Abstract
While the economic impact of, and the interest in, open source innovation and production has increased dramatically in recent years, there is still no widely accepted theory explaining its performance. We combine original fieldwork with agent-based simulation to propose that the performance of open source is surprisingly robust, even as it happens in seemingly harsh environments with free rider, rival goods, and high demand. Open source can perform well even when cooperators constitute a minority, although their presence reduces variance. Under empirically realistic assumptions about the level of cooperative behavior, open source can survive even increased rivalry and performance can thrive if demand is managed. The plausibility of the propositions is demonstrated through qualitative data and simulation results.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Raymond, E.S.: The Cathedral and the Bazaar. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (1999)
Henkel, J.: Champions of Revealing - The Role of Open Source Developers in Commercial Firms. Industrial and Corporate Change 18, 435–471 (2009)
von Hippel, E.: Open Source Software Projects as User Innovation Networks. In: Feller, J., Fitzgerald, B., Hissam, S.A., Lakhani, K.R. (eds.) Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software, pp. 267–278. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
Franke, N., Shah, S.: How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users. Research Policy 32, 157–178 (2003)
Lee, G.K., Cole, R.: From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development. Organization Science 14, 633–649 (2003)
Shah, S.: Community-Based Innovation & Product Development: Findings From Open Source Software and Consumer Sporting Goods. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (2003)
Benkler, Y.: Commons-Based Strategies and the Problems of Patents. Sci. 305, 1110–1111 (2004)
Benkler, Y., Nissenbaum, H.: Commons-based Peer Production and Virtue. Journal of Political Philosophy 14, 394–419 (2006)
Berry, D.M.: The Contestation of Code: A Preliminary Investigation into the Discourse of the Free/Libre and Open Source Movements. Critical Discourse Studies 1, 65–89 (2004)
Maurer, S.M., Rai, A., Sali, A.: Finding Cures for Tropical Diseases: Is Open Source an Answer? PLOS Medicine 1, E56 (2004)
Bodie, M.T.: The Future of the Casebook: An Argument for an Open-Source Approach. Journal of Legal Studies 57, 10–35 (2007)
Guth, R.A.: Asia to Develop Software to Rely Less on Microsoft. The Wall Street Journal, B4 (2003)
Lohr, S.: Novell to Buy SuSE Linux for $210 Million, p. 6. The New York Times, New York (2003)
O’Mahony, S.: The Emergence of A New Commercial Actor: Community Managed Software Projects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University (2002)
Kogut, B., Metiu, A.: Open-source Software Development and Distributed Innovation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 17, 248–264 (2001)
von Krogh, G., von Hippel, E.: The Promise of Research on Open Source Software. Management Science 52, 975–984 (2006)
von Krogh, G., von Hippel, E.: Special issue on open source software development. Research Policy 32, 1149–1157 (2003)
Shah, S.K.: Motivation, Governance and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development. Management Science 52, 1000–1014 (2006)
von Hippel, E., von Krogh, G.: Open source software and the private-collective innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science 14, 209–223 (2003)
Roberts, J.A., Hann, I.-H., Slaughter, S.A.: Understanding the Motivations, Participation and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects. Management Science 52, 984–999 (2006)
MacCormack, A., Rusnak, J., Baldwin, C.Y.: Exploring the Structure of Complex Software Designs: An Empirical Study of Open Source and Proprietary Code. Management Science 52, 1015–1030 (2006)
O’Mahony, S., Ferraro, F.: The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community. Academy of Management Journal 50, 1079–1106 (2007)
Casadesus-Masanell, R., Ghemawat, P.: Dynamic Mixed Duopoly: A Model Motivated by Linux vs. Windows. Management Science 52, 1072–1084 (2006)
Economides, N., Katsamakas, E.: Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry. Management Science 52, 1057–1071 (2006)
Häfliger, S., von Krogh, G., Späth, S.: Code Reuse in Open Source Software. Mangement Science 54, 180–193 (2008)
Majchrzak, A.: The Effect of Expertise Sharing and Integrating Behaviors in Wiki-based Organizational Intranets. Working Paper (2009)
Jeppesen, L.B., Lakhani, K.R.: Marginality and Problem Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search. Organization Science (forthcoming)
Anthony, D., Smith, S.W., Williamson, T.: Explaining Quality in Internet Collective Goods: Zealots and Good Samaritans in the Case of Wikipedia. Rationality and Society 21, 283–306 (2009)
Bonaccorsi, A., Giannangeli, S., Rossi, C.: Entry Strategies Under Competing Standards. Hybrid Business Models in the Open Source Software Industry Management Science 52, 1085–1098 (2006)
von Hippel, E.: Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
West, J.: How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Research Policy 32, 1259–1285 (2003)
Henkel, J.: Selective Revealing in Open Innovation Processes: The Case of Embedded Linux. Research Policy 35, 953–969 (2006)
Waguespack, D.M., Fleming, L.: Scanning the Commons? Evidence on the Benefits to Startups Participating in Open Standards Development. Management Science 55, 210–223 (2009)
Maurer, S.M., Scotchmer, S.: Open Source Software: The New Intellectual Property Paradigm. National Bureau for Economic Research Working Paper W12148 (2006)
Shah, S.K.: Open Beyond Software. In: Cooper, D., DiBona, C., Stone, M. (eds.) Open Sources 2.0: The Continuing Evolution, pp. 339–360. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2005)
Zittrain, J.: The Future of the Internet – and How to Stop It. Yale University Press (2008)
Uehara, E.: Dual Exchange Theory, Social Networks, and Informal Social Support. American Journal of Sociology 96, 521–557 (1990)
Hardin, G.: The Tragedy of the Commons. Sci., 1243–1248 (1968)
Olson, M.: The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1965)
Milinski, M., Semmann, D., Krambeck, H.-J.: Reputation helps solve the ’tragedy of the commons’. Nature 415, 424–426 (2002)
Cornes, R., Sandler, T.: The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)
Mockus, A., Fielding, R.T., Herbsleb, J.D.: Two Case Studies of Open Source Software Development: Apache and Mozilla. In: Feller, J., Fitzgerald, B., Hissam, S.A., Lakhani, K.R. (eds.) Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software, pp. 163–209. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
Lerner, J., Tirole, J.: Economic Perspectives on Open Source. In: Feller, J., Fitzgerald, B., Hissam, S.A., Lakhani, K.R. (eds.) Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software, pp. 47–78. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
Lakhani, K.R., von Hippel, E.: How Open Source Software Works: Free User to User Assistance. Research Policy 32, 923–943 (2003)
Lessig, L.: Open Code and Open Societies. In: Feller, J., Fitzgerald, B., Hissam, S.A., Lakhani, K.R. (eds.) Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software, pp. 349–360. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
Free Software Foundation, http://www.gnu.org/philosophy
Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (1990)
Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine De Gruyter, New York (1967)
Maanen, J.V.: Different Strokes - Qualitative Research in the Administrative Science Quarterly from 1956-1996. In: Maanen, J.V. (ed.) Qualitative Studies of Organizations, vol. 1. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1998)
Perlow, L.A.: The Time Famine: Toward a Sociology of Work Time. Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 57 (1999)
Lewin, K.: Action Research and Minority Problems. Journal of Social Issues 2, 34–46 (1946)
Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G.: An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1982)
Cyert, R., March, J.G.: A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1963)
Black, L.J., Carlile, P.R., Repenning, N.P.: A Dynamic Theory of Expertise and Occupational Boundaries in New Technology Implementation: Building on Barley’s Study of CT Scanning. Administrative Science Quarterly 49, 572–607 (2004)
Rudolph, J.W., Repenning, N.P.: Disaster Dynamics: Understanding the Role of Quantity in Organizational Collapse. Administrative Science Quarterly 47, 1–31 (2002)
Repenning, N.R., Sterman, J.D.: Capability Traps and Self-Confirming Attribution Errors in the Dynamics of Process Improvement. Administrative Science Quarterly 47, 265 (2002)
Bonaccorsi, A., Rossi, C.: Why Open Source software can succeed. Research Policy 32, 1243–1258 (2003)
Moss, S., Edmonds, B.: Sociology and Simulation: Statistical and Qualitative Cross-Validation. American Journal of Sociology 110, 1095–1131 (2005)
Zeitlyn, D.: Gift economies in the development of open source software: anthropological reflections. Research Policy 32, 1287–1291 (2003)
Kollock, P.: The Economics of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In: Smith, M.A., Kollock, P. (eds.) Communities in Cyberspace, pp. 220–239. Routledge, New York (1999)
Benkler, Y.: The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven (2006)
von Krogh, G., Späth, S., Lakhani, K.R.: Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study. Research Policy 32, 1217–1241 (2003)
Koch, S., Schneider, G.: Effort, Cooperation and Coordination in an Open Source Software Project: GNOME. Information Systems Journal 12, 27–42 (2002)
Kuk, G.: Strategic Interaction and Knowledge Sharing in the KDE Developer Mailing List. Management Science 52, 1031–1042 (2006)
Giles, J.: Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438, 900–901 (2005)
Jeppesen, L.B., Laursen, K.: The role of lead users in knowledge sharing. Research Policy 38, 1582–1589 (2009)
Kurzban, R.O., Houser, D.: An experimental investigation of cooperative types in human groups: A complement to evolutionary theory and simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102, 1803–1807 (2005)
Thomas-Hunt, M.C., Ogden, T.Y., Neale, M.A.: Who’s Really Sharing? Effects of Social and Expert Status on Knowledge Exchange Within Groups. Management Science 49 (2003)
Dahlander, L., Mckelvey, M.: Who is not developing open source software? non-users, users, and developers Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14, 617–635 (2005)
Alexy, O., Henkel, J.: Promoting the Penguin: Who is Advocating Open Source Software in Commercial Settings? Working Paper (2007)
Leach, J.: A course in public economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S.: Heterogeneous Social Preferences And The Dynamics Of Free Riding In Public Good Experiments. Working Paper The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham (2008)
Kim, J., Lee, S.M., Olson, D.L.: Knowledge Sharing: Effects of Cooperative Type and Reciprocity Level. International Journal of Knowledge Management 2, 1–16 (2006)
Simpson, B., Willer, R.: Altruism and indirect reciprocity: The interaction of person and situation in prosocial behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly 71, 37–52 (2008)
Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S.: Strong Reciprocity, Human Cooperation and the Enforcement of Social Norms. Human Nature 13, 1–25 (2002)
Ishii, K., Kurzban, R.: Public Goods Games in Japan: Cultural and Individual Differences in Reciprocity. Human Nature 19, 138–156 (2008)
Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U.: The Nature of Human Altruism. Nature 425, 785–791 (2003)
Fowler, J.H., Christakis, N.A.: Cooperative Behaviour Cascades in Human Social Networks. Working Paper (2009)
Lenth, R.V.: Some Practical Guidelines for Effective Sample-Size Determination. The American Statistician 55, 187–193 (2001)
Hannan, M.T., Freeman, J.: Structural Inertia and Organizational Change. American Sociological Review 49, 149–164 (1984)
Biggart, N.W., Delbridge, R.: Systems of Exchange. Academy of Management Review 29, 28–49 (2004)
Levine, S.S., Prietula, M.J.: Towards a Contingency Theory of Knowledge Exchange in Organizations. In: Weaver, K.M. (ed.) Best Paper Proceedings, Academy of Management, Atlanta (2006)
Thomas, G.M., Walker, H.A., Morris, Z.J.: Legitimacy and Collective Action. Social Forces 65, 378–404 (1986)
Meyer, J.W., Rowan, B.: Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83, 340–363 (1977)
Granovetter, M.: Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91, 481–510 (1985)
Uzzi, B.: Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 35–67 (1997)
Ekeh, P.P.: Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1974)
Baker, W.E., Levine, S.S.: Mechanisms of Generalized Exchange. Working Paper (2009), http://ssrn.com/abstract=1352101
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 IFIP
About this paper
Cite this paper
Levine, S.S., Prietula, M.J. (2010). Where and When Can Open Source Thrive? Towards a Theory of Robust Performance. In: Ågerfalk, P., Boldyreff, C., González-Barahona, J.M., Madey, G.R., Noll, J. (eds) Open Source Software: New Horizons. OSS 2010. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 319. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13244-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13244-5_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13243-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13244-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)