Skip to main content

A Practical and Secure Coercion-Resistant Scheme for Internet Voting

(Extended Abstract)

  • Chapter
Towards Trustworthy Elections

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 6000))

Abstract

Juels, Catalano, and Jakobsson (JCJ) proposed at WPES 2005 the first voting scheme that considers real-world threats and that is more realistic for Internet elections. Their scheme, though, has a quadratic work factor and thereby is not efficient for large scale elections. Based on the work of JCJ, Smith proposed an efficient scheme that has a linear work factor. In this paper we first show that Smith’s scheme is insecure. Then we present a new coercion-resistant election scheme with a linear work factor that overcomes the flaw of Smith’s proposal. Our solution is based on the group signature scheme of Camenisch and Lysyanskaya (Crypto 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boneh, D.: The decision diffie-hellman problem. In: Buhler, J.P. (ed.) ANTS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1423, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Boneh, D., Boyen, X., Shacham, H.: Short group signatures. In: Franklin [11], pp. 41–55

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brickell, E.F. (ed.): CRYPTO 1992. LNCS, vol. 740. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cachin, C., Kursawe, K., Shoup, V.: Random oracles in constantipole: practical asynchronous byzantine agreement using cryptography (extended abstract). In: Neiger, G. (ed.) PODC, pp. 123–132. ACM, New York (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Camenisch, J., Lysyanskaya, A.: Signature schemes and anonymous credentials from bilinear maps. In: Franklin [11], pp. 56–72

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chaum, D.: Untraceable electronic mail, return addresses and digital pseudonyms. Communications of the ACM 24(2), 84–88 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaum, D., Pedersen, T.P.: Wallet databases with observers. In: Brickell [3], pp. 89–105

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clarkson, M.R., Chong, S., Myers, A.C.: Civitas: A secure remote voting system. Technical Report TR2007-2081, Cornell University (May 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cramer, R., Gennaro, R., Schoenmakers, B.: A secure and optimally efficient multi-authority election scheme. In: Fumy, W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1233, pp. 103–118. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fiat, A., Shamir, A.: How to prove yourself: Practical solutions to identification and signature problems. In: Odlyzko, A.M. (ed.) CRYPTO 1986. LNCS, vol. 263, pp. 186–194. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Franklin, M. (ed.): CRYPTO 2004. LNCS, vol. 3152. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. El Gamal, T.: A public key cryptosystem and a signature scheme based on discrete logarithms. In: Blakely, G.R., Chaum, D. (eds.) CRYPTO 1984. LNCS, vol. 196, pp. 10–18. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Gennaro, R., Jarecki, S., Krawczyk, H., Rabin, T.: Secure distributed key generation for discrete-log based cryptosystems. In: Stern [25], pp. 295–310

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hirt, M., Sako, K.: Efficient receipt-free voting based on homomorphic encryption. In: Preneel, B. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2000. LNCS, vol. 1807, pp. 539–556. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Jakobsson, M., Juels, A.: Mix and match: Secure function evaluation via ciphertexts. In: Okamoto, T. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2000. LNCS, vol. 1976, pp. 162–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Jakobsson, M., Sako, K., Impagliazzo, R.: Designated verifier proofs and their applications. In: Maurer, U.M. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1996. LNCS, vol. 1070, pp. 143–154. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Juels, A., Catalano, D., Jakobsson, M.: Coercion-resistant electronic elections. In: Atluri, V., De Capitani di Vimercati, S., Dingledine, R. (eds.) WPES, pp. 61–70. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lim, C.H., Lee, P.J.: A key recovery attack on discrete log-based schemes using a prime order subgroup. In: Kaliski Jr., B.S. (ed.) CRYPTO 1997. LNCS, vol. 1294, pp. 249–263. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Andrew Neff, C.: A verifiable secret shuffle and its application to e-voting. In: ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 116–125 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Okamoto, T.: Provably secure and practical identification schemes and corresponding signature schemes. In: Brickell [3], pp. 31–53

    Google Scholar 

  21. Paillier, P.: Public-key cryptosystems based on composite degree residuosity classes. In: Stern [25], pp. 223–238

    Google Scholar 

  22. Park, C., Itoh, K., Kurosawa, K.: Efficient anonymous channel and all/Nothing election scheme. In: Helleseth, T. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1993. LNCS, vol. 765, pp. 248–259. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schnorr, C.-P.: Efficient signature generation by smart cards. J. Cryptology 4(3), 161–174 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith, W.D.: New cryptographic voting scheme with best-known theoretical properties. In: Workshop on Frontiers in Electronic Elections (FEE 2005), Milan, Italy (September 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stern, J. (ed.): EUROCRYPT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1592. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Weber, S.G., Araújo, R., Buchmann, J.: On coercion-resistant electronic elections with linear work. In: 2nd Workshop on Dependability and Security in e-Government (DeSeGov 2007) at 2nd Int. Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES 2007), pp. 908–916. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Araújo, R., Foulle, S., Traoré, J. (2010). A Practical and Secure Coercion-Resistant Scheme for Internet Voting . In: Chaum, D., et al. Towards Trustworthy Elections. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6000. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12980-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12980-3_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12979-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12980-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics