Challenges of Implementing ESD in the Education Sector; Experiences in Norway

  • Astrid Sandås
  • Faye Benedict
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 73)

Abstract

This article presents and reflects on Norwegian experiences over a period of about 15 years with implementing the Norwegian national strategy for education for sustainable development (ESD) in the education system. We extract lessons about integration of ESD into education systems. After an introduction to central ideas of sustainable development and ESD, the article discusses the need for appropriate strategies and instruments. Key factors are collaboration to allow pupils and schools to actively contribute to a positive development locally and globally, interdisciplinary approaches to complex sustainability issues, and appropriate use of the ICT and other media. ESD programmes and activities should support school development and build the capacity of schools and teachers for integration of ESD.

Keywords

education for sustainable development collaboration school development participation media 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stortingsmelding nr 58: Miljøvernpolitikk for en bærekraftig utvikling (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Senge, P., et al.: The Necessary Revolution. How Individuals and Organisations are Working Together to Create a Sustainable World. Doubleday (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carsen, R.: A Silent Spring. Mariner Books (1962)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Næss, A.: Økologi, samfunn og livsstil. Universitetsforlaget (1976)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Government of Norway. Act of July 17, 1998 no. 6 Relating to Primary and Secondary Education and Training (the Education Act) (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Furco, A.: Experiential Education as a Pedaogy of Engagement. Paper presented at the National Society for Experiential Education, Seattle, Washington (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Engestrom, Y., Engestrom, R., Merja, K.: Polycontextuality and Boundary Crossing in Expert Cognition: Learning and Problem Solving in Complex Work Activities. Learning and Instruction 5(4), 319–336 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Østlandsforsking: Evaluation of Environmental Education Network. Østlandsforsking report (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wals, A.E.J., Geerling-Eijff, F., Hubeek, F., van der Kroon, S., Vader, J.: All Mixed Up? Instrumental and Emancipatory Learning Toward a More Sustainable World: Considerations for EE Policymakers. Applied Environmental Education & Communication 7(3), 55–65 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Astrid Sandås
    • 1
  • Faye Benedict
    • 2
  1. 1.Norwegian Directorate of EducationOsloNorway
  2. 2.TørdalNorway

Personalised recommendations