Abstract
Building high-performing software development teams increases the likelihood that firms can meet the expectations of software development projects. Due to the cross-functional nature of the majority of software development projects, the required knowledge for project completion is distributed among stakeholders from different functional units. This implies the importance of efficient interaction and knowledge sharing among different parties involved in the project. To investigate the mechanisms behind effective knowledge sharing among members of this kind of software development projects, the current study combines the game theoretical model of knowledge sharing and the social interdependence theory as a foundation for developing a conceptual model for this study. The integration of these theories as a conceptual basis will help in identifying the constructs that represent effective knowledge sharing. A preliminary model for the constructs’ measures is developed through a number of steps. This study proposes a two-step research design process. The results of the first phase are briefly discussed and a number of major issues in the second phase are also explained.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Patnayakuni, R., Rai, A., Tiwana, A.: Systems development process improvement: A knowledge integration perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 54, 286–300 (2007)
He, J.: Knowledge impacts of user participation: a cognitive perspective. In: SIGMIS conference on Computer personnel research: Careers, culture, and ethics in a networked environment. ACM, New York (2004)
Pee, L.G., Kankanhalli, A., Kim, H.W.: Examining Knowledge Sharing in IS Development Projects: A Social Interdependence Perspective. In: 3rd International Research Workshop on Information Technology Project Management (IRWITPM), France, Paris, pp. 61–72 (2008)
Nelson, K.M., Cooprider, J.G.: The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance. MIS Quarterly, 409–432 (1996)
Curtis, B., Krasner, H., Iscoe, N.: A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACMÂ 31 (1988)
Deutsch, M.: Cooperation and competition. In: The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice, Jossey Bass (2000)
Loebecke, C., Van Fenema, P.C., Powell, P.: Co-Opetition and Knowledge Transfer. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 30 (1999)
He, J., Butler, B.S., King, W.R.: Team Cognition: Development and Evolution in Software Project Teams. Journal of Management Information Systems 24, 261–292 (2007)
Pinto, M.B., Pinto, J.K., Prescott, J.E.: Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Science, 1281–1297 (1993)
Luo, X., Slotegraaf, R.J., Pan, X.: Cross-Functional ’Coopetition’: The Simultaneous Role of Cooperation and Competition Within Firms. Journal of Marketing 70, 67–80 (2006)
Tsai, W.: Social Structure of “Coopetition” Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing. Organization Science 13, 179–190 (2002)
Song, X.M., Montoya-Weiss, M.M., Schmidt, J.B.: Antecedents and consequences of cross-functional cooperation: a comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives. An international publication of the product development & management association 14, 35–47 (1997)
Lado, A.A., Boyd, N.G., Hanlon, S.C.: Competition, Cooperation, and the Search for Economic Rents: A Syncretic Model. The Academy of Management Review 22, 110–141 (1997)
Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J.R., Humphery, S.E., Moon, H., Conlon, D.E., Ilgen, D.R.: Cooperation, Competition, And Team Performance: Toward A Contingency Approach. Academy of Management Journal 46, 572–590 (2003)
Deutsch, M.: A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations 2, 129–152 (1949)
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T.: New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs 131, 285–358 (2006)
Haas, M.R., Hansen, M.T.: Different knowledge, different benefits: toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management Journal 28, 1133–1153 (2007)
Mingers, J.: Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Information Systems Research 12, 240–259 (2001)
Tashakkori, Teddlie, A.C.: Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage Pubns., Thousand Oaks (2002)
Remenyi, Williams, D.B.: The nature of research: qualitative or quantitative, narrative or paradigmatic? Information Systems Journal 6, 131–146 (1996)
Chin, W.W.: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. Management Information Systems Quarterly 22, 7–16 (1998)
Chin, W.W.: How to write up and prepare PLS analysis. In: Hand Book of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (2009)
Churchill Jr., G.A.: A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 64–73 (1979)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ghobadi, S., Daneshgar, F., Low, G. (2010). A Model of Cross-Functional Coopetition in Software Development Project Teams. In: Abramowicz, W., Tolksdorf, R. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 47. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12814-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12814-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12813-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12814-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)