Advertisement

Design and Verification of Instantiable Compliance Rule Graphs in Process-Aware Information Systems

  • Linh Thao Ly
  • Stefanie Rinderle-Ma
  • Peter Dadam
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6051)

Abstract

For enterprises it has become crucial to check compliance of their business processes with certain rules such as medical guidelines or financial regulations. When automating compliance checks on process models, existing approaches have mainly addressed process-specific compliance rules so far, i.e., rules that correspond to a particular process model. However, in practice, we will rather find process-independent compliance rules that are nevertheless to be checked over process models. Thus, in this paper, we present an approach that enables the instantiation and verification of process-independent compliance rules over process models using domain models. For this, we provide an intuitive visualization of compliance rules and compliance rule instances at user level and show how rules and instances can be formalized and verified at system level. The overall approach is validated by a pattern-based comparison to existing approaches and by means of a prototypical implementation.

Keywords

Business Process Domain Model Activity Type Formal Semantic Linear Temporal Logic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Sadiq, S., Governatori, G., Naimiri, K.: Modeling control objectives for business process compliance. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 149–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Awad, A., Decker, G., Weske, M.: Efficient compliance checking using BPMN-Q and temporal logic. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 326–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ly, L.T., Rinderle-Ma, S., Dadam, P.: Integration and verification of semantic constraints in adaptive process management systems. Data and Knowledge Engineering 64, 3–23 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Filipowska, A., Hepp, M., Kaczmarek, M., Markovic, I.: Organisational ontology framework for semantic business process management. In: BIS 2009. LNBIP, vol. 21, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar, A., Smith, B., Pisanelli, D., Gangemi, A., Stefanelli, M.: An ontological framework for the implementation of clinical guidelines in health care organizations. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 102, 95–107 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: Flexible support of team processes by adaptive workflow systems. Distributed and Parallel Databases 16, 91–116 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ly, L.T., Rinderle-Ma, S., Göser, K., Dadam, P.: On enabling integrated process compliance with semantic constraints in process management systems. Information Systems Frontiers (2009) (accepted for publication)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    van der Aalst, W., et al.: Prom 4.0: Comprehensive support for real process analysis. In: Kleijn, J., Yakovlev, A. (eds.) ICATPN 2007. LNCS, vol. 4546, pp. 484–494. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van der Aalst, W.: Verification of workflow nets. In: Int’l Conf. on Application and Theory of Petri Nets, pp. 407–426 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Managing process variants in the process lifecycle. In: Proc. ICEIS 2008, pp. 154–161 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pesic, M., Schonenberg, M., Sidorova, N., van der Aalst, W.: Constraint-based workflow models: Change made easy. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 77–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sadiq, S., Orlowska, M., Sadiq, W.: Specification and validation of process constraints for flexible workflows. Inf. Syst. 30, 349–378 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pesic, M.: Constraint-Based Workflow Management Systems: Shifting Control to Users. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Awad, A., Weske, M.: Visualization of compliance violation in business process models. In: Proc. BPI 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu, J., Manh, T.P., Hand, J., Jin, Y.: Pattern-based property specification and verification for service composition. CeCSES Report SUT. CeCSES-TR010, Swinburne University of Technology (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dwyer, M.B., Avrunin, G.S., Corbett, J.C.: Patterns in property specifications for finite-state verification. In: Proc. ICSE 1999, pp. 411–420 (1999)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghose, A., Koliadis, G.: Auditing business process compliance. In: Krämer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 169–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu, Y., Müller, S., Xu, K.: A static compliance-checking framework for business process models. IBM Systems Journal 46, 335–361 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Governatori, G., Hoffmann, J., Sadiq, S., Weber, I.: Detecting regulatory compliance for business process models through semantic annotations. In: Proc. BPD 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lu, R., Sadiq, S., Governatori, G.: Compliance aware process design. In: ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Benatallah, B., Paik, H.-Y. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2007. LNCS, vol. 4928, pp. 120–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    van der Aalst, W., Pesic, M.: DecSerFlow: Towards a truly declarative service flow language. In: Bravetti, M., Núñez, M., Zavattaro, G. (eds.) WS-FM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4184, pp. 1–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Namiri, K., Stojanovic, N.: Pattern-based design and validation of business process compliance. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 59–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linh Thao Ly
    • 1
  • Stefanie Rinderle-Ma
    • 2
  • Peter Dadam
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Databases and Information SystemsUlm UniversityGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Computer ScienceUniversity of ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations