Skip to main content

Abstract

In order to manage the conceptual representation of European law we have proposed the Legal Taxonomy Syllabus (LTS) and the related methodology. In this paper we consider further issues that emerged during the testing and use of the LTS, and how we took them into account in the new release of the system. In particular, we address the problem of representing interpretation of terms besides the definitions occurring in the directives, the problem of normative change, and the process of planning legal reforms of European law. We show how to include into the Legal Taxonomy Syllabus the Acquis Principles - which have been sketched by scholars in European Private Law from the so-called Acquis communautaire -, how to take the temporal dimension into account in ontologies, and how to apply natural language processing techniques to the legal texts being annotated in the LTS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Després, S., Szulman, S.: Merging of legal micro-ontologies from european directives. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Law (February 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Casanovas, P., Casellas, N., Tempich, C., Vrandecic, D., Benjamins, R.: OPJK modeling methodology. In: Proceedings of the ICAIL Workshop: LOAIT 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giguet, E., Luquet, P.: Multilingual lexical database generation from parallel texts in 20 european languages with endogenous resources. In: Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 Main Conference Poster Sessions, Sydney, Australia, pp. 271–278, Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tiscornia, D.: The Lois Project: Lexical Ontologies for Legal Information. In: Proceedings of the V Legislative XML Workshop. European Press Academic Publishing (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vossen, P., Peters, W., Gonzalo, J.: Towards a universal index of meaning. In: Proc. ACL 1999 Siglex Workshop (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boer, A., van Engers, T., Winkels, R.: Using ontologies for comparing and harmonizing legislation. In: ICAIL, pp. 60–69 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rossi, P., Vogel, C.: Terms and concepts; towards a syllabus for european private law. European Review of Private Law (ERPL) 12(2), 293–300 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ajani, G., Boella, G., Lesmo, L., Mazzei, A., Rossi, P.: Multilingual conceptual dictionaries based on ontologies. In: Proc. of V Legislative XML Workshop, Florence, pp. 1–14. European Press Academic Publishing (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ajani, G., Boella, G., Lesmo, L., Martin, M., Mazzei, A., Rossi, P.: A development tool for multilingual ontology-based conceptual dictionaries. In: Proc. of 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2006, Genoa, pp. 1–6 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ajani, G., Boella, G., Lesmo, L., Mazzei, A., Rossi, P.: Multilingual Ontological Analysis of European Directives. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Companion Volume Proceedings of the Demo and Poster Sessions, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 21–24. Association for Computational Linguistics (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ajani, G., Boella, G., Lesmo, L., Mazzei, A., Rossi, P.: Terminological and ontological analysis of european directives: multilinguism in law. In: 11th International Conference on Arificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL), pp. 43–48 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Palmirani, M., Brighi, R.: Time model for managing the dynamic of normative system. Electronic Government, 207–218 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cadoli, M., Donini, F.M.: A Survey on Knowledge Compilation. AI Communications 10(3-4), 137–150 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Klein, M.: Combining and relating ontologies: an analysis of problems and solutions. In: Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing, IJCAI 2001, Seattle, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. The Gene Ontology Consortium: Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics 25, 25–29 (2000), http://genetics.nature.com

  16. Cherubini, M., Giardiello, G., Marchi, S., Montemagni, S., Spinosa, P., Venturi, G.: NLP-based metadata annotation of textual amendments. In: Proc. of Workshop on Legislative XML 2008, JURIX 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brighi, R., Lesmo, L., Mazzei, A., Palmirani, M., Radicioni, D.: Towards Semantic Interpretation of Legal Modifications through Deep Syntactic Analysis. In: Jurix 2008: The 21st Annual Conference. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. European Commission: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council - A More Coherent European Contract Law - An Action Plan. COM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. European Commission: European Contract Law and the revision of the acquis: the way forward. Communication from the Commission COM (2004) (651 final) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ajani, G., Schulte-Nölke, H.: The Action Plan on a More Coherent European Contract Law: Response on Behalf of the Acquis Group (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schulze, R.: European Private Law and Existing EC Law. European Review of Private Law, ERPL (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Giunchiglia, F., Zaihrayeu, I.: Lightweight Ontologies. Technical Report DIT-07-071, University of Trento, Department of Information and Communication Technology, 38050 Povo – Trento (Italy), Via Sommarive 14 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Oberle, D. (ed.): Semantic Management of Middleware. Springer Science+Business and Media, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sérasset, G.: Interlingual lexical organization for multilingual lexical databases in NADIA. In: Proc. COLING 1994, pp. 278–282 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lyding, V., Chiocchetti, E., Sérasset, G., Brunet-Manquat, F.: The LexALP information system: Term bank and corpus for multilingual legal terminology consolidated. In: Proc. of the Workshop on Multilingual Language Resources and Interoperability, ACL 2006, pp. 25–31 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sacco, R.: Contract. European Review of Private Law 2, 237–240 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Graziadei, M.: Tuttifrutti. In: Birks, P., Pretto, A. (eds.) Themes in Comparative Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Allen, J.: Towards a general theory of action and time. Artificial Intelligence 23(2), 123–154 (1984)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Krovetz, R.J.: Word sense disambiguation for large text databases. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Porter, M.: An Algorithm for Suffix Stripping. Program 3(14), 130–137 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fox, C.: A stop list for general text. SIGIR Forum 24(1-2), 19–21 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: ICML 1998: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 296–304. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Isaacs, J.D., Aslam, J.A.: Investigating measures for pairwise document similarity. Technical Report PCS-TR99-357, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Peters, W., Sagri, M., Tiscornia, D.: The Structuring of Legal Knowledge in LOIS. Artficial Intelligence and Law 2(15) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Francesconi, E., Tiscornia, D.: Building Semantic Resources for Legislative Drafting: the DALOS Project. In: Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Casellas, N., Rubino, R. (eds.) Computable Models of the Law. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4884, pp. 56–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cimiano, P.: Ontology Learning and Population from Text: Algorithms, Evaluation and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ajani, G. et al. (2010). Multilevel Legal Ontologies. In: Francesconi, E., Montemagni, S., Peters, W., Tiscornia, D. (eds) Semantic Processing of Legal Texts. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6036. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12837-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12837-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12836-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12837-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics