Skip to main content

Delivering Tutoring Feedback Using Persuasive Dialogues

  • Conference paper
Book cover Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6095))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1540 Accesses

Abstract

We are developing a general argumentation framework for implementing tutoring feedback in the form of persuasive dialogues. The objective is to have an intelligent tutoring system capable of arguing with the student to convince him of the rationale of the feedback provided to him. The application domain is that of medical diagnosis skill learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Graesser, A.C., VanLehn, K., Rosé, C.P., Jordan, P.W., Harter, D.: Intelligent tutoring systems with conversational dialogue. AI Magazine 22(4), 39–51 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yuan, T., Moore, D., Grierson, A.: A human-computer dialogue system for educational debate, a computational dialectics approach. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 18, 3–26 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kabanza, F., Bisson, G., Charneau, A., Jang, T.S.: Implementing tutoring strategies into a patient simulator for clinical reasoning learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence In Medicine (AIIM) 38, 79–96 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karsten, S., Weinberger, A., Fischer, F.: Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2(4), 421–447 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pinkwart, N., Aleven, V., Ashley, K., Lynch, C.: Evaluating legal argument instruction with graphical representations using largo. In: Proceeding of the 2007 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 101–108 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walton, D.: Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory. University of Toronto Press (1996b)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Walton, D.: Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Erbaum, Mahwah (1996a)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), 429–448 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore, D.: Dialogue game theory for intelligent tutoring systems. Ph.d. dissertation, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rahati, A., Kabanza, F. (2010). Delivering Tutoring Feedback Using Persuasive Dialogues. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6095. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13436-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13437-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics