Towards a G.O.D. Organization for Organizational Self-Awareness

  • David Aveiro
  • António Rito Silva
  • José Tribolet
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 49)

Abstract

In this paper we draw on concepts from the Design and Engineering Methodology for Organizations, and also from its theoretical foundations, to discuss our notions of Organizational Self-Awareness and ontological meta model. These are deemed as central notions to understand and present, in a clear and precise manner, solutions for our main research purpose: finding concepts and methods to better handle organizational change caused by unexpected exceptions causing dysfunction in an organization’s activity. Based on ontological notions like state base of a world and the ontological parallelogram, we arrive at precise definitions of what we call organizational self and its awareness. These then serve to put in perspective our proposal for the G.O.D Organization, considered to exist in every organization and being responsible for the Generation, Operationalization and Discontinuation of organization artifacts – e.g., actor role pizza deliverer – reflecting change of the organizational self. The main contribution of this paper is a discussion and clarification of how one can perceive an organization in a precise and thorough way, as to be able to keep a fact record of its relevant changes and, as a consequence, have a dynamic and “living model” of the organization.

Keywords

organizational engineering organizational self-awareness organizational change model meta-model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Applegate, L.M., McFarlan, F.W., McKenney, J.L.: Corporate information systems management: text and cases. Irwin/McGrawHill (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dietz, J.L.G.: Enterprise ontology: theory and methodology. Springer, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Christensen, W.D., Bickhard, M.H.: The process dynamics of normative function. The Monist 85, 3–29 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holland, J.H.: Hidden order: how adaptation builds complexity. Basic Books, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bickhard, M.H.: Error dynamics: the dynamic emergence of error avoidance and error vicariants. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 13, 199–209 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown, S.L., Eisenhardt, K.M.: Competing on the edge: strategy as structured chaos. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saastamoinen, H., White, G.M.: On handling exceptions. In: Proceedings of conference on Organizational computing systems, pp. 302–310. ACM, New York (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tribolet, J.: Organizações, pessoas, processos e conhecimento: da reificação do ser humano como componente do conhecimento à “consciência de si” organizacional (organizations, people, processes and knowledge: from the reification of the human being as components of knowledge to the knowledge of organizational self). Sistemas de informação organizacionais. Sílabo Editora, Lisbon, Portugal (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Magalhães, R., Zacarias, M., Tribolet, J.: Making sense of enterprise architectures as tools of organizational self-awareness (OSA). In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR 2007), June 2007, vol. 6, pp. 61–70 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zacarias, M., Magalhães, R., Caetano, A., Pinto, H.S., Tribolet, J.: Towards organizational self-awareness: an initial architecture and ontology. In: Handbook of ontologies for business interaction, pp. 101–121. Information Science Reference (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Magalhães, R., Silva, A.R.: Organizational design and engineering (ode) - ode white paper - Version 1 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mourão, H.: Supporting effective unexpected exceptions handling in workflow management systems within organizational contexts. Science Faculty of Lisbon University (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Casati, F., Pozzi, G.: Modeling exceptional behaviors in commercial workflow management systems. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CoopIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, pp. 127–138 (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Axelrod, R., Cohen, M.D.: Harnessing complexity: organizational implications of a scientific frontier. Basic Books, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dietz, J.L.G., Albani, A.: Basic notions regarding business processes and supporting information systems. Requirements Engineering 10, 175–183 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Op’ t Land, M.: Applying architecture and ontology to the splitting and allying of enterprises. TU Delft (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dietz, J.L.G.: Architecture building strategy into design. Academic Service - Sdu Uitgevers bv. (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dietz, J.L.G.: On the nature of business rules. In: Advances in Enterprise Engineering I, pp. 1–15 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bunge, M.A.: Treatise on basic philosophy, a world of systems, vol. 4. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrechtz (1979)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dietz, J.L.G.: Demo-3 models and representations (2009), http://www.demo.nl
  21. 21.
    Dumay, M., Dietz, J.L.G., Mulder, H.: Evaluation of demo and the language/action perspective after 10 years of experience. In: Proceedings of LAP 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dietz, J.L.G.: A world ontology specification language. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM-WS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3762, pp. 688–699. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dietz, J.L.G.: Demo meta model specification (forthcoming, 2009), http://www.demo.nl

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Aveiro
    • 1
    • 2
  • António Rito Silva
    • 2
    • 3
  • José Tribolet
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Exact Sciences and Engineering CentreUniversity of MadeiraFunchalPortugal
  2. 2.Center for Organizational Design and Engineering, INESC-INOVLisboaPortugal
  3. 3.Department of Information Systems and Computer ScienceInstituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon 

Personalised recommendations