Skip to main content

Avoiding Inconsistency in User Preferences for Data Quality Aware Queries

  • Conference paper
Business Information Systems (BIS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 47))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In situations where for a single query, multiple sources of information are available or needed, quality of data sources should be considered. We introduce a framework called data-quality aware query systems (DQAQS) that factors in the quality of data in the query answering process. Query is answered by taking quality of elements of data into account against the user’s data-quality preferences such as completeness, currency, etc. User preferences may convey inconsistency which compromises the query response. In this paper we propose a method to graphically capture user preferences and visually feedback user on consistency of the query, through an efficient algorithm for detecting inconsistency in real-time, thus improving user satisfaction in DQAQS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benjelloun, O., Garcia-Molina, H., Su, Q., Widom, J.: Swoosh: A generic approach to entity resolution. VLDB Journal (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bjorklund, A., Husfeldt, T., Khanna, S.: Approximating longest directed paths and cycles. In: Díaz, J., Karhumäki, J., Lepistö, A., Sannella, D. (eds.) ICALP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3142, pp. 222–233. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borzsonyi, S., Kossmann, D., Stocker, K.: The skyline operator. In: Proc. of ICDE, pp. 421–430 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chomicki, J.: Querying with Intrinsic Preferences. LNCS, vol. 2287, pp. 34–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cong, G., Fan, W., Geerts, F., Jia, X., Ma, S.: Improving data quality: consistency and accuracy. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on Very large data bases, pp. 315–326 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friedman, T., Bitterer, A.: Magic Quadrant for Data Quality Tools. Gartner Group (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Govindarajan, K., Jayaraman, B., Mantha, S.: Preference Queries in Deductive Databases. New Generation Computing 19(1), 57–86 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hey, J.D.: Do Rational People Make Mistakes? In: Game Theory, Experience, Rationality: Foundations of Social Sciences, Economics and Ethics: in Honor of John C. Harsanyi, p. 55 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hey, J.D., Orme, C.: Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1291–1326 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khodabandehloo, N.Y., Sadiq, S.: A study of Data Quality issues in mobile telecom operators (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kießling, W.: Foundations of preferences in database systems. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 311–322. VLDB Endowment (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kießling, W., Köstler, G.: Preference SQL: design, implementation, experiences. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Very Large Data Bases, vol. 28, pp. 990–1001 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kulok, M., Lewis, K., Asme, M.: A Method to Ensure Preference Consistency in Multi-Attribute Selection Decisions. Journal of Mechanical Design 129, 1002 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lacroix, M., Lavency, P.: Preferences: Putting More Knowledge into Queries. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 217–225. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lakshmanan, L.V.S., Leone, N., Ross, R., Subrahmanian, V.S.: ProbView: a flexible probabilistic database system. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS) 22(3), 419–469 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yeganeh, N.K., Sadiq, S., Deng, K., Zhou, X.: Data quality aware queries in collaborative information systems. In: Li, Q., Feng, L., Pei, J., Wang, S.X., Zhou, X., Zhu, Q.-M. (eds.) APWeb/WAIM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5446, pp. 39–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Saaty, T.L.: Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. RWS Publications (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scannapieco, M., Missier, P., Batini, C.: Data quality at a glance. Datenbank-Spektrum 14, 6–14 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yeganeh, N.K., Sadiq, S. (2010). Avoiding Inconsistency in User Preferences for Data Quality Aware Queries. In: Abramowicz, W., Tolksdorf, R. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 47. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12814-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12814-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12813-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12814-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics