System and User Characteristics in the Adoption and Use of e-Learning Management Systems: A Cross-Age Study
This study analyses the most relevant factors which affect users’ intention to use e-learning management systems, with special focus in the difference of age. The fundamental hypothesis is that there can be established a influence of behavioural intention, attitude toward behaviour, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, subjective norms and social influence in the intention to use of e-learning management systems, with user and system factors as antecedents.
In order to design the theoretical model, the most relevant technology acceptance models have been reviewed from literature, with special focus in learning management systems (LMS) adoption. The result of this review is a unified model which has been validated with data collected from 94 people through a web questionnaire. The results from this data have been analysed using the partial least squares (PLS) method. The analysis has demonstrated the predictive relevance and the validation of the model for users between 26 to 35 years old and 36 to 45 years old.
KeywordsLMS technology acceptance models e-learning TAM partial least squares
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. The e-Learning Action Plan, European Commission (March 2001), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2001/com2001_0172en01.pdf
- 4.Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)Google Scholar
- 7.Vallerand, R.J., Ratelle, C.F.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. University of Rochester Press (2002)Google Scholar
- 10.Bandura, A.: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1986)Google Scholar
- 14.Barclay, D., Higgins, C., Thompson, R.: The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computing Adoption and Use as an Illustration. Technologies Studies (Special Issue on Research Methodology) 2(2), 285–309 (1995)Google Scholar