Understanding the Realization of Organizations

  • Joop de Jong
  • Jan L. G. Dietz
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 49)

Abstract

An organization can be understood as a social system, i.e. a system whose elements are social individuals or actors. The actors operate in an environment of customers, suppliers, partners and others which share a part of the organization’s world. The effects of the acts of all of these actors can be understood as state changes of the organization’s world. All information that is needed by the actors consists in either the facts that constitute the world’s states or in information that is derived from these facts. In DEMO (Design and Engineering Methodology for Organizations) an organization is conceived as the layered nesting of three aspect organizations: the B-organization (from Business), the I-organization (from Intelligence) and the D-organizations (from Document). Whereas B-actors perform business acts, I-actors remember and derive information concerning the business, and D-actors store, transport and retrieve documents that contain this information. The design of the integration between the B-, the I-, and the D-organization is called the realization of the organization. This paper presents and discusses how the realization of organizations can be understood thoroughly, as well as how the I-organization can be derived from the B-organization, and the D-organization from the I-organization.

Keywords

enterprise engineering enterprise ontology information management DEMO 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dietz, J.L.G.: Enterprise Ontology – theory and methodology. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dietz, J.L.G.: The deep structure of business processes. Communications of the ACM 49(5), 59–64 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dietz, J.L.G.: Deriving Use Cases from Business Process Models. In: Song, I.-Y., Liddle, S.W., Ling, T.-W., Scheuermann, P. (eds.) ER 2003. LNCS, vol. 2813, pp. 131–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maij, E., et al.: Use cases and DEMO: aligning functional features of ICT-infrastructure to business processes. International Journal of Medical Informatics 65, 179–191 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shishkov, B., Dietz, J.L.G.: Deriving use cases from business processes: the advantages of DEMO. In: The Fifth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Angers, France (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mallens, P.J.M., Dietz, J.L.G., Hommes, B.J.: The Value of Business Process Modelling with DEMO prior to Information Systems Modeling with UML. In: EMMSAD 2001: Proceedings, 6th CAISE/IFIP8.1 International Workshop on Evaluation of Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design (2001); InterlakenGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mulder, J.B.F.: Rapid Enterprise Design, Technical University Delft, Delft (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dietz, J.L.G.: Architecture, building strategy into design. In: NAF working group Extensible Architecture Framework (xAF) (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Op ’t Land, M., Applying Architecture and Ontology to the Splitting and Allying of Enterprises. Delft University of Technology, Delft (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dietz, J.L.G.: DEMO: Towards a discipline of organisation engineering. European Journal of Operational Research 128, 351–363 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stamper, R.K.: Information in Business and Administrative Systems. Wiley, New York (1973)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, K.: Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stamper, R.K., et al.: Understanding the Roles of Signs and Norms in Organisations. Journal of Behaviour and Information Technology 19(1), 15–27 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bunge, M.A.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy, A World of Systems, vol. 4. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht (1979)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joop de Jong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jan L. G. Dietz
    • 1
  1. 1.Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.MpriseVeenendaalThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations