Advertisement

The Problem is the Solution: the Role of Biofuels in the Transition to a Regenerative Agriculture

  • Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte
  • Chad C. Hellwinckel
Chapter
Part of the Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry book series (AGRICULTURE, volume 66)

Abstract

Due to the rapid rate of soil loss, fossil energy dependence and climate change gases associated with industrial agriculture, the current model cannot provide sustainable food or energy in the future. It is imperative that international agricultural and energy policies be coordinated so that a transition to new regenerative systems can be achieved. Biofuels can play a key role in this transition by increasing long-term prices of all commodities, thereby creating the opportunity for farmers to invest in regenerative practices. Such a policy must be implemented simultaneously with national and international investments in research, extension and infrastructure of regenerative agriculture.

Keywords

Food Security Food Price Commodity Price Regenerative Practice Environmental Footprint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ackerman F, Stanton EA (2008) What we’ll pay if global warming continues unchecked. Natural Resources Defense Council. MayGoogle Scholar
  2. Aksoy A, Isik-Dikmelik A (2008) Are low food prices pro-poor? net food buyers and sellers in low-income countries. World Bank—Policy Research Working Paper, vol 4642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altieri M (2008) Small farms as a planetary ecological asset: five key reasons why we should support the revitalization of small farms in the global south. Food First. Institute for Food and Development Policy, Oakland, CAGoogle Scholar
  4. Bender MH (2002) Energy in agriculture: lessons from the Sunshine Farm project. In: Proceedings of the Third Biennial International Workshop, Advances in Energy Studies: Reconsidering the Importance of Energy, 24–28 September 2002, Porto Venere, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  5. Brundage AL, Petersen WE (1952) A comparison between daily rotational grazing and continuous grazing. J Dairy Sci 35:623–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dagget D (2000) Beyond the rangeland conflict: toward a West that works. University of Nevada PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson EA, Janssens IA (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440:165–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De La Torre Ugarte DE (2007) The contributions and challenges of supply management in a new institutional agricultural trade framework. In: EcoFair trade dialogue. Heinrich Boll Foundation. Discussion Paper 6, MarchGoogle Scholar
  9. De La Torre Ugarte DE, Dellachiesa A (2007) Advancing the agricultural trade agenda: beyond subsidies. Georgetown Int Environ Law Rev 19:775–796Google Scholar
  10. Faeth P, Crosson P (1994) Building the case for sustainable agriculture. Environment 36(1):16–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. FAO (2001) Integrated agriculture–aquaculture: a primer. Series title: FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, T407. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  12. FAO (2006) The state of food insecurity in the World 2006: eradicating world hunger—taking stock ten years after the World Food Summit. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  13. FAO (2008) Climate, climate change and agropastoral practices in the Sahel region. Natural Resources Management and Environment Department Publication, September. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  14. Fukuoka M (1978) One straw revolution. Rodale, Emmaus, PAGoogle Scholar
  15. Gifford RM (1976) An overview of fuel used for crops and national agricultural systems. Search 7:412–417Google Scholar
  16. Gitau T, Gitau MW, Waltner-Toews D (2009) Integrated assessment of health and sustainability of agroecosystems. CRC/Taylor & Francis, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  17. Green M (1978) Eating oil: energy use in food production. Westview, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall CAS, Cleveland CJ, Kaufmann R (1986) Energy and resource quality: the ecology of the economic process. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Heller M, Keoleian G (2000) Life-cycle based sustainability indicators for assessment of the US food system. Center for Sustainable Systems. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
  20. Holmgren D (2002) Permaculture: principles and pathways beyond sustainability. Holmgren Design Services, Hepburn, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  21. IEA (2008) World Energy Outlook 2008. International Energy Agency, DecemberGoogle Scholar
  22. IFPRI (2002) Green Revolution: curse or blessing? Issue Brief 11. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  23. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackson W (1980) New roots for agriculture. University of Nebraska PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Kwibuka E (2008) Coffee farmers get bikes on credit. The New Times, Rwanda, 15 March, http://projectrwanda.org/news/coffee-farmers-get-bikes-on-credit. Cited 30 March 2009
  26. King FH (1911) Farmers of forty centuries: permanent agriculture in China, Korea, and Japan. Organic Gardening Press, Emmaus, PACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koppelaar R (2008) Monthly report. OilWatch Monthly. http://www.peakoil.nl/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2008_december_oilwatch_monthly.pdf. Cited 25 March 2009
  28. Lal R, Kimble JM, Follett RF, Cole CV (1998) The potential of US cropland to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Ann Arbor Press, ChelseaGoogle Scholar
  29. Mollison B (1990) Permaculture: a designers’ manual. Island Covelo, CAGoogle Scholar
  30. Montgomery DR (2007a) Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:13268–13272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Montgomery DR (2007b) Dirt: the erosion of civilizations. University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  32. Myers N (1993) Gaia: an atlas of planet management. Anchor/Doubleday, Garden City, NYGoogle Scholar
  33. Pretty J (2005) The Earthscan reader in sustainable agriculture. Earthscan, UKGoogle Scholar
  34. Quinn M (2006) The power of community: how Cuba Survived peak oil. Permaculture Activist Issue #59, SpringGoogle Scholar
  35. Salatin J (1996) Salad bar beef. Polyface, Swoope, VAGoogle Scholar
  36. Savory A (1998) Holistic management: a new framework for decision making. Island, CoveloGoogle Scholar
  37. Schupska S (2007) New Zealand partnership may boost milk in Georgia. Georgia Face, University of Georgia College of Agriculture. 1 Nov http://georgiafaces.caes.uga.edu/storypage.cfm?storyid=3264. Cited 20 March 2009Google Scholar
  38. Simmons MR (2007) Another nail in the coffin of the case against peak oil. White paper, http://www.simmonsco-intl.com. Cited 25 March 2009Google Scholar
  39. Soule JD, Piper JK (1992) Farming in nature’s image: an ecological approach to agriculture. Island, CoveloGoogle Scholar
  40. Troeh FR, Hobbs JA, Donahue RL (2003) Soil and water conservation for productivity and environmental protection, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang MC, Saricks D, Santini D (1999) Effects of fuel ethanol use on fuel-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions. US Department of Energy, Argonne National Laboratory, Center for Transportation Research, Argonne, ILGoogle Scholar
  42. World Bank (2007) 2008 World Development Report, Agriculture Development. Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yeomans PA (1964) Water for every farm: Yeomans keyline plan. CreateSpace, http://www.createspace.com Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte
    • 1
  • Chad C. Hellwinckel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsThe University of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations