Advertisement

Persistent Activation Blobs in Spiking Neural Networks with Mexican Hat Connectivity

  • Filip Piekniewski
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6114)

Abstract

Short range excitation, long range inhibition sometimes referred to as mexican hat connectivity seems to play important role in organization of the cortex, leading to fairly well delineated sites of activation. In this paper we study a computational model of a grid filled with rather simple spiking neurons with mexican hat connectivity. The simulation shows, that when stimulated with small amount of random noise, the model results in a stable activated state in which the spikes are organized into persistent blobs of activity. Furthermore, these blobs exhibit significant lifetime, and stable movement across the domain. We analyze lifetimes and trajectories of the spots, arguing that they can be interpreted as basic computational charge units of the so called spike flow model introduced in earlier work.

Keywords

spiking networks mexican hat connectivity spike flow model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Izhikevich, E.M.: Polychronization: Computation with spikes. Neural Comput. 18(2), 245–282 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Piȩkniewski, F., Schreiber, T.: Emergence of scale-free spike flow graphs in recurrent neural networks. In: Proc. IEEE FOCI 2007, pp. 357–362 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Piȩkniewski, F., Schreiber, T.: Spontaneous scale-free structure of spike flow graphs in recurrent neural networks. Neural Networks 21(10), 1530–1536 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Piȩkniewski, F.: Emergence of scale-free graphs in dynamical spiking neural networks. In: Proc. IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Orlando, Florida, USA, August 2007, pp. 755–759. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Piekniewski, F.: Robustness of power laws in degree distributions for spiking neural networks. In: Proc. IEEE 2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Atlanta, Georgia, USA, June 2009, pp. 2541–2546. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sporns, O., Chialvo, D.R., Kaiser, M., Hilgetag, C.C.: Organization, development and function of complex brain networks. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8(9), 418–425 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eguíluz, V.M., Chialvo, D.R., Cecchi, G.A., Baliki, M., Apkarian, A.V.: Scale-free brain functional networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(1) (January 2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Izhikevich, E.M.: Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks (14), 1569–1572 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Izhikevich, E.M.: Which model to use for cortical spiking neurons? IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 15(5), 1063–1070 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Izhikevich, E.M.: Dynamical systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting. MIT Press, Boston (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Filip Piekniewski
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Mathematics and Computer ScienceNicolaus Copernicus UniversityTorunPoland

Personalised recommendations