the energy and carbon balance, and reducing the impact of bioenergy pathways on land, water and the biosphere are key requirements. Food security should not be threatened, favoring efficient cellulosic materials over food crops. In addition, minimum social standards need to be respected. Respective principles and criteria will be discussed, as part of global efforts to develop sustainability standards for certification of biomass products.


Corn Stover Energy Crop Cellulosic Ethanol Bioenergy Crop Sustainability Criterion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was supported in part by the German Science Foundation (DFG) through the Cluster of Excellence ’CliSAP’ (EXC177).


  1. Al-Kaisi M (2000) Crop water use or evapotranspiration. Integrated Crop Management, Iowa State University,–29–2000/wateruse.html Google Scholar
  2. Ausubel JH (2007) Renewable and nuclear heresies. Int J Nuclear Gov Econ Ecol 1(3):229–243Google Scholar
  3. Babcock BA, Hayes DJ, Lawrence JD (eds) (2008) Using distillers grains in the US and international livestock and poultry industries. Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information Center, Iowa State University, Ames, IAGoogle Scholar
  4. Barreto P (2008) Implications of the climate change debate on land tenure in the Brazilian Amazon. Speech text for the Conference on New Challenges for Land Policy and Administration, 14–15 February 2008, The World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaschek H, Ezeji T, Scheffran J (eds) (2010) Biofuels from agricultural wastes and byproducts. Blackwell, Oxford (in press)Google Scholar
  6. Brat I, Machalaba D (2007) Can ethanol get a ticket to ride? Wall Street Journal, 1 February, p B1Google Scholar
  7. Brinkman N, Wang M, Weber T, Darlington T (2005) Well-to-Wheels analysis of advanced fuel/vehicle systems: a North American study of energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and criteria pollutant emissions. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, ILGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown R, Orwig E, Nemeth J, Subietta Rocha C (2007) Economic potential for ethanol expansion in Illinois. Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs at Western Illinois University, Macomb, ILGoogle Scholar
  9. Council of the European Union (2008) Presidency suggestions for a common scheme of sustainability criteria for biofuels. 9 September 2008, Brussels. Council of the European Union website,–re01ad01.en08.pdf (viewed 15 October 2008)Google Scholar
  10. CRS (2007) Ethanol and other biofuels–potential for US–Brazil energy cooperation. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Dehue B, Hamelinck C, Reece G, de Lint S, Archer R, Garcia E (2008) Sustainability reporting within the RTFO: framework report, ECOFYS. Commissioned by UK Department for Transport (January 2008)Google Scholar
  12. Delucchi M (2006) Lifecycle analyses of biofuels.
  13. Denevan WM, Woods WI (2004) Discovery and awareness of anthropogenic Amazonian Dark Earths. University of Wisconsin–Madison, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, ILGoogle Scholar
  14. Dohleman FG, Heaton EA, Long SP (2010) Perennial grasses as second-generation sustainable feedstocks without conflict with food production. In: Khanna M, Scheffran J, Zilberman D (eds) Handbook of bioenergy economics and policy. Springer, New York, pp 27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dooley FJ, Cox M, Cox L (2008) Distillers grain handbook: a guide for Indiana producers to Using DDGS for animal feed. Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, Accessed 15 May 2009Google Scholar
  16. EAA (2007) Frequently asked questions about electrical vehicles. Electric Auto Association, Google Scholar
  17. Environmental Defense (2007) Potential impacts of biofuels expansion on natural resources: a case study of the Ogallala Aquifer region. Impacts of Biofuels Expansion.pdfGoogle Scholar
  18. Ezzati M, Kammen DM (2001) Quantifying the effects of exposure to indoor air pollution from biomass combustion on acute respiratory infections in developing countries. Environ Health Perspect 109:5481–5488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Faaij A, van Wijk A, van Doorn J, Curvers A, Waldheim L, Olsson E, Daey-Ouwens C (1997) Characteristics and availability of biomass waste and residues in the Netherlands for gasification. Biomass Bioenergy 12(4): 225–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. FAO (2003a) World agriculture: towards 2015/2030. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. FAO (2003b) Compendium of agricultural–environmental indicators 1989–91 to 2000. FAO Statistics Analysis Service, Statistics Division, RomeGoogle Scholar
  22. FAO (2008) The state of food and agriculture 2008. Biofuels: prospects, risks and opportunities. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  23. FAO/PISCES (2009) Small-scale bioenergy initiatives: brief description and preliminary lessons on livelihood impacts from case studies in Asia, Latin America and Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization/Practical Action Consulting, Policy Innovation Systems for Clean Energy Security, January, Google Scholar
  24. Fargione J, Hill JK, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319:1235–1238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Farrell AE, Plevin RJ, Turner BT, Jones AD, O’Hare M, Kammen D (2006) Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311:506–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fowles M (2007) Black carbon sequestration as an alternative to bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 31:426–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fraiture C de, Giordano M, Yongsong L (2008) Biofuels and implications for agricultural water use: blue impacts of green energy. Water Policy 10 [Suppl 1]:67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fritsche UR, Wiegmann K (2008) Ökobilanzierung der Umweltauswirkungen von Bioenergie-Konversionspfaden. Expertise for the WBGU Report “World in Transition: Future Bioenergy and Sustainable Land Use”. Google Scholar
  29. Fritsche UR, Hünecke K, Hermann A, Schulze F, Wiegmann K (2006) Sustainability standards for bioenergy. WWF Germany, Berlin, NovemberGoogle Scholar
  30. Gallagher E (2008) Gallagher Review of the indirect effects of biofuels production. Renewable Fuels Agency, London. Google Scholar
  31. GAO (2007) “Biofuels: DOE lacks a strategic approach to coordinate increasing production with infrastructure development and vehicle needs”, US Government Accountability Office, GAO-07-713, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Goolsby DA, Battaglin WA, Aulenbach BT, Hooper RP (2000) Nitrogen flux and sources in the Mississippi River basin. Sci Total Environ 248:75–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D (2006) Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:11206–11210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hill J, Polasky S, Nelson E, Tilman D, Huod H, Ludwig L, Neumann J, Zheng H, Bonta D (2009) Climate change and health costs of air emissions from biofuels and gasoline. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:2077–2082PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ICRISAT (2007) Pro-poor biofuels outlook for Asia and Africa: ICRISAT’s perspective. Working paper, 13 March, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Google Scholar
  36. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. IWMI (ed) (2007) Water for food. Water for life. A comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. International Water Management Institute, Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Jacobson MZ (2008) Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security. Energy Environ Sci 2:148–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kang S, Onal H, Ouyang Y, Scheffran J, Tursun D (2010) Optimizing the biofuels infrastructure: transportation networks and biorefinery locations in Illinois. In: Khanna M, Scheffran J, Zilberman D (Eds) Handbook of bioenergy economics and policy. Springer, New York, pp 151–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keeney D, Muller M (2006) Water use by ethanol plants: potential challenges, institute for agriculture and trade policy. October 2006, at Google Scholar
  41. Keeney D, Nanninga C (2008) Biofuel and global biodiversity. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  42. Khanna M, Dhungana B, Clifton-Brown J (2008) Costs of producing miscanthus and switchgrass for bioenergy in Illinois. Biomass Bioenergy 32(6):482–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Khanna M, Önal H, Chen X, Huang H (2010) Meeting biofuels targets: implications for land use, greenhouse gas emissions, and nitrogen use in Illinois. In: Khanna M, Scheffran J, Zilberman D (eds) Handbook of bioenergy economics and policy. Springer, New York, pp 289–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kim S, Dale BE (2004) Cumulative energy and global warming impact from the production of biomass for biobased products. J Ind Ecol 7:147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kim Y, Mosier NS, Hendrickson R, Ezeji T, Blaschek H, Dien B, Cotta M, Dale B, Ladisch MR (2008) Composition of corn dry-grind ethanol by-products: DDGS, wet cake, and thin stillage. Bioresour Technol 99:5165–5176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Knappe F, Böß A, Fehrenbach H, Giegrich J, Vogt R, Dehoust G, Fritsche U, Schüler D, Wiegmann K (2007) Stoffstrommanagement von Biomasseabfällen mit dem Ziel der Optimierung der Verwertung organischer Abfälle. Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes. UBA Texte 04/07. Institute for Energy and Environmental Research (IFEU), HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  47. Ladanei S, Vinterbäck J (2009) Global potential of sustainable biomass for energy. Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  48. Ladisch M, Dale B (eds) (2008) Cellulose conversion in dry grind plants. Bioresour Technol 99:5155–5260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Laird DA (2008) The charcoal vision: a win-win-win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permanently sequestering carbon, while improving soil and water quality. Agron J 100:178–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lehmann J (2007) A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mackinnon L (2010) EU Commission rejects binding sustainability criteria for biomass, BIOMASS INTEL 2/26/10,, accessed 14 March 2010Google Scholar
  52. Marris E (2006) Black is the new green. Nature 442:624–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mathews JA (2007) Viewpoint biofuels: what a biopact between North and South could achieve. Energy Policy 35:3550–3570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mueller S, Plevin R (2008) Global warming intensity of corn ethanol. BioCycle 49:50–53Google Scholar
  55. National Commission on Energy Policy (2004) Ending the energy stalemate: a bipartisan strategy to meet America’s energy challenges. National Commission on Energy Policy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  56. NRC (2007) Water implications of biofuels production in the United States. National Research Council, National Academies,
  57. NRC (2009) Liquid transportation fuels from coal and biomass: technological status, costs, and environmental impacts. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  58. NREL (2007) A national laboratory market and technology assessment of the 30x30 scenario. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report /TP-510-40942, JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  59. OECD (2008) Economic assessment of biofuel support policies. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Directorate for Trade and Agriculture, ParisGoogle Scholar
  60. Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow AF, Graham RL (2005) Biomass as feedstock for bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. Department of Energy / Department of Agriculture, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pimentel D (2003) Ethanol fuels: energy balance, economics and environmental impacts are negative. Nat Resour Res 12:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Post WM, Kwon KC (2000) Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: processes and potential. Glob Change Biol 6:317–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. RFA (2010) Industry Statistics. Renewable Fuel Association,
  64. Rosillo-Calle F, Walter A (2006) Global market for bioethanol: historical trends and future prospects. Energy Sustain Dev 10:18–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Runge CF, Senauer B (2007) How biofuels could starve the poor. Foreign Affairs (May/June):41–53Google Scholar
  66. Scheffran J (2009) Biofuel Conflicts and human security: toward a sustainable bioenergy life cycle and infrastructure. Swords Ploughshares XVII(Summer):4–10Google Scholar
  67. Scheffran J (2010a) The global demand for biofuels: technologies, markets and policies. In: Vertes A, Blaschek HP, Yukawa H, Qureshi N (eds) Biomass to biofuels: strategies for global industries. Wiley, New York, pp 27–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Scheffran J (2010b) Bioenergy between sustainability and development: land use, food security and lifecycle analysis. In: Amann E, Baer W, Coes D (eds) Energy, biofuels and development: comparing Brazil and the United States. Routledge, Oxford (in press)Google Scholar
  69. Scheffran J, Bendor T (2009) Bioenergy and land use: a spatial-agent dynamic model of energy crop production in Illinois. Int J Environ Pollut 39:4–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Scheffran J, Battaglini A, Weber M (2004) Energie aus Biomasse und Bioabfällen—Brennstoff der Zukunft? In: Johnke B, Scheffran J, Soyez K (eds) Abfall, Energie und Klima. Schmidt, Berlin, pp 160–185Google Scholar
  71. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Tokgoz S, Hayes D, Yu TH (2008) Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land use change. Science 319:1238–1240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sheehan J, Aden A, Paustian K, Killian K, Bremer J, Walsh M, Nelson R (2004) Energy and environmental aspects of using corn stover for fuel ethanol. J Ind Ecol 7:117–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Singh V, Johnston D, Naidu K, Rausch KD, Belyea RL, Tumbleson ME (2004) Effect of modified dry grind corn processes on fermentation characteristics and DDGS composition. In: Proceedings of the Corn Utilization and Technology Conference, 7–9 June 2004, Indianapolis, INGoogle Scholar
  74. Smeets E, Junginger M, Faaij A, Walter A, Dolzan P, Turkenburg W (2008) The sustainability of Brazilian ethanol—an assessment of the possibilities of certified production. Biomass Bioenergy 32:781–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Smith T, Miller K, Lindenberg J (2009) Sustainable biofuel standards and certification. Swords Ploughshares XVII(Summer):26–31Google Scholar
  76. Solomon BD, Barnes JR, Halvorsen KE (2007) Grain and cellulosic ethanol: history, economies, and energy policy. Biomass Bioenergy 31(6):416–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sylvester-Bradley R (2008) Critique of Searchinger (2008) & related papers assessing indirect effects of biofuels on land-use change. A study commissioned by AEA Technology as part of the Gallagher Biofuels Review, Version 3.2, 12-6-2008Google Scholar
  78. Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley JA, Hill J, Larson J, Lynd L, Pacala S, Reilly J, Searchinger T, Somerville C, Williams R (2009) Beneficial biofuels—the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 17:270–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tyner WE (2009) The integration of energy and agricultural markets. Presented at the 27th International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, Beijing, China, August 16–22, 20IAAE 20paper 202009-3.pdfGoogle Scholar
  80. UN (2007) Sustainable bioenergy: a framework for decision makers. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  81. UN (2008) High level task force on the global food crisis: elements of a comprehensive framework for action. United Nations, New York, Draft, 3 June 2008Google Scholar
  82. US EPA (2007) Renewable fuel standard implementation. Accessed 15 May 2009
  83. Varghese S (2007) Biofuels and global water challenges. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
  84. Vidal J (2006) Cost of water shortage: civil unrest, mass migration and economic collapse. Guardian, August 2006. http://www.iwmi
  85. von Braun J, Pachauri RK (2006) The promises and challenges of biofuels for the poor in developing countries. Annual Report 2005–2006. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  86. Wallace R, Ibsen K, McAloon A, Yee W (2005) Feasibility study for co-locating and integrating ethanol production plants from corn starch and lignocellulogic feedstocks, revised January edn. NREL/TP-510-37092 USDA/USDOE/NRELCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wang M (2004) Fuel-cycle analysis of conventional and alternative fuel vehicles. In: Cleveland CJ (ed) Encyclopedia of energy, vol 2. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  88. WBGU (2009) Future bioenergy and sustainable land use. German Advisory Council on Global Change, London: Earthscan. Google Scholar
  89. WDPA (2008) World database on protected areas. UNEP-WCMC website.
  90. Wooley R, Ruth M, Sheehan J, Ibsen K, Majdeski H, Galvez A (1999) Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol—process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hyrolysis—current and futuristic scenarios. Report No. TP-580-26157, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, COCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Worldwatch (2007) Biofuels for transportation, global potential and implications for sustainable agriculture and energy in the 21st century. Worldwatch Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  92. Wright M, Brown RC (2007) Establishing the optimal sizes of different kinds of biorefineries. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining 1(3):191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Xinhua (2007) China to produce liquid bio-fuel with non-food crops.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Geography, KlimaCampusUniversity of Hamburg, ZMAWHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations