Advertisement

Ahab’s Leg: Exploring the Issues of Communicating Semi-formal Requirements to the Final Users

  • Chiara Leonardi
  • Luca Sabatucci
  • Angelo Susi
  • Massimo Zancanaro
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6051)

Abstract

In this paper, we present our experience in using narrative scenarios as a tool to communicate and validate semi-formal requirements with the stakeholders in a large software project. The process of translating the semi-formal language of Tropos into the narrative form of scenarios is introduced and some unintended implications of this process are discussed. In particular, we define the notion of Ahab’s leg to describe the necessity to introduce new constraints or features in a description when moving to a different representational language. Starting from the lessons learned with this specific case study, we derive some general implications concerning the issue of requirement translation for validation tasks and we propose some methodological guidelines to address the Ahab’s leg dilemma.

Keywords

Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering User-Centred Design Persona Scenario 

References

  1. 1.
    Aoyama, M.: Persona-and-Scenario Based Requirements Engineering for Software Embedded in Digital Consumer Products. In: Proc. of 13th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2005), pp. 85–94 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bresciani, P., Giorgini, P., Giunchiglia, F., Mylopoulos, J., Perini, A.: Tropos: An Agent-Oriented Software Development Methodology. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 8(3), 203–236 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carroll, J.M., Rosson, M.B.: Getting around the task-artifact cycle: How to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Transaction on Information Systems 10, 181–212 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooper, A.: The Inmates are Running the Asylum. SAMS Publishing, USA (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooper, A., Reimann, R., Cronin, D.: About Face 3: The Essential of Interaction Design. Wiley Publishing, Chichester (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eco, U.: Kant and the platypus: essays on language and cognition. Harvest Books (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grudin, J., Pruitt, J.: Personas, participatory design and product development: an infrastructure for engagement. In: Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference 2002 (June 2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Katasonov, A., Sakkinen, M.: Requirements Quality Control: a Unifying Framework. Requirements Engineering Journal 11(1) (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu, L., Yu, E.: Designing Information Systems in Social Context: A Goal and Scenario Modelling Approach Information Systems 29(2), 187–203 (April 2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marasco, J.: The requirements translation challenge, http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10878_11-6128696.html
  12. 12.
    Morgan, D.: Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pohl, K., Haumer, P.: Modelling Contextual Information about Scenarios. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundations of Software Quality REFSQ 1997 (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Potts, C., Takahashi, K., Antòn, A.: Inquiry-Based Requirements Analysis. IEEE Software archive 11(2), 21–32 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rolland, C., Achour, C.B., Cauvet, C., Ralyté, J., Sutcliffe, A., Maiden, N., Jarke, M., Haumer, P., Pohl, K., Dubois, E., Heymans, P.: A proposal for a scenario classification framework. Requir. Eng. 3(1), 23–47 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Seyff, N., Maiden, N., Karlsen, K., Lockerbie, J., Grünbacher, P., Graf, F., Ncube, C.: Exploring how to use scenarios to discover requirements. Requir. Eng. 14(2), 91–111 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Susi, A., Perini, A., Giorgini, P., Mylopoulos, J.: The Tropos Metamodel and its Use. Informatica 29(4), 401–408 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Uchitel, S., Chatley, R., Kramer, J., Magee, J.: Goal and scenario validation: a fluent combination. Requir. Eng. 11, 123–137 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wolf, T.V., Rode, J.A., Sussman, J., Kellogg, W.A.: Dispelling “design” as the black art of CHI. In: Proceedings of CHI 2006 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chiara Leonardi
    • 1
  • Luca Sabatucci
    • 1
  • Angelo Susi
    • 1
  • Massimo Zancanaro
    • 1
  1. 1.Fondazione Bruno Kessler – IRST CITPovo, Trento

Personalised recommendations