Advertisement

Success Factors of e-Collaboration in Business Process Modeling

  • Peter Rittgen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6051)

Abstract

We identify the success factors of collaborative modeling of business processes by a qualitative analysis of the experiences of participants in group modeling sessions. The factors and their relations form a preliminary theoretical model of collaboration in modeling that extends existing models. The insights from this guided the improvement of a group modeling method and tool support which are in turn relevant outcomes of the design part of this study. We show in field experiments that the new method outperforms the conventional one.

Keywords

Business Process Success Factor Management Information System Business Process Model Collaborative Modeling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Briggs, R.O.: The Focus Theory of Group Productivity and its Application to the Design, Development, and Testing of Electronic Group Support Technology. Managemt Information Systems Department, PhD. University of Arizona, Tucson (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reinig, B.A., Shin, B.: The Dynamic Effects of Group Systems Support on Group Meetings. Journal of Management Information Systems 19, 303–325 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S.R.: Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies. Journal of Management Information Systems 17, 115–159 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S.R.: An assessment of group support systems experimental research: Methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems 15, 7–149 (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nunamaker, J.F.J., Briggs, R.O., Mittleman, D., Vogel, D.R.: Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: a discussion of lab and field findings. Journal of Management Information Systems 13, 163–207 (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dean, D., Orwig, R., Lee, J., Vogel, D.: Modeling with a group modeling tool: group support, model quality, and validation. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Information Systems: Collaboration Technology Organizational Systems and Technology, January 4-7, vol. 4, pp. 214–223. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dean, D.L., Lee, J.D., Orwig, R.E., Vogel, D.R.: Technological Support for Group Process Modeling. Journal of Management Information Systems 11, 43–63 (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dean, D.L., Orwig, R.E., Vogel, D.R.: Facilitation Methods for Collaborative Modeling Tools. Group Decision and Negotiation 9, 109–127 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mendling, J., Recker, J.: Extending the Discussion of Model Quality: Why Clarity and Completeness may not always be enough. In: 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2007), pp. 109–121 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siau, K., Tan, X.: Improving the quality of conceptual modeling using cognitive mapping techniques. Data & Knowledge Engineering 55, 343–365 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Osborn, A.F.: Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York (1963)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Diehl, M., Stroebe, W.: Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53, 497–509 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Diehl, M., Stroebe, W.: Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61, 392–403 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cottrell, N.B.: Social Facilitation. In: McClintock, C. (ed.) Experimental Social Psychology, pp. 185–236. Holt, Rinehart & Winston (1972)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Susskind, L.: Arguing, Bargaining and Getting Agreement. In: Rein, M., Goodin, R., Moran, M. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Public Poilicy. Oxford University Press, London (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28, 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    March, S.T., Smith, G.: Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. Decision Support Systems 15, 251–266 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rittgen, P.: Collaborative Modeling - A Design Science Approach. In: 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42), Waikoloa, Big Island, Hawaii, USA, January 5-8, p. 10. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rittgen, P.: Negotiating Models. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 561–573. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rittgen, P.: Collaborative Modeling of Business Processes - A Comparative Case Study. In: 24th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, March 9-12, pp. 225–230 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A.: Community-based ICT Development as a Multi-Player Game. In: What is an Organization? Materiality, Agency and Discourse. International Communication Association (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Frederiks, P.J.M., van der Weide, T.P.: Information Modeling: the process and the required competencies of its participants. Data & Knowledge Engineering 58, 4–20 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rouwette, E.A.J.A., Vennix, J.A.M., Mullekom, T.v.: Group model building effectiveness: a review of assessment studies. System Dynamics Review 18, 5–45 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Rittgen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Vlerick Leuven Gent Management SchoolGentBelgium
  2. 2.University of BoråsBoråsSweden

Personalised recommendations