Abstract
Identifying essential proteins is important for understanding the minimal requirements for cellular survival and development. Fast growth in the amount of available protein-protein interactions has produced unprecedented opportunities for detecting protein essentiality on network level. A series of centrality measures have been proposed to discover essential proteins based on network topology. However, most of them treat all interactions equally and are sensitive to false positives. In this paper, six standard centrality measures are redefined to be used in weighted network. A new method for weighing protein-protein interactions is proposed based on the combination of logistic regression-based model and function similarity. The experimental results on yeast network show that the weighting method can improve the performance of centrality measures considerably. More essential proteins are discovered by the weighted centrality measures than by the original centrality measures used in unweighted network. Even about 20% improvements are obtained from closeness centrality and subgraph centrality.
This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.60773111, the Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China No. 20090162120073, the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grants CCF-0514750, CCF-0646102, and CNS-0831634, and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University No. IRT0661.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Uetz, P., et al.: A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623–627 (2000)
Barabasi, A.L., Oltvai, Z.N.: Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat. Res. 5, 101–114 (2004)
Yook, S., Oltvai, Z., Barabasi, A.: Functional and topological characterization of protein interaction networks. Proteomics 4, 928–942 (2004)
Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)
Rives, A.W., Galitski, T.: Modular organization of cellular networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100, 1128–1133 (2003)
Gavin, A.C., et al.: Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440(7084), 631–636 (2006)
Maslov, S., Sneppen, K.: Specificity and stability in topology of protein networks. Science 296, 910–913 (2002)
Winzeler, E.A., Shoemaker, D.D., Astromoff, A., Liang, H., Anderson, K., et al.: Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285, 901–906 (1999)
Kamath, R.S., Fraser, A.G., Dong, Y., Poulin, G., Durbin, R., et al.: Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 421, 231–237 (2003)
Yu, H., Greenbaum, D., Lu, H.X., Zhu, Z., Gerstein, M.: Genomic analysis of essentiality within protein networks. Trends Genet. 20, 227–231 (2004)
Hahn, M. W., Kern, A.: Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22(4), 803–806 (2005)
Wuchty, S.: Interaction and domain networks of yeast. Proteomics 2, 1715–1723 (2002)
Jeong, H., Mason, S., Barabási, A., Oltvai, Z.: Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411, 41–42 (2001)
Batada, N.N., Hurst, L.D., Tyers, M.: Evolutionary and physiological importance of hub proteins. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2(7), e88 (2006) doi:10.1371/ journal.pcbi.0020088
Coulomb, S., Bauer, M., Bernard, D., Marsolier-Kergoat, M.: Gene essentiality and the topology of protein interaction networks. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 1721–1725 (2005)
He, X.L., Zhang, J.Z.: Why Do Hubs Tend to Be Essential in Protein Networks? PLoS Genetics 2(6), 826–834 (2006)
Zotenko, E., Mestre, J., O’Leary, D.P., Przytycka, T.M.: Why Do Hubs in the Yeast Protein Interaction Network Tend To Be Essential: Reexamining the Connection between the Network Topology and Essentiality. PLoS Computational Biology 4(8), 1–16 (2008)
Vallabhajosyula, R., Chakravarti, D., Lutfeali, S., Ray, A., Raval, A.: Identifying Hubs in Protein Interaction Networks. Plos One 4(4), 1–10 (2009)
Ernesto, E.: Virtual identification of essential proteins within the protein interaction network of yeast (2005) http://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio.MN/0505007
Narayanan, S.: The betweenness centrality of biological networks. Master of Science in Computer Science. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (September 16, 2005)
Joy, M., et al.: High-betweenness proteins in the yeast protein interaction network. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 2, 96–103 (2005)
Wuchty, S., Stadler, P.: Centers of complex networks. Journal of Theoretical Biology 223, 45–53 (2003)
Estrada, E., RodrÃguez-Velázquez, J.A.: Subgraph centrality in complex networks. Phys. Rev. E. 71(5) (2005)
Bonacich, P.F.: Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology 92(5), 1170–1182 (1987)
Stevenson, K., Zelen, M.: Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples. Social Networks 11, 1–37 (1989)
Gerdes, S., Edwards, R., Kubal, M., Fonstein, M., Stevens, R., Osterman, A.: Essential genes on metabolic maps. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17, 448–456 (2006)
Becker, S.A., Palsson, B.O.: Genome-scale reconstruction of the metabolic network in Staphylococcus aureus N315: an initial draft to the two-dimensional annotation. BMC Microbiol. 5, 8 (2005)
Lamichhane, G., Zignol, M., Blades, N.J., Geiman, D.E., Dougherty, A., Grosset, J., Broman, K.W., Bishai, W.R.: A postgenomic method for predicting essential genes at subsaturation levels of mutagenesis: application to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PNAS 100(12), 7213–7218 (2003)
von Mering, C., et al.: Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417(6887), 399–403 (2002)
Brohee, S., van Helden, J.: Evaluation of clustering algorithms for protein-protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics, 7–488 (2006)
Jacob, R., Koschtzki, D., Lehmann, K.A., Peeters, L., Tenfelde-Podehl, D.: Algorithms for Centrality Indices. In: Brandes, U., Erlebach, T. (eds.) Network Analysis. LNCS, vol. 3418, pp. 62–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Mason, O., Verwoerd, M.: Graph theory and networks in biology. IET Systems Biology 1(2), 89–119 (2006)
Mewes, H.W., Amid, C., Arnold, R., et al.: MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 32, D41–D44 (2004)
Sharan, R., et al.: Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species. PNAS 102(6), 1974–1979 (2005)
Shlomi, T., Segal, D., Ruppin, E., Sharan, R.: Qpath: a method for querying pathways in a protein-protein interaction network. BMC Bioinformatics, 7–199 (2006)
Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in taxonomy. In: Proc. the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 448–453 (1995)
Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: Proc.of 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 296–304 (1998)
Lei, Z., Dai, Y.: Assessing protein similarity with Gene Ontology and its use in subnuclear localization prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 491 (2006)
Issel-Tarver, L., Christie, K.R., Dolinski, K., et al.: Saccharomyces Genome Database. Methods Enzymol. 350, 329–346 (2002)
Holman, A.G., Davis, P., Foster, J.M., et al.: Computational prediction of essential genes in an unculturable endosymbiotic bacterium, Wolbachia of Brugia malayi. BMC Microbiology 9, 243 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, M., Wang, J., Wang, H., Pan, Y. (2010). Essential Proteins Discovery from Weighted Protein Interaction Networks. In: Borodovsky, M., Gogarten, J.P., Przytycka, T.M., Rajasekaran, S. (eds) Bioinformatics Research and Applications. ISBRA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6053. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13078-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13078-6_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13077-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13078-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)