Abstract
Scholars in design science research in Information Systems and Technology (IS&T) argue that evaluation of developed and created artifacts is critical. We describe the evaluations of: 1) the use of personas in the development of ERPs (naturalistic evaluation), and 2) from an individual and organizational effectiveness view what a role-based ERP supports (artificial evaluation).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)
Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The Anatomy of a Design Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(5), 312–335 (2007)
Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Assessing Information System Design Theory in Perspective: How Useful was our 1992 Initial Rendition? Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6(2), 43–58 (2004)
Carlsson, S.A.: Developing Knowledge through IS Design Science Research: For Whom, What Type of Knowledge, and How. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19(2), 75–85 (2007)
McKay, J., Marshall, P.: Foundation of Design Science in Information Systems. Sparks working paper, RISO (Research into Information Systems in Organisations), Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia (2008)
Venable, J.: A Framework for Design Science Research Activities. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Information Resource Management Association Conference, Washington, DC, USA (2006)
Cooper, A.: The Inmates are Running the Asylum: Why High-tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity. Sams Publishing, Indianapolis (1999)
Microsoft Dynamics: Roles-based Business Productivity Software Designed for Your People, http://www.microsoft.com/dynamics
Nielsen, L.: Engaging Personas and Narrative Scenarios: A Study How a User-centered Approach Influenced the Perception of the Design Process in the e-Business Group at AstraZeneca. Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg (2004)
Quinn, R.E., Faerman, S.R., Thompson, M.P., McGrath, M.R.: Becoming a Master Manager. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1996)
Buenger, V., Daft, R.L., Conlon, E.J., Austin, J.: Competing Values in Organizations: Contextual Influences and Structural Consequences. Organization Science 7(5), 557–576 (1996)
Quinn, R.E., Rohrbaugh, J.: A Competing Values Approach to Organizational Effectiveness. Public Productivity Review 5(2), 122–140 (1981)
Hart, S.L., Quinn, R.E.: Roles Executives Play: CEOs, Behavioral Complexity, and Firm Performance. Human Relations 46, 543–574 (1993)
Quinn, R.E.: Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High Performance. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1988)
Quinn, R.E., Cameron, K.S.: Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria and effectiveness. Management Science 9(1), 33–51 (1983)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Carlsson, S., Johansson, B. (2010). Naturalistic and Artificial Evaluations of Personas and Role-Based Enterprise Systems. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds) Global Perspectives on Design Science Research. DESRIST 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6105. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_45
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13334-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13335-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)