Abstract
This study attempts to quantify landslide susceptibility in the upper Putna River basin in the Romanian Carpathians Bend using GIS techniques and logistic regression. First, a detailed landslide inventory was carried out and a GIS database was built, comprising potential predictors of landslide occurrence. The GIS database included 11 quantitative predictors, mostly geomorphometric parameters, and 4 qualitative predictors which were transformed into quantitative variables using landslide density approach. The logistic regression analysis, combined with a stepwise selection of the predictors, showed that landslide occurrence is best explained by slope inclination class, altitude, soil class, distance to drainage network and surface geology. The results show that the potentially unstable terrains, displaying high and very high landslide susceptibility values, cover an area about 3 times greater than the mapped landslide area.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58:21–44
Anbalagan R (1992) Landslide hazard evaluation and zonation mapping in mountainous terrain. Eng Geol 32:269–277
Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Ugawa N (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides 1:73–81
Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Marui H, Kanno T (2005) Landslides in Sado Island of Japan: Part II. GIS-based susceptibility mapping with comparisons of results from two methods and verifications. Eng Geol 81:432–445
Bai SB, Wang J, Lü GN, Zhou PG, Hou SS, Xu SN (2010) GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping of the Zhongxian segment in the three Gorges area, China. Geomorphol 115:23–31
Barredo JI, Benavides A, Hervas J, van Westen CJ (2000) Comparing heuristic landslide hazard assessment techniques using GIS in the Tirajana basin, Gran Canaria Island, Spain. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 2:9–23
Bălteanu D (1979) Procese de modelare a versanţilor declanşate de cutremurul din 4 martie 1977 în Carpaţii şi Supcarpaţii Buzăului. Stud Cercet Geol Geofiz Geogr Ser Geogr 26
Bălteanu D, Chendeş V, Sima M, Enciu P (2010) A country-wide spatial assessment of landslide susceptibility in Romania. Geomorphol 124:102–112
Binaghi E, Luzi L, Madella P (1998) Slope instability zonation: a comparison between certainty factor and fuzzy dempster-shafer approaches. Nat Hazards 17:77–97
Borgogno Mondino E, Giardino M, Perotti L (2009) A neural network method for analysis of hyperspectral imagery with application to the Cassas landslide (Susa Valley, NW-Italy). Geomorphol 110:20–27
Carrara A, Cardinali M, Detti R, Guzzetti F, Pasqui V, Reichenbach P (1991) GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard. Earth Surf Proc Landf 16:427–445
Castellanos Abella EA, Van Westen CJ (2008) Qualitative landslide susceptibility assessment by multicriteria analysis: A case study from San Antonio del Sur, Guantánamo, Cuba. Geomorphol 94:453–466
Corominas J, Moya J (2008) A review of assessing landslide frequency for hazard zoning purposes. Eng Geol 102:193–213
Dumitrescu I, Săndulescu M, Bandrabur T (1970) The geological map of Romania, Covasna sheet, scale 1:100,000. Com de Stat al Geologiei, Bucharest
Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Eng Geol 102:85–98
Grozavu A, Mărgărint MC, Patriche CV (2010) GIS applications for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study in Iaşi County (Moldavian Plateau, Romania). In: Brebbia CA (ed.) Risk Analysis VII & Brownfields V, WIT Press, Southampton, pp 393–404
Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, central Italy. Geomorphol 31:181–216
Ichim I, Rădoane M, Rădoane N, Miclăuş C, Grasu C (1996) Sediment budget of the Putna drainage basin (Vrancea). Rev Roum Geogr 40:125–132
Ichim I, Rădoane M, Rădoane N, Grasu C, Miclăuş C (1998) Dinamica sedimentelor. Aplicaţie la râul Putna-Vrancea, Editura Tehnica, Bucharest
Komac M (2006) A landslide susceptibility model using the analytical hierarchy process method and multivariate statistics in perialpine Slovenia. Geomorphol 74:17–28
Lee S, Ryu JH, Won JS, Park HJ (2004) Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network. Eng Geol 71:289–302
Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. Wiley, New York
Mantovani F, Soeters R, Van Westen CJ (1996) Remote sensing techniques for landslide studies and hazard zonation in Europe. Geomorphol 15:213–225
Micu M, Bălteanu D (2009) Landslide hazard assessment in the Bend Carpathians and Subcarpathians, Romania. Z Geomorphol 53(3):49–64
Nefeslioglu HA, Duman TY, Durmaz S (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping for a part of tectonic Kelkit Valley (eastern Black Sea region of Turkey). Geomorphol 94:410–418
Soeters R, Van Westen CJ (1996) Slope instability recognition, analysis, and zonation. In: Turner KA, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation. Transport Research Board Special Report 247, National Research Council, Washington, DC
Süzen ML, Doyuran V (2004a) Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment, Turkey. Eng Geol 71:303–321
Süzen ML, Doyuran V (2004b) A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Env Geol 45:665–679
Thiery Y, Malet JP, Sterlacchini S, Puissant A, Maquaire O (2007) Landslide susceptibility assessment by bivariate methods at large scales: application to a complex mountainous environment. Geomorphol 92:38–59
Tufescu V (1966) Subcarpaţii. Editura Ştiinţifică, Bucharest
Ursu A (2006) The use of Geographic Informational Systems in the study of natural hazards. Geogr Tech 2:113–120
Van Den Eeckhaut M, Marre A, Poesen J (2010) Comparison of two landslide susceptibility assessments in the Champagne–Ardenne region (France). Geomorphol 115:141–155
Van Westen CJ, Van Asch TWJ, Soeters R (2006) Landslide hazard and risk zonation: why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Environ 65:167–184
Yin KL, Yan TZ (1988) Statistical prediction model for slope instability of metamorphosed rocks. In: Bonnard C (ed) Proceedings, 5th International Symposium on Landslides. Balkema, Rotterdam
Acknowledgments
This study was carried out with financial support from the project POSDRU/89/1.5/S/49944 coordinated by „Al. I. Cuza” University of Iaşi, Romania. The authors wish to thank the reviewers whose comments and corrections were extremely useful for the improvement of the chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grozavu, A., Pleşcan, S., Patriche, C.V., Mărgărint, M.C., Roşca, B. (2013). Landslide Susceptibility Assessment: GIS Application to a Complex Mountainous Environment. In: Kozak, J., Ostapowicz, K., Bytnerowicz, A., Wyżga, B. (eds) The Carpathians: Integrating Nature and Society Towards Sustainability. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12725-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12725-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12724-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12725-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)