Abstract
Despite the advances in argumentation on group decision negotiation there is a need to simulate and identify the personality of participants. To make participants agents more human-like and to increase their flexibility in the negotiation process in group decision-making, the authors investigated the role of personality behaviours of participants applied to the conflict style theme. The negotiation is made in a bilateral way where both parties are OCEAN participant agents based on the five-factor model of personality (Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness and Negative emotionality).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Haslett, B.B., Ruebush, J.: What differences do individual differences in groups make? The effects of individuals, culture, and group composition. In: Frey, L.R. (ed.), Gournan, D.S., Pole, M.S. (Assoc. eds.) The handbook of group communication theory and research, pp. 115–138. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1999)
McRae, R.R., Costa, P.T.: Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, 81–90 (1987)
McRae, R.R., Costa, P.T., Del Pilar, G.H., Rolland, J.P., Parker, W.D.: Cross-cultural assessment of the five-factor model: The revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 29, 171–188 (1998)
Marreiros, G., Ramos, C., Neves, J.: Dealing with Emotional Factors in Agent Based Ubiquitous Group Decision. In: Enokido, T., Yan, L., Xiao, B., Kim, D.Y., Dai, Y.-S., Yang, L.T. (eds.) EUC-WS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3823, pp. 41–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Davidsson, P.: Multi agent based simulation: beyond social simulation. In: Moss, S., Davidsson, P. (eds.) Proc. of the Second international Workshop on Multi-Agent Based Simulation, pp. 97–107. Springer, New Jersey (2001)
Jennings, N., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A., Parson, S., Sierra, C., Wooldridge, M.: Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods, and challenges. Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation 2(10), 199–215 (2001)
Zachary, W., Ryder, J.: Decision Support Systems: Integrating Decision Aiding and Decision Training. In: Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, ch. VII, pp. 1235–1258. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1997)
Marreiros, G., Santos, R., Ramos, C., Neves, J., Novais, P., Machado, J., Bulas-Cruz, J.: Ambient intelligence in emotion based ubiquitous decision making. In: Articial Intelligence Techniques for Ambient Intelligence, IJCAI 2007, Hyderabad, India (2007)
John, O.P., Srivastava, S.: The Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives. In: Pervin, L.A., John, O.P. (eds.) Handbook of personality: Theory and research, vol. 2, pp. 102–138. Guilford Press, New York (1999)
Neves, J.: A Logic Interpreter to Handle Time and Negation in Logic Data Bases. In: Proceedings of ACM 1984, The Fifth Generation Challenge, pp. 50–54 (1984)
Andrade, F., Neves, J., Novais, P., Machado, J., Abelha, A.: Legal Security and Credibility in Agent Based Virtual Enterprises. In: Collaborative Networks and Their Breeding Environments, pp. 501–512. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Ortony, A.: On making believable emotional agents believable. In: Trapple, R. (ed.) Emotions in humans and artefacts. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)
OKeefe, D.: Persuasion: Theory and Research. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (1990)
Pruitt, D.: Negotiation Behavior. Academic Press, New York (1981)
Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchick, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence 104(1-2), 1–69 (1998)
Salancik, G., Pfeffer, J.: Who Gets Power and how they hold on to it- A Strategic Contingency Model of Power. Organizational Dynamics 5, 3–21 (1977)
Marreiros, G., Santos, R., Ramos, C., Neves, J., Bulas-Cruz, J.: ABS4GD: A Multi-agent System that Simulates Group Decision Processes Considering Emotional and Argumentative Aspects. In: AAAI Spring Symposium on Emotion, Personality and Social Behaviour, Stanford, pp. 88–95 (2008)
Ghasem-Aghaee, N., Oren, T.I.: Effects of cognitive complexity in agent simulation: Basics. In: SCS 2004, pp. 15–19 (2004)
Costa Jr., P.T., McCrae, P.R.: NEO PI-R Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa (1992)
Howard, P.J., Howard, J.M.: The BIG FIVE Quickstart: An introduction to the five-factor model of personality for human resource professionals. Center for Applied Cognitive Studies, Charlotte (2004)
Acton-Glossary, http://www.personalityresearch.org/glossary.html
AHD: The American Heritage Dictionary, http://www.bartleby.com/61/86/c0578600.html
Miller, C.E.: The social psychology effects of group decision rules. In: Paulus, P.B. (ed.) Psychology of group influence, 2nd edn., pp. 327–355. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1989)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Santos, R., Marreiros, G., Ramos, C., Neves, J., Bulas-Cruz, J. (2010). Using Personality Types to Support Argumentation. In: McBurney, P., Rahwan, I., Parsons, S., Maudet, N. (eds) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ArgMAS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6057. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12804-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12805-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)