This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A (2002) The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function. Neurourol Urodyn 21: 167–178
Bentzon DN, Graugaard-Jensen C, Borre M (2009) Urethral pressure profile 6 months after radical prostatectomy may be diagnostic of sphincteric incontinence: Preliminary data after 12 months’ follow-up. Scand J Urol Nephrol 43(2):114–8
Griffiths DJ, Höfner K, van Mastrigt R, Rollema HJ, Spangberg A, Gleason DM (1997) Standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: pressure- flow studies of voiding, urethral resistance and urethral obstruction. Neurourol Urodyn 16:1–18
Lose G, Griffiths DJ, Hosker G, Kulseng-Hansen S, Peruchinin D, Schäfer W, Thind P, Versi E (2002) Standardisation of urethral pressure measurement: Report of the sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:258–260
Peschers UM, Jundt K, Dimpfl T (2000) Differences between cough and valsalva leak point pressure in stress incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn 19: 677–681
Phillip R, Lentsch P, Hesse U, Schüssler B (1987) Stressprofil-Artefakt oder physiologisches Phänomen? Geburtsh und Frauenheilk 47: 165
Rowan D, James DE, Kramer AEJL, Sterling AM, Suhel PF (1987) Urodynamic equipment: Technical aspects. J Med Eng Tech 11:57–64
Schäfer W (2001) Some biomechanical aspects of continence function. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 207: 44–60
Schäfer W (2011) Re: Comparison of Air-Charged and Water-Filled Urodynamic Pressure Measurement Catheters by M.A. Cooper, P.C. Fletter, P.J. Zaszczurynski, and M.S. Damaser. Neurourol Urodyn Jun 9. doi: 10.1002/nau.21113
Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao Limin, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spangberg A, Sterling AM, Zinner NR, van Kerrebroeck PH (2002) Good urodynamic practice: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry and pressure-flow studies. Report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21: 261–274
Schüssler B, Hesse U, Lentsch P (1987) Artefakte bei der Aufzeichnung des Stressprofils und deren klinische Bedeutung. Urologe A 26: 112
Waalwijk E van, Anders K, Khullar V, Kulseng-Hansen S, Pesce F, Robertson A, Rosario D, Schäfer W (2000) Standardisation of ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: Report of the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 19:113–25
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schäfer, W., Kirschner-Hermanns, R. (2012). Grundlagen urodynamischer Messmethoden. In: Schultz-Lampel, D., Goepel, M., Haferkamp, A. (eds) Urodynamik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13016-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13016-8_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13015-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13016-8
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)