Advertisement

WSAN QoS Driven Control Model for Building Operations

  • Alie El-Din Mady
  • Menouer Boubekeur
  • Gregory Provan
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 73)

Abstract

Currently wireless based control systems lack appropriate development methodologies and tools. The control model and its underlying wireless network are typically developed separately, which can lead to unstable and suboptimal implementations. In this paper we introduce a hybrid-based design methodology that considers the performance parameters of the Wireless Sensor and Actuator Network (WSAN) in order to develop an optimized control system tailored to the specific application environment and sensor network conditions. We first identify the boundaries of the control parameters that maintain stable and optimal control model. Within these boundaries,we determine the optimal WSAN Quality of Service (QoS) parameters through a tuning process in order to reach to optimal Control/WSAN design as illustrated in the case study. The methodology has been illustrated through a distributed lighting control developed using our hybrid/multi-agent platform.

Keywords

Hybrid System Multi-agent System Building Automation WSAN PPD-Controller 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nakamura, M., Sakurai, A., Furubo, S., Ban, H.: Collaborative processing in Mote-based sensor/actuator networks for environment control application. In: Signal Processing, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin, Y., Megerian, S.: Low cost distributed actuation in largescale Ad hoc sensor-actuator networks. In: International Conference on Wireless Networks, Communications and Mobile Computing, pp. 975–980 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akyildiz, I.F., Kasimoglu, I.H.: Wireless sensor and actor networks: research challenges. In: Ad hoc networks, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, X., Goldsmith, A.: Cross-layer Design of Distributed Control over Wireless Networks. In: Advances in Control, Communications Networks (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    El-Hosseini, M.A., Hassanien, A.E., Abraham, A., Al-Qaheri, H.: Genetic Annealing Optimization: Design and Real World Applications. In: Proc. of Eighth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, ISDA 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kolokotsa, D., Pouliezos, A., Stavrakakis, G., Lazos, C.: Predictive control techniques for energy and indoor environmental quality management in buildings. In: Building and Environment (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Ptolemy Project, http://ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/
  8. 8.
    Tyndall National Institute, http://www.tyndall.ie/
  9. 9.
    Liu, A., Yu, H., Li, L.: An energy-efficiency and collision-free MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: 61st IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Demirkol, I., Ersoy, C., Alagoz, F.: MAC protocols for wireless sensor networks: a survey. IEEE Communications Magazine (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Charon: Modular Specification of Hybrid Systems, http://rtg.cis.upenn.edu/mobies/charon/
  12. 12.
    Garg, M.: Linear Prediction Algorithms. Indian Institute of technology, Bombay, India (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Henzinger, T. A.: The theory of hybrid automata. In: Proc. 11th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 1996), pp. 278–292 (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Environmental Research Institute, http://www.ucc.ie/en/ERI/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alie El-Din Mady
    • 1
  • Menouer Boubekeur
    • 1
  • Gregory Provan
    • 1
  1. 1.Cork Complex Systems Lab (CCSL), Computer Science DepartmentUniversity College Cork (UCC)CorkIreland

Personalised recommendations