Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Planung einer Handlung

  • Chapter
Handlungspsychologie

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

  • 5821 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

  • Woher wissen wir, dass Handlungen im Vorhinein geplant werden?

  • Woraus bestehen Handlungspläne? Welches sind ihre Elemente?

  • Werden alle Aspekte von Handlungen im Voraus geplant?

  • Wie werden die Elemente eines Handlungsplans zusammengefügt?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur

  • Rosenbaum, D. A. & Krist, H. (1993). Vorbereitung von Bewegungen. In H. Heuer & S. W. Keele (Hrsg.), Psychomotorik, Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Serie Kognition, Bd. 3(S. 3–85). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

Literatur

  • Abeles M. (1991). Corticonics: Neural circuits of the cerebral cortex. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bairstow, P. J. (1987). Analysis of hand movement to moving targets. Human Movement Science, 6, 205–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bard, C., Paillard, J., Lajoie, Y., Fleury, M., Teasdale, N. et al. (1992). Role of the afferent information in the timing of motor commands: A comparative study with a deafferent patient. Neuropsychologia, 30, 201–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, S. (2004). Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 3–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. & Kelso, J. A. S. (1980). Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 475– 495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, F. M. & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a »memory drum« theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 448– 458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. (1981). Fast aiming movements with the left and right hand: Evidence for two-process theories of motor control. Psychological Research, 43, 81–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. (1982). Binary choice reaction time as a criterion of motor equivalence. Acta Psychologica, 50, 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G. & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 188– 196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (eds.), Attention and performance, vol. IX(pp. 153–169). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. (1984). The contribution of open-loop and closed-loop control modes in prehension movements. In S. Kornblum & J. Requin (eds.), Preparatory states and processes: Proceedings of the franco-american conference(pp. 323–337). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. & Biguer, B. (1982). Visuomotor mechanisms in reaching within extra personal space. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale & R. J. W. Mansfield (eds.), Analysis of visual behavior(pp. 387–409). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S. W. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klapp , S. T. (1975). Feedback versus motor programming in the control of aimed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 104, 147– 153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva-Feige, R., Feige, B., Makeig, S., Ross, B. & Elbert, T. (1993). Oscillatory brain activity during a motor task. NeuroReport, 4, 1291–1294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lashley, K. S. (1917). The accuracy of movement in the absence of excitation from the moving organ. American Journal of Physiology, 43, 169–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. D., Elliott, D. & Carnahan, H. (1987). The preparation of actions and parameters of action: A fixed or variable process? Acta Psychologica, 66, 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lépine, D., Glencross, D. & Requin, J. (1989). Some experimental evidence for and against a parametric conception of movement programming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E. & Gordon, P. C. (1985). Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, A. D. & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motley, M. T., Camden, C. T. & Baars, B. J. (1982). Covert formulation and editing of anomalies in speech production: Evidence from experimentally elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 578– 594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, V. N. & Fetz, E. E. (1992). Coherent 25- to 35-Hz oscillations in the sensorimotor cortex of awake behaving monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 89, 5670–5674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, V. N. & Fetz, E. E. (1996). Oscillatory activity in sensorimotor cortex of awake monkeys: Synchronization of local field potentials and relation to behavior. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 3949–3967.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müsseler, J. & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfurtscheller, G., Flotzinger, D. & Neuper, C. (1994). Differentiation between finger, toe and tongue movement in man based on 40 Hz EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 90, 456–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prablanc, C. & Jeannerod, M. (1975). Corrective saccades: Dependence on retinal reafferent signals. Vision Research, 15, 465–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prablanc, C. & Pélisson, D. (1990). Gaze saccade orienting and hand pointing are locked to their goal by quick internal loops. In M. Jeannerod (ed.), Attention and performance, vol. XIII(pp. 653–676). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. T. & Sherwood, D. E. (1983). Time requirements of changes in program and parameter variables in rapid ongoing movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 163– 178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A. & Kornblum, S. (1982). A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses. Acta Psychologica, 51, 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Marchak, F., Barnes, H. J., Vaughan, J., Slotta, J. et al. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In M. Jeannerod (ed.), Attention and performance, vol. XIII(pp. 321–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Weber, R. J., Hazelett, W. M. & Hindorff, V. (1986). The parameter remapping effect in human performance: Evidence from tongue twisters and finger fumblers. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 710–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. (1988). Investigations on the basis of the generalized motor programme hypothesis. In O. G. Meijer & K. Roth (eds.), The motor-action controversy(pp. 261–288). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, J. C., Traub, M. M., Day, B. L., Obeso, J. A., Thomas, P. K. et al. (1982). Manual motor performance in a deafferented man. Brain, 105, 515–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. & Norman, D. A. (1982). Simulating a skilled typist: A study of skilled cognitive-motor performance. Cognitive Science, 6, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanes, J. N. & Donoghue, J. P. (1993). Oscillations in local field potentials of the primate motor cortex during voluntary movement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 90, 4470–4474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelmach, G. E. & Teulings H. (1983). Response characteristics of prepared and restructured handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L. & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning(pp. 117–152). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoet, G. & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625– 1640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taub, E. & Berman, A. J. (1968). Movement and learning in the absence of sensory feedback. In S. J. Freedman (ed.), The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior(pp. 173– 192). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1927). The law of effect. American Journal of Psychology, 39, 212–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. M. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viviani, P. & Terzuolo, C. (1980). Space-time invariance in learned motor skills. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior(pp. 525–533). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Von der Malsburg, C. (1981). The correlation theory of brain function. Internal report. Göttingen: Max-Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review; Monograph Supplements, 3, 1–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaniv, I., Meyer, D. E., Gordon, P. C., Huff, C. A. & Sevald, C. A. (1990). Vowel similarity, connectionist models, and syllable structure in motor programming of speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelaznik, H. N. & Hahn, R. (1985). Reaction time methods in the study of motor programming: The precuing of hand, digit and duration. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 190–218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333, AK Leiden, Niederlande

    Professor Dr. Bernhard Hommel

  2. Institut für Psychologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Rudower Chaussee 18, 12489, Berlin

    Dr. Dieter Nattkemper

Authors
  1. Professor Dr. Bernhard Hommel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Dieter Nattkemper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hommel, B., Nattkemper, D. (2011). Planung einer Handlung. In: Handlungspsychologie. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12858-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation