Advertisement

Dealing with Matching Variability of Semantic Web Data Using Contexts

  • Silvana Castano
  • Alfio Ferrara
  • Stefano Montanelli
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6051)

Abstract

Goal of this paper is to propose a reference modeling framework to explicitly identify and formalize the different levels of variability that can arise along all the involved dimensions of a matching execution. The proposed framework is based on the notion of knowledge chunk, context, and mapping to abstract the variability levels and related operations along the source-dataset, the matching-dataset, and the mapping-set dimensions, respectively. An application of the proposed framework with instantiation in the HMatch 2.0 systems is illustrated.

Keywords

Variability modeling matching semantic web knowledge management 

References

  1. 1.
    Nikolov, A., Uren, V., Motta, E., Roeck, A.D.: Handling Instance Coreferencing in the KnoFuss Architecture. In: Proc. of the 1st ESWC Int. Workshop on Identity and Reference on the Semantic Web (IRSW 2008), Tenerife, Spain (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rahm, E., Bernstein, P.A.: A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. The VLDB Journal 10(4), 334–350 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Isaac, A., van der Meij, L., Schlobach, S., Wang, S.: An Empirical Study of Instance-Based Ontology Matching. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.-S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.-I., Nixon, L.J.B., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 253–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bleiholder, J., Naumann, F.: Data Fusion. ACM Computing Surveys 41(1) (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ten Challenges for Ontology Matching. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2008, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5332, pp. 1164–1182. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jean-Mary, Y.R., Shironoshita, E.P., Kabuka, M.R.: Ontology Matching with Semantic Verification. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 7(3), 235–251 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, J., Tang, J., Li, Y., Luo, Q.: RiMOM: A Dynamic Multistrategy Ontology Alignment Framework. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 21(8), 1218–1232 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nagy, M., Vargas-Vera, M., Motta, E.: Managing Conflicting Beliefs with Fuzzy Trust on the Semantic Web. In: Gelbukh, A., Morales, E.F. (eds.) MICAI 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5317, pp. 827–837. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Doshi, P., Thomas, C.: Inexact Matching of Ontology Graphs Using Expectation-Maximization. In: Proc. of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2006), Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 1277–1282 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cruz, I.F., Antonelli, F.P., Stroe, C.: AgreementMaker: Efficient Matching for Large Real-World Schemas and Ontologies. In: Proc. of the 35th Int. Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB 2009), Lyon, France, pp. 1586–1589 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zimmermann, A., Krötzschand, M., Euzenat, J., Hitzler, P.: Formalizing Ontology Alignment and its Operations with Category Theory. In: Proc. of the 2006 Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 277–288 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Euzenat, J.: Algebras of Ontology Alignment Relations. In: Sheth, A.P., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 387–402. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gal, A., Martinez, M.V., Simari, G.I., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Aggregate Query Answering under Uncertain Schema Mappings. In: Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2009), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 940–951 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meilicke, C., Völker, J., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Learning Disjointness for Debugging Mappings between Lightweight Ontologies. In: Gangemi, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) EKAW 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5268, pp. 93–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Lorusso, D., Näth, T.H., Möller, R.: Mapping Validation by Probabilistic Reasoning. In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 170–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S.: The iCoord Knowledge Model for P2P Semantic Coordination. In: Proc. of the 6th Conference of the Italian Chapter of AIS, Costa Smeralda (Nu), Italy (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lapouchnian, A., Mylopoulos, J.: Modeling Domain Variability in Requirements Engineering with Contexts. In: Proc. of the 28th Int. Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER 2009), Gramado, Brazil. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: A Guided Tour. In: Proc. of the 5th IEEE Int. Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE 2001), Washington, DC, USA (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S.: Matching Ontologies in Open Networked Systems: Techniques and Applications. Journal on Data Semantics, JoDS V (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvana Castano
    • 1
  • Alfio Ferrara
    • 1
  • Stefano Montanelli
    • 1
  1. 1.Università degli Studi di Milano, DICoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations