Skip to main content

Experiential Collaborative Learning and Preferential Thinking

  • Conference paper
Technology Enhanced Learning. Quality of Teaching and Educational Reform (TECH-EDUCATION 2010)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 73))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3533 Accesses

Abstract

The paper presents a Project-Based Learning (shortly, PBL) approach in a collaborative educational environment aimed to develop design ability and creativity of students coming from different engineering disciplines. Three collaborative learning experiences in product design were conducted in order to study their impact on preferred thinking styles of students. Using a thinking style inventory, pre- and post-survey data was collected and successively analyzed through ANOVA techniques. Statistically significant results showed students successfully developed empathy and an openness to multiple perspectives. Furthermore, data analysis confirms that the proposed collaborative learning experience positively contributes to increase awareness in students’ thinking styles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agogino, A.M., Newman, C., Bauer, M., Mankoff, J.: Perceptions of the Design Process: An Examination of Gendered Aspects of New Product Development. Int. J. Engineering Education 20(3), 452–460 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atman, C.J., Kilgore, D., McKenna, A.: Characterizing Design Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study of Engineering Designers’ Use of Language. J. of Engineering Education 97(3), 309–326 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. De Bono, E.: Six Thinking Hats. Penguin, England (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dorthy, L.B., Swap, W.C.: When Sparks Fly: Harnessing the Power of Group Creativity. Harvard Business School Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D.D., Leifer, L.J.: Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. J. Engineering Education 94, 103–120 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hammond, J.M., Harvey, C.M., Koubek, R.J., Compton, W.D., Darisipudi, A.: Distributed Collaborative Design Teams: Media Effects on Design Processes. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 18(2), 145–165 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ivanitskaya, L., Clark, D., Montgomery, G., Primeau, R.: Interdisciplinary Learning: Process and Outcomes. Inn. Higher Edu. 27(2), 95–111 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirton, M.J.: Adaption-Innovation. In: The context of diversity and change, Rev. edn. Routledge, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kolodner, J.L., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntembakar, S.: Putting a Student-Centered Learning by DesignTM Curriculum into Practice: Lessons Learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences 12(4) (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mamykina, L., Candy, L., Edmonds, E.: Collaborative Creativity. Communication of the ACM 45(10), 96–99 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reilly, R.R., Lynn, G.S., Aronson, Z.L.: The Role of Personality in New Product Development Team Performance. Journal of Engineering & Technology Management 19(1), 39–58 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sofo, F.: Thinking styles of modern Chinese leaders: independence and exploration in an historically conditional China. Aus. J. Adult Learning 45(3), 304–330 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sofo, F.: Differences of degree or differences in kind? A comparative analysis of thinking styles. Int. J. Interdisciplinary Social Sc. 3(1), 293–301 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Sternberg, R.: Thinking styles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Volpentesta, A.P., Ammirato, S., Sofo, F.: Thinking Style Diversity and Collaborative Design Learning. In: Camarinha-Matos, L., Paraskakis, I., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds.) Leveraging Knowledge for Innovation in Collaborative Networks. IFIP AICT, vol. 307, pp. 785–796. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Volpentesta, A.P., Muzzupappa, M., Ammirato, S.: Critical thinking and concept design generation in a collaborative network. In: Camarinha-Matos, L., Picard, W. (eds.) Pervasive Collaborative Networks, vol. 16, pp. 157–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, L.F., Sternberg, R.J.: The nature of intellectual styles. Routledge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Volpentesta, A.P., Ammirato, S., Sofo, F. (2010). Experiential Collaborative Learning and Preferential Thinking. In: Lytras, M.D., et al. Technology Enhanced Learning. Quality of Teaching and Educational Reform. TECH-EDUCATION 2010. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 73. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13166-0_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13166-0_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13165-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13166-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics