Skip to main content

Compact Monoidal Categories from Linguistics to Physics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Structures for Physics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 813))

Abstract

This is largely an expository paper, revisiting some ideas about compact 2-categories, in which each 1-cell has both a left and a right adjoint. In the special case with only one 0-cell (where the 1-cells are usually called “objects”) we obtain a compact strictly monoidal category. Assuming furthermore that the 2-cells describe a partial order, we obtain a compact partially ordered monoid, which has been called a pregroup. Indeed, a pregroup in which the left and right adjoints coincide is just a partially ordered group (= pogroup).

A brief exposition of recent joint work with Preller and Lambek “Mathematical Structures in Computer Science”, 17, (2007) will be given here, investigating free compact strictly monoidal categories, which may be said to describe computations in pregroups. Free pregroups lend themselves to the study of grammar in natural languages such as English. While one would not expect to find a connection between linguistics and physics, applications of (free) compact symmetric monoidal categories to physics have been made by Coecke “The Logic of Entanglement” (2004), Abramsky and Coecke “Proceedings of 19th IEEE Conference on Logic in Computer Science”, pp. 415–425 (2004), Abramsky and Duncan “Mathematical Structures in Computer Science”, 16, 469–489 (2006), Selinger “Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science”, 170, 139–163 (2007).

Compact symmetric monoidal categories had already been studied by Kelly and Laplaza “Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra”, 19, 193–213 (1980), who called them “compact closed” and by Barr “Lecture Notes in Mathematics”, 752 (1979), “Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra”, 111, 1–20 (1996), “Theoretical Computer Science”, 139, 115–130 (1995), who called them “compact star-autonomous”. I had intended to show that Feynman diagrams for quantum electro-dynamics (QED) could be described by certain compact Barr-autonomous categories, but was disappointed to find that these reduced to a rather degenerate case, that of partially ordered groups (= pogroups). Still, I will reluctantly present an extension of this idea from QED to the Standard Model. Finally, I will briefly review the transition from 2-categories to the bicategories of Bénabou “Lecture Notes in Mathematics” 47, 1–77 (1967), using methods of Bourbaki “Algebre multilineaire” (1948) and Gentzen (see Kleene “Introduction to metamathematics” (1952)), which may also be of interest in physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abramsky, S., Coecke, B.: A categorical semantics of quantum protocols, In: Proceedings of 19th IEEE conference on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 415–425. IEEE Press Washington, DC (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bénabou, J.: Introduction to bicategories. Lect. Notes Math. 47, 1–77 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bilson-Thompson, S.O.: A topological model of composite preons, Preprint 2006. arXiv:hep-ph/0503213

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bilson-Thompson, S.O., Markopoulou, F., Smolin, L.: Quantum Gravity and the Standard Model, Preprint 2006. arXiv:hep-th/0603022

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bourbaki, N.: Algèbre multilinéaire, Hermann, Paris (1948)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Buszkowski, W.: Cut elimination for the Lambek calculus of adjoints. In: Abrusci, V.M. et al. (eds.) Papers in formal linguistics and logic. Bulzoni, Rome (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Doşen, K.: Cut elimination in categories, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Doşen, K., Petrić, Z.: Proof-net categories, Project 1650. Math. Institute, Belgrade (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feynman, R.P.: QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Glass, A.: Partially ordered groups, World Scientific, Singapore (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harari, H.: Phys. Lett. 86B, 83–86 (1979)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris, Z.: A cyclic cancellation automaton for sentence well-formedness. Int. Comput. Centre Bull. 5, 69–94 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joyal, A., Street, R.: Braided monoidal categories, Macquarrie University Report No. 800081 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Joyal, A., Street, R.: The geometry of tensor calculus I. Adv. Math. 88, 55–112 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelly, G.M., Laplaza, M.L.: Coherence for compact closed categories. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 19, 193–213 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kleene, S.C.: Introduction to metamathematics, Van Nostrand (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lambek, J.: Lectures on Rings and Modules, pp. 1976. Waltham, Mass (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lambek, J.: Multicategories revisited. Contem. Math. 92, 217–239 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Lambek, J.: Logic without structural rules. (Another look at cut elimination). In: Doşen, K. et al, (eds.) Substructural Logic, Studies in Logic and Computation 2, pp. 129–206. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lambek, J.: Type grammar revisited. In: Lecomte, A. et al. (eds.) Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, Springer LNAI 1582, 1–27 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lambek, J.: Four-vector representation of fundamental particles. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 39 (2253)–2258 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Lambek, J.: Bicategories in algebra and linguistics. In: Ehrhard, T. et al. (eds.) Linear Logic in Computer Science. LondonMathematical Society Lecture Note Series 316, pp. 325–245. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mac Lane S.: Categories for the working mathematician, Springer, New York (1971)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Preller, A., Lambek, J.: Free compact 2-categories. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci. 17, 309–340 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Selinger, P.: Dagger compact closed categories and completely positive maps. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 170, 139–163 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Shupe, M.A.: Phys. Lett. 86B, 87–92 (1979)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Troelstra, A.S.: Lectures on linear logic, CSLI Lecture Notes 29, Stanford (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Lambek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-VerlagBerlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lambek, J. (2010). Compact Monoidal Categories from Linguistics to Physics. In: Coecke, B. (eds) New Structures for Physics. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 813. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12821-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12821-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12820-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12821-9

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics